Ex Military and Depleted Uranium Rounds - The Domestic Terrorists of the East Bay
Ex Military and Depleted Uranium Rounds
By Pete Bennett The Scandal Editor
Walnut Creek CA -- For many years various stories would surface about the stolen munitions related to the The 1989 San Pablo Armory Thefts where today I've sensed a mysterious shroud has descended over this long forgotten incident.
My personal connection is my long shuttered cabinet shop fabricated a large registration counter for Contra Costa College. To date the only references I've found to the site is a graphic of where the armory once stood. Interestingly is the comments section are references to Adachi Nursery and Miyamoto Florist located in the area which I know leads to the Sugihara family whose matriarch Eiko Sugihara died in a tragic murder down the road from Daniel Horowitz's tragic murder of his wife Pamela Vitale.
My personal connection is my long shuttered cabinet shop fabricated a large registration counter for Contra Costa College. To date the only references I've found to the site is a graphic of where the armory once stood. Interestingly is the comments section are references to Adachi Nursery and Miyamoto Florist located in the area which I know leads to the Sugihara family whose matriarch Eiko Sugihara died in a tragic murder down the road from Daniel Horowitz's tragic murder of his wife Pamela Vitale.
OBIT: Catalina Torres - Another Christopher Butler Jet Fueled Divorce
Pete BennettJuly 02, 2014contra Costa Bar Association, Contra Costa Grand Jury, Murder, OBIT, Obituaries, The Torres Family Murders, The Torres Family Story
Friend of Benny Chetcuti Jr.
Reposted By: Pete Bennett The deaths of Contra Costa Times Employees Ian Lotta Scott, Michael Taugher and Margaret Lesher who death is like Catherine Perata all appear to death by association with Seeno.
Details emerge in Martinez triple shooting
POSTED: 09/07/2008 08:22:52 PM PDT
UPDATED: 01/01/2009 10:56:53 AM PST
Catalina Torres survived domestic abuse and became a strong advocate for
a nonprofit group that helps victims of domestic violence.
"She was a battered woman who became an advocate," said Maria Preciado,
Torres' close friend. "She took negative experiences and turned them
into positive things."
In a tragic turn of events, the 44-year-old STAND Against Domestic
Violence volunteer lost her life Saturday, an innocent bystander in a
deadly domestic disturbance involving her cousin's estranged husband.
The Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office identified Felix Sandoval Jr.,
49, of Martinez, as the gunman who fatally shot Torres and Martinez
police Sgt. Paul Starzyk in an apartment behind Elegant Hair Design
salon, located at Pacheco Boulevard and Morello Avenue. Police shot and
killed Sandoval in the same unit.
More details emerged Sunday in the triple shooting that stunned the
county hub and its small police-force.
Officers were called to the salon about 11:35 a.m. Saturday on reports
of a domestic disturbance. Sandoval broke the salon's front window with
his hand and entered holding a gun, police said. According to witnesses,
he was looking for his estranged wife, salon owner Margarita Sandoval.
Martinez police Chief Tom Simonetti said Felix Sandoval, who was waving
the gun around, never fired a shot in the salon, but confronted his
teenage daughter in the parking lot behind the salon and told her he was
going to kill his wife and his other children. Sandoval ran to an
upstairs apartment on the opposite side of the parking lot where Torres,
an unidentified woman and three of Sandoval's children were, the chief
said.
Moments later, Starzyk and a K-9 officer arrived at the scene. They
heard gunshots and climbed the stairs to the apartment.
"If we know there's violence of this nature going on, in the old days it
was lock it down and call for SWAT. But they made the correct decision
that there were people's lives in danger and they needed to get in
there," Simonetti said.
A gun battle erupted as the officers attempted to enter the apartment
and Starzyk was shot twice, Simonetti said. When a third officer reached
the apartment he saw Sandoval, who also had been shot, lying on the
floor with the gun still in his hand. When Sandoval moved, the officer
shot and killed him, the chief said.
Sandoval and Torres died at the scene. The children, who were hiding in
a closet, and the second woman were uninjured, police said.
Felix Sandoval owns the apartment building, but it was unclear who lived
in the apartment where the shootings happened, Simonetti said.
According to Contra Costa County Superior Court records, Margarita
Sandoval requested a restraining order against Felix Sandoval in July
2007. She filed for divorce a month later and the order was extended
until 2010. A settlement conference was scheduled for Oct. 27.
Margarita Sandoval could not be reached for comment.
Sheriff's office spokesman Jimmy Lee said autopsies will be performed
today to determine the causes of death.
Elegant Hair Salon, which sits next to a tattoo parlor on a nondescript
strip mall, has established a reputation in Martinez as the top hair
styling spot, especially for proms and other social events, clients
said.
On Sunday, the door was closed and wooden boards covered the broken
window. Patrons and Torres' friends laid flowers at the entrance of the
salon where Torres worked part time. One message read: "Our prayers are
with all of you during this sad time. May God be with you all."
Torres, nicknamed "Cata" by family and friends, was divorced with
children and had just become a grandmother, her friend Preciado said.
She fought through dyslexia and graduated from Diablo Valley College,
then returned to campus to teach math, her friend said. She participated
in Puente, a club encouraging minority students to continue their
education by transferring to four-year colleges.
"From third grade and on, I could never get math, but she could teach
you. The way she did it, she made it so easy," said Delin Finley,
Torres' former student. "She knew what it was like to not be able to
learn."
A mile away at the Martinez police station, well-wishers placed flowers
and lit candles in memory of Starzyk near the entrance.
Starzyk, a 12-year veteran of the force and a married father of three
small children, began his law enforcement career as a Martinez cadet.
Budget cuts forced him to join another department, but he returned to
Martinez and became a member of the Central Contra Costa Narcotics
Enforcement Team. Starzyk, 47, also supervised field training officers
who work with new recruits.
Starzyk is the second officer in Martinez police department history to
be killed in the line of duty. The first fatality was in 1973.
Starzyk's death has hit the close-knit department hard and grief
counselors are available, Simonetti said. Officers from Pleasant Hill,
Concord and the California Highway Patrol will patrol Martinez streets
for the next day or two.
Police are working closely with Starzyk's family to plan his funeral,
which is tentatively scheduled for Thursday. They are also setting up a
college fund for Starzyk's children, Simonetti said.
"The people of California are forever indebted to Paul's tireless
service, and we will never forget his selfless dedication to public
safety," Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said in a statement Sunday. Flags
flew at half-staff at the Capitol.
Reach Lisa P. White at 925-943-8011 or lwhite@bayareanewsgroup.com. Reach Katherine Tam at 510-262-2787 or ktam@bayareanewsgroup.com.
Catalina Torres survived domestic abuse and became a strong advocate for
a nonprofit group that helps victims of domestic violence.
"She was a battered woman who became an advocate," said Maria Preciado,
Torres' close friend. "She took negative experiences and turned them
into positive things."
In a tragic turn of events, the 44-year-old STAND Against Domestic
Violence volunteer lost her life Saturday, an innocent bystander in a
deadly domestic disturbance involving her cousin's estranged husband.
The Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office identified Felix Sandoval Jr.,
49, of Martinez, as the gunman who fatally shot Torres and Martinez
police Sgt. Paul Starzyk in an apartment behind Elegant Hair Design
salon, located at Pacheco Boulevard and Morello Avenue. Police shot and
killed Sandoval in the same unit.
More details emerged Sunday in the triple shooting that stunned the
county hub and its small police-force.
Officers were called to the salon about 11:35 a.m. Saturday on reports
of a domestic disturbance. Sandoval broke the salon's front window with
his hand and entered holding a gun, police said. According to witnesses,
he was looking for his estranged wife, salon owner Margarita Sandoval.
Martinez police Chief Tom Simonetti said Felix Sandoval, who was waving
the gun around, never fired a shot in the salon, but confronted his
teenage daughter in the parking lot behind the salon and told her he was
going to kill his wife and his other children. Sandoval ran to an
upstairs apartment on the opposite side of the parking lot where Torres,
an unidentified woman and three of Sandoval's children were, the chief
said.
Moments later, Starzyk and a K-9 officer arrived at the scene. They
heard gunshots and climbed the stairs to the apartment.
"If we know there's violence of this nature going on, in the old days it
was lock it down and call for SWAT. But they made the correct decision
that there were people's lives in danger and they needed to get in
there," Simonetti said.
A gun battle erupted as the officers attempted to enter the apartment
and Starzyk was shot twice, Simonetti said. When a third officer reached
the apartment he saw Sandoval, who also had been shot, lying on the
floor with the gun still in his hand. When Sandoval moved, the officer
shot and killed him, the chief said.
Sandoval and Torres died at the scene. The children, who were hiding in
a closet, and the second woman were uninjured, police said.
Felix Sandoval owns the apartment building, but it was unclear who lived
in the apartment where the shootings happened, Simonetti said.
According to Contra Costa County Superior Court records, Margarita
Sandoval requested a restraining order against Felix Sandoval in July
2007. She filed for divorce a month later and the order was extended
until 2010. A settlement conference was scheduled for Oct. 27.
Margarita Sandoval could not be reached for comment.
Sheriff's office spokesman Jimmy Lee said autopsies will be performed
today to determine the causes of death.
Elegant Hair Salon, which sits next to a tattoo parlor on a nondescript
strip mall, has established a reputation in Martinez as the top hair
styling spot, especially for proms and other social events, clients
said.
On Sunday, the door was closed and wooden boards covered the broken
window. Patrons and Torres' friends laid flowers at the entrance of the
salon where Torres worked part time. One message read: "Our prayers are
with all of you during this sad time. May God be with you all."
Torres, nicknamed "Cata" by family and friends, was divorced with
children and had just become a grandmother, her friend Preciado said.
She fought through dyslexia and graduated from Diablo Valley College,
then returned to campus to teach math, her friend said. She participated
in Puente, a club encouraging minority students to continue their
education by transferring to four-year colleges.
"From third grade and on, I could never get math, but she could teach
you. The way she did it, she made it so easy," said Delin Finley,
Torres' former student. "She knew what it was like to not be able to
learn."
A mile away at the Martinez police station, well-wishers placed flowers
and lit candles in memory of Starzyk near the entrance.
Starzyk, a 12-year veteran of the force and a married father of three
small children, began his law enforcement career as a Martinez cadet.
Budget cuts forced him to join another department, but he returned to
Martinez and became a member of the Central Contra Costa Narcotics
Enforcement Team. Starzyk, 47, also supervised field training officers
who work with new recruits.
Starzyk is the second officer in Martinez police department history to
be killed in the line of duty. The first fatality was in 1973.
Starzyk's death has hit the close-knit department hard and grief
counselors are available, Simonetti said. Officers from Pleasant Hill,
Concord and the California Highway Patrol will patrol Martinez streets
for the next day or two.
Police are working closely with Starzyk's family to plan his funeral,
which is tentatively scheduled for Thursday. They are also setting up a
college fund for Starzyk's children, Simonetti said.
"The people of California are forever indebted to Paul's tireless
service, and we will never forget his selfless dedication to public
safety," Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said in a statement Sunday. Flags
flew at half-staff at the Capitol.
Reach Lisa P. White at 925-943-8011 or lwhite@bayareanewsgroup.com. Reach Katherine Tam at 510-262-2787 or ktam@bayareanewsgroup.com.
OBIT: Eustacio Torres Jr. July 19th 2009
Pete BennettJuly 02, 2014CNET, Contra Costa Narcotics Enforcement Taskforce, Murder Suicides, OBIT, Obituaries, suicide, SW Florida, The Torres Family Murders
OBIT: Eustacio Torres Jr.
San Diego --Eustacio Torres Jr. Former Martinez Resident Eustacio Torres Jr., born in Orange County and raised in Martinez, California, passed on Sunday, July 19th 2009 at the age of 41. Eustacio was a loving and kind man dedicated to his family and community. Eustacio was a graduate of Alhambra High School and an alumnus of San Francisco State University where he majored in Science and Biology and a minor in Chemistry. Always a passionate athlete, Eustacio achieved the designation of "All American" in wrestling while attending SFSU. At the impressive age of 18 Eustacio became a license contractor in the State of California as a way to finance his education. When Eustacio saw a need, he would try to fill it. Whether it was coaching Alhambra High School's wrestling team, helping his parents, family, or friends, he always took great pride in sharing with others. In 1998, he relocated to Southern California to pursue graduate school studies. Thereafter, a career change led him to continue honing his craft as a General Contractor. Surely and steadily he became the sole proprietor of Sharp Construction, a development and remodeling firm located in San Diego, California. With numerous successful projects completed under his tenure, Eustacio will leave long standing examples of his dedication and commitment to the building industry. He also built pride and love in his family and friends through his compassionate heart and we will be a long standing example of his everlasting love. Eustacio lovingly known as "Stash" or "Tacho" is survived by his Mother Rafaela Ruvalcaba Torres; Father Eustacio Torres Sr.; siblings Guillermo, Silvia, Patricia, Noe; brothers-in-law Alberto and Alfonso; his nieces and nephews he loved as his own, Rafael, Nicolas, Victoria, Luis, Moises, Isabella, AJ and great-nephew Andrew. He was preceded in death by his beloved sister Catalina Torres. All who knew and loved Eustacio are invited to Saint Catherine's Catholic Church located at 1125 Ferry Street in Martinez, to a visitation vigil on Friday July 24th at 4pm. A funeral service will follow on Saturday July 25th at 11am. In lieu of flowers, a memorial fund will be accepting donations at Wells Fargo Bank account #2629533015. - See more at: OBIT: Eustacio Torres Jr. July 19th 2009
San Diego --Eustacio Torres Jr. Former Martinez Resident Eustacio Torres Jr., born in Orange County and raised in Martinez, California, passed on Sunday, July 19th 2009 at the age of 41. Eustacio was a loving and kind man dedicated to his family and community. Eustacio was a graduate of Alhambra High School and an alumnus of San Francisco State University where he majored in Science and Biology and a minor in Chemistry. Always a passionate athlete, Eustacio achieved the designation of "All American" in wrestling while attending SFSU. At the impressive age of 18 Eustacio became a license contractor in the State of California as a way to finance his education. When Eustacio saw a need, he would try to fill it. Whether it was coaching Alhambra High School's wrestling team, helping his parents, family, or friends, he always took great pride in sharing with others. In 1998, he relocated to Southern California to pursue graduate school studies. Thereafter, a career change led him to continue honing his craft as a General Contractor. Surely and steadily he became the sole proprietor of Sharp Construction, a development and remodeling firm located in San Diego, California. With numerous successful projects completed under his tenure, Eustacio will leave long standing examples of his dedication and commitment to the building industry. He also built pride and love in his family and friends through his compassionate heart and we will be a long standing example of his everlasting love. Eustacio lovingly known as "Stash" or "Tacho" is survived by his Mother Rafaela Ruvalcaba Torres; Father Eustacio Torres Sr.; siblings Guillermo, Silvia, Patricia, Noe; brothers-in-law Alberto and Alfonso; his nieces and nephews he loved as his own, Rafael, Nicolas, Victoria, Luis, Moises, Isabella, AJ and great-nephew Andrew. He was preceded in death by his beloved sister Catalina Torres. All who knew and loved Eustacio are invited to Saint Catherine's Catholic Church located at 1125 Ferry Street in Martinez, to a visitation vigil on Friday July 24th at 4pm. A funeral service will follow on Saturday July 25th at 11am. In lieu of flowers, a memorial fund will be accepting donations at Wells Fargo Bank account #2629533015. - See more at: OBIT: Eustacio Torres Jr. July 19th 2009
CHAPTER 10. PRIVATE PARKING LOTS
Benny Chetcuti Jr. Walnut Creek Real Estate Investor Indicted For Fraud
By Pete Bennett CNET Scandal
Date: March 3rd, 20146-10.01 Definitions.
a. "Business hours" mean the period from one hour before a business is open for customers until the business’ closing time for customers. For parking spaces designated for users of automated teller machines, or for employee, tenant or other non-customer reserved parking, "business hours" shall mean 24 hours a day.
b. "Mail-in parking fee" or "mail-in parking charge" means a charge for parking in an offstreet parking lot affixed to a vehicle whose driver is not authorized by signs to park in the offstreet parking lot for no fee.
c. "Notice of a parking charge" means a written document affixed to a vehicle which notifies the vehicle driver of a mail-in parking fee that is due as a result of unauthorized parking in an offstreet parking lot.
d. "Offstreet parking lot" means privately owned property that is generally held open to the public, or a discernible portion thereof, for the parking of vehicles at no fee.
e. "Person" shall mean any natural person, firm, company, corporation, partnership, or association.
f. "Private parking operator" means any person who owns or controls, or person who acts on behalf of or at the behest of a person who owns or controls, an offstreet parking lot. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02 and by 1§, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)
6-10.02 Compliance with This Chapter.
It shall be unlawful, and an unfair business practice within the meaning of Business and Professions Code Section 17200 for any person in an offstreet parking lot to charge a mail-in parking fee, or to issue or cause to be issued a notice of parking charge that is not in compliance with this chapter. Any notice of parking charge that is not in compliance with this chapter shall be invalid. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02 and by §1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03).
6-10.03 Mail-in Fees, Issuance of Notices of Parking Charges.
a. During normal business hours a private parking operator may charge a mail-in parking fee to owners of vehicles parked in the lot without authorization.
b. Where an offstreet parking lot of a closed business is in actual use for valet parking by an off-site business which is open for business and while valet parking is occurring additional signs are posted prohibiting all public parking a private parking operator may charge a mail-in parking fee to owners of vehicles parked in the lot without authorization.
c. Where an offstreet parking lot of a closed business utilizes a lock-box or other device requiring payment before parking, a private parking operator may charge a mail-in parking fee to owners of vehicles parked in the lot without authorization.
d. Except as provided in subsection (b) and (c), no mail-in parking fee shall be charged by a private parking operator outside of normal business hours for parking spaces designated for customer parking only during business hours. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02 and by §1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)
6-10.04 Amount of Fee.
No mail-in parking fee charged pursuant to this chapter shall exceed the initial amount of bail for violation of Municipal Code Section 4-6.301 (signed private parking) which currently is $20. No late charge or other fee shall be imposed unless expressly authorized by a resolution of the City Council. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00 §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02 and by §1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)
6-10.05 Additional Requirements-Signs
In addition to meeting the requirements of section 6-10.03 signs shall be posted as required by this section.
a. No mail-in parking fee shall be charged and no notice of parking charge shall be issued unless there are in place signs substantially in the form required by this chapter.
b. Signs shall contain a statement that the parking is restricted. For example:
"Parking for XXX Customers Only"
"Free Parking for XXX Customers Only"
"This Space Reserved for XXX"
"Parking for Tenants Only"
"Pay at Lock-box when Store Closed"
"Parking Lot Closed-Valet Parking Only"
c. Signs shall contain a statement with the fee for unauthorized parking. For example:
"All Unauthorized Parking $20"
" Immediate $20 Fee for Unauthorized Parking"
d. Signs shall contain a statement with the hours the parking restrictions are in force during which a mail-in parking fee may be charged. For example:
"$20 Fee Enforced During All Business Hours"
"Reserved Parking Restrictions Enforced 24 Hours A Day"
"Pay at Lock-box when Store Closed"
e. Signs must be posted at each entrance and exit to the lot, and must be visible from each restricted parking space. Where different restrictions apply to parking spaces with common entrances and exits, the restrictions applicable to each space shall be clearly delineated. The sign at each entrance shall include text or a symbol, to the approval of the Community Development Director, indicating that the offstreet parking lot has been certified by the City to allow private enforcement of parking controls within the lot.
f. The Community Development Director is hereby authorized to establish uniform sign sizes, colors, sizes of lettering, and other information that may be required on all signs in order to be in compliance with this section. If the Director establishes such criteria, all signs required by this chapter shall be brought into compliance within 60 days. The Director may authorize signs that vary from subsections (b) through (d), and such signs shall be deemed to be in compliance with this section.
g. Signs which indicate that a customer may park for no fee shall indicate whether the authorized parking is only for the time the customer is on the premises or whether it is for a limited duration of time. In the absence of such designation, a customer shall not be charged a mail-in parking fee.
h. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to modify the requirements Municipal Code Section 4-6.301 imposes on persons who seek to have the vehicles towed or have the City of Walnut Creek issue citations. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00; §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02 and by §1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)
6-10.06 Notice of Parking Charges.
a. No person shall place on any vehicle a notice of a parking charge which does not contain at the top of the notice in at least 12 point print the words "INVOICE" followed by "PARKING FEE IMPOSED BY XXX," inserting the name and street address of the business whose customers are designated to use the customer only parking during normal business hours.
b. No person shall place on any vehicle a notice of a parking charge which does not contain in at least 10 point print the listed Walnut Creek telephone number of the business whose customers are designated to use the customer only parking.
c. Where the reserved parking space is for someone other than a customer, the information required by subsection (a) and (b) shall be replaced with the corresponding information of the person who owns or controls the reserved parking space.
d. Every notice of parking charge shall end with the legend "This parking charge notice is not issued by the City of Walnut Creek." This provision shall be in a least 12 point print.
e. No notice of parking charge shall display any feature that resembles a City of Walnut Creek parking citation. The notice of parking charge shall be a color distinctive from a City parking citation. The Chief of Police shall approve the color or colors of the notice of parking charge.
f. Every notice of parking charge shall state that the business identified in subsection (a) may cancel the mail-in parking charge at any time for any reason. The categorical refusal of the business identified in subsection (a) to review a notice of parking charge upon request shall void the mail in parking fee.
g. Every notice of parking charge shall provide fair notice of the dispute resolution procedure described in §6-10.08. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02) and by (§1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)
6-10.07 Registration of Private Parking Operators and Certification of Offstreet Parking Lots.
a. Every private parking operator who issues notices of parking charges shall register with the Community Development Director before doing business in City of Walnut Creek. In addition to the information required by this section, the Community Development Director may require such other information as may enable the Director to determine compliance with this chapter. The fee for registering and amending the registration shall be set by City Council resolution.
b. The registration shall include the name, address and telephone number of the private parking operator, the names, home and business addresses and telephone numbers of each person owning 10% or more of the business, and the Walnut Creek business license number of the business.
c. The registration shall also include a list of all offstreet parking lots where mail-in parking fees are charged, which shall be updated prior to any new lot being added or within one month of any lot being dropped, along with the name, address and telephone number of each contact person or person authorized to resolve disputes for each offstreet parking lot.
d. Every private parking operator shall maintain for at least one year a list by offstreet parking lot of the notices of parking charges issued for each offstreet parking lot. This list shall be broken down by date, and for each date shall show the time, the parking violation and the license number of the vehicle issued the notice of parking charge. Upon request, these records or copies of these records shall be furnished to the Community Development Director.
e. On and after July 1, 2003 no notice of parking charge shall be issued in an offstreet parking lot unless the signing for the offstreet parking lot has been certified as being in compliance with this chapter. The Community Development Director shall do the certification. The frequency of the certification and the charge for certification of parking lots shall be fixed by resolution of the City Council. The certification may be withdrawn or suspended by the Director following notice and opportunity for a hearing if (i) the signing for the offstreet parking lot is found to be out of compliance with this chapter, (ii) if private parking charges are found to have been issued in violation of this chapter for parking in the lot, or (iii) if the private parking lot operator engaged in any other acts or omissions constituting a violation of this chapter with relation to the offstreet parking lot.
f. Any private parking lot owner aggrieved by a decision of the Director under subsection (e) may, within five business days of receipt of the decision, appeal the decision in writing to the City Manager who shall, following a hearing affirm, reverse or modify the decision of the Director. The decision of the City Manager shall be final. Upon the final administrative determination to suspend or withdraw the certification of an offstreet parking lot, the text or symbol indicating certification of the lot shall be immediately removed. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02) and by (§1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)
6-10.08 Dispute Resolution.
a. Every private property operator issuing notices of parking charges shall establish a written dispute resolution policy for contested parking charges that shall comply with this section. A copy of the current policy shall be filed with the Community Development Director. Every such policy shall contain the provision that allows the retailer, business or property owners who has issued the notice of parking charge, or authorized notices to be issued, to cancel the notice and parking charge at any time for any reason.
b. For a period of 21 calendar days from the issuance of a notice of parking charge or 14 calendar days from the mailing of a notice of delinquent parking charge, a person may request an initial review of the notice by the private parking operator. The request may be made by telephone, in writing, or in person. There shall be no charge for this review. If, following the initial review, the private parking operator is satisfied that the unauthorized parking did not occur, that the registered owner was not responsible for the charge, or that extenuating circumstances make dismissal of the charge appropriate in the interest of justice, the private parking operator shall cancel the notice of parking charge or notice of delinquent parking charge. The private parking operator shall mail the results of the initial review to the person contesting the notice.
c. If the person is dissatisfied with the results of the initial review, the person may request an administrative hearing of the charge no later than 21 calendar days following the mailing of the results of the private parking operator’s initial review. The request may be made by telephone, in writing, or in person. The person requesting an administrative hearing shall deposit the amount of the parking charge with the private parking operator. The private parking operator shall provide a written procedure to allow a person to request an administrative hearing without payment of the parking charge upon satisfactory proof of an inability to pay the amount due. Notice of this procedure shall be provided to all persons requesting an administrative hearing. An administrative hearing shall be held within 90 calendar days following the receipt of a request for an administrative hearing, excluding time tolled pursuant to this section. The person requesting the hearing may request one continuance, not to exceed 21 calendar days.
d. The administrative hearing process shall include the following:
(1) The person requesting a hearing shall have the choice of a hearing by mail or in person. An in-person hearing shall be conducted within the City of Walnut Creek.
(2) If the person requesting a hearing is a minor, that person shall be permitted to appear at a hearing or admit responsibility for the parking charge without the necessity of the appointment of a guardian. The private parking operator may proceed against the minor in the same manner as against an adult.
(3) The administrative hearing shall be conducted in accordance with written procedures established by the private parking operator and approved by the Community Development Director. The hearing shall provide an independent, objective, fair, and impartial review of contested parking charges.
(4) (A) The private parking operator shall contract with an independent third party that is not controlled by a private parking operator who shall provide qualified examiners to conduct the administrative hearings. Examiners shall demonstrate those qualifications, training, and objectivity necessary to conduct a fair and impartial review. An examiner shall not be employed, managed, or controlled by a person whose primary duties are as a private parking operator, parking charge processing, collection, or issuance. The examiner shall be separate and independent from the parking charge collection or processing function. An examiner’s continued employment, performance evaluation, compensation, and benefits shall not, directly or indirectly, be linked to the amount of parking charges collected by the examiner.
(B) Examiners shall have a minimum of 20 hours of training. The examiner is responsible for the costs of the training. The private parking operator may reimburse the examiner for those costs. Training may be provided through (i) an accredited college or university, (ii) a program conducted by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, (iii) American Arbitration Association or a similar established organization, or (iv) through any program approved by the Chief of Police, including a program developed and provided by, or for, the City. Training programs may include topics relevant to the administrative hearing, including, but not limited to, applicable laws and regulations, private parking operator procedures, due process, evaluation of evidence, hearing procedures, and effective oral and written communication. Upon the approval of the Chief of Police, up to 12 hours of relevant experience may be substituted for up to 12 hours of training. In addition, up to eight hours of the training requirements described in this subparagraph may be credited to an individual, at the discretion of the Chief of Police, based upon training programs or courses described in (i) to (iv), inclusive, that the individual attended within the last five years.
(5) The person who issues a notice of parking charge shall not be required to participate in an administrative hearing. The private parking operator shall not be required to produce any evidence other than the notice of parking charge or copy thereof and information received from the Department of Motor Vehicles identifying the registered owner of the vehicle. The documentation in proper form shall be prima facie evidence of the charge.
(6) The examiner’s decision following the administrative hearing may be personally delivered to the person by the examiner or sent by first-class mail.
(7) Following a determination by the examiner that a person owes the charge, the examiner may allow payment of the parking charge in installments, or a private parking operator may allow for deferred payment or allow for payments in installments, if the person provides evidence satisfactory to the examiner or the private parking operator, as the case may be, of an inability to pay the parking penalty in full. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02) and by (§, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03
6-10.09 Unauthorized Business Practices.
a. No private parking operator shall utilize the Denver boot or other similar device that is attached to the vehicle and which immobilizes the vehicle.
b. No person shall report or threaten to report an unpaid notice of a parking charge to a credit bureau or a collection agency unless a small claims court or other judicial proceeding has established the debt. No person shall take any action or threaten to take any action to collect, or contact with another person who takes or threatens to take any action to collect an unpaid notice of a parking charge other than to seek establishment of the debt in a small claims court or other judicial proceeding.
c. No private parking operator shall pay any employee or independent contractor a salary or fee that is in any way based on the number of notices of private parking charges they issue.
d. Every private parking operator who collects a mail in parking charge in violation of this chapter shall refund the fee to the owner of the vehicle (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02) and by (§1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)
6-10.10 Application to Core Area.
a. This chapter shall only apply within the Core Area of Walnut Creek as that portion of Walnut Creek is designated in the Planning Boundaries map shown in Chapter 1, Figure 2, of the Walnut Creek General Plan.
b. The City Council may by resolution designate other areas of the City of Walnut Creek where the provisions of this chapter shall be applicable. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02 and by §1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)
6-10.11 Penalty.
Any person who violates any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor or an infraction.
a. If charged as an infraction, the penalty upon conviction of such person shall be a fine as set forth in §1-2.01 of this code.
b. If charged as a misdemeanor, the penalty upon conviction of such person shall be imprisonment in the county jail for a period not to exceed six months, or a fine not exceeding $1,000 of by both such fine and imprisonment. (§1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)
The Walnut Creek Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2128, passed April 1, 2014.
Disclaimer: The City Clerk's Office has the official version of the Walnut Creek Municipal Code. Users should contact the City Clerk's Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above.
Pressing EBMUD for answers
petercbennett123July 02, 2014attorney, BANTA, EBMUD, FBI, Gas Pipeline Explosions, Las Lomas High School
Pressing EBMUD for answers
The final straw was another Hit and Run in Lafayette CA where July 20th 2011 my car was totaled. That event galvanized this blogger as Chief Christensen has refused to investigate.
The Explosion
My position in regards to my 2004 Truck Arson Fire is as follows- Law Enforcement Personnel Involved
- Planned for insurance fraud Prudential Universal Life Policy $855,000
- Mountain Cascade - Pipeline Contractor
- Cal Fire Pipeline Safety Group - Lakewood CA
- EBMUD - Protecting the public's money
- The Litigation Players - Unsavory Plaintiff
- The State Bar - The first letters going
- Other Parties
The Deceased Witnesses
In early 2014, a former (but brief) friend named Alicia Driscoll and the alleged murder suicide of her daughter fell perfectly into my incident timeline. There are several other cases near the CNET Scandal (Police), Family Law, Contra Costa Bar Association whose members litigated many major catastrophic accidents reaping those Super Lawyer Settlements but along the way even their Super Lawyer Powers missed deposing what most Plaintiff Attorneys conclude was the most important unrelated witness who'd collaborate the horrible fire deaths linked to other horrible deaths by fire.Deceased Witnesses
ELLEN SABADUQUIA (1950-2005) Witness to the 2004 Walnut Creek Pipeline Explosion More
Explosive Profits by Disaster
Whistleblower Protection Act (the "Act"). First, under California Government Code section 8548.2
State agencies have two main ongoing responsibilities
How about protecting me?
State agencies have two main ongoing responsibilities with regard to the Whistleblower Protection Act (the "Act"). First, under California Government Code section 8548.2, each state agency must print notices distributed by the California State Auditor containing information concerning the Act and post the notices in locations where other employee notices are maintained. Second, under Government Code section 8548.3 each state agency annually must send the information contained in the notice by electronic mail to all of its employees. Every year, the State Auditor issues an updated notification in the form of a poster, memorandum for distribution to agency employees, and notification to departments to facilitate compliance with these responsibilities. The poster (also available in letter size),memorandum to employees, and annual notification to the departments may be downloaded here.
In addition, under section 20080 of the State Administrative Manual, state entities must notify the State Auditor's Office and the Department of Finance of all cases of actual or suspected fraud, defalcation, theft, or other irregularities. The notification should be in writing and provided not later than the first business day following the discovery of any such incident.
Jomorson Properties, Inc. has a role in:
Walnut Creek Real Estate Fraud Network
By Pete Bennett CNET
When you search litigation on Benny Chetcuti Jr. you'll find numerous cases leading a wide net of suspect fraud cases. The most important issues is how Chetcuti's litigation failed detection.
The guy driving the Suspect Vehicle 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser on July 1st 2012 was waiting on Sharlee Lane when the Dark Mercedes with #xxxxxx93 attempted to run me over, and that the FJ Cruiser known to park in front Walnut Creek City Hall and the Jomorson Properties that shares common corporate addresses with Regional Parking who towed my Ford Explorer away in December 2012.
Companies Found at this Address
Location of Regional Parking Walnut Creek - the city approves their Certified Lots which are certified to screw you over as you might want to read the
1204-Alpine-Rd-Walnut-Creek-CA-94596Jomorson Properties, Inc. has a role in:
MANAGING MEMBER
MEMBER
MEMBER
MEMBER
MEMBER
MEMBER
MEMBER
Active
Police Officers Filing False Reports California Penal Code 118.1
Pete BennettJuly 02, 2014ATF, California Penal Code 118.1, Contra Costa School Districts, County of Contra Costa, Danville Police, Danville Stake, Dead Students, Dead Witnesses, False Police Reports, FBI, Town of Danville, USDOJ
By Pete Bennett
By not filing or failing to investigate is essentially filing a false police report by omission which what has occurred with the following Agencies.
This pervasive pattern I have seen for decades from Pleasant Hill, Pittsburg, Concord, Walnut Creek and Danville. This is a county where they are willing to frame students like Scott Dyleski deaths of many in the county.
What's missing is just as important as what's there.
The Murders of San Ramon Valley Unified School District Students
Danville CA gas station at Sycamore and San Ramon Valley Road around 2000 they deliberately left out numerous first person witnesses who then were San Ramon Unified School District students. They did take their pictures, addresses and that's it failed in gathering important witness statements in regards to five police officers who unload their weapons which killed the suspect. Years later I asked e San Ramon Police officer about this incident and he referred to it as a "Good Kill" to which I replied "Officer, there is no such thing as a good kill" but blurted you should resign. You should resign.
By not filing or failing to investigate is essentially filing a false police report by omission which what has occurred with the following Agencies.
- Danville,
- CCSO,
- Lafayette Police,
- Pleasant Hill
- Walnut Creek Police PRE CHIEF TOM CHAPLIN
- From 1970s ending with Chief Bryden
- Under Chief Chaplin the officers now under surveillance and investigation.
This pervasive pattern I have seen for decades from Pleasant Hill, Pittsburg, Concord, Walnut Creek and Danville. This is a county where they are willing to frame students like Scott Dyleski deaths of many in the county.
What's missing is just as important as what's there.
The Murders of San Ramon Valley Unified School District Students
Danville CA gas station at Sycamore and San Ramon Valley Road around 2000 they deliberately left out numerous first person witnesses who then were San Ramon Unified School District students. They did take their pictures, addresses and that's it failed in gathering important witness statements in regards to five police officers who unload their weapons which killed the suspect. Years later I asked e San Ramon Police officer about this incident and he referred to it as a "Good Kill" to which I replied "Officer, there is no such thing as a good kill" but blurted you should resign. You should resign.
Suspect Vehicle 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser 2WD
By Pete Bennett
Walnut Creek CA--This is not an exact model years but color was close to Beige.
The suspect vehicle has been parked in the Walnut Creek City Offices parking lot and down the street where at 1330 N. Broadway Walnut Creek which leads to the table below.
Check on this page for links to how Benny Chetcuti Jr. is connected via litigation to Jo
Connections to
The suspect vehicle has been parked in the Walnut Creek City Offices parking lot and down the street where at 1330 N. Broadway Walnut Creek which leads to the table below.
Check on this page for links to how Benny Chetcuti Jr. is connected via litigation to Jo
Connections to
Name | Location | Details | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Benny Chetcuti | Walnut Creek, CA | Owner at Chetcuti & Assoc | ||
Benny Chetcuti | Walnut Creek, CA | President at Chetcuti and Associates, Inc.President at Jomorson Properties, Inc. | ||
Benny Chetcuti | Walnut Creek, CA | President at Bates Chetcuti Monchek, Inc.Director at O'Hara Foundation | ||
Benny Chetcuti | Walnut Creek, CA | President at Mosta Management Services, Inc. |