The Anatomy of Public Corruption

June 2014 SEC Whistleblower Complaint on Kinder Morgan and PG&E

The SEC Whistleblower Complaint 

Filing this complaint just after filing numerous public law claims with the City of Walnut Creek.  The timeline precedes the July 26, 2014 Letter to PG&E, San Bruno, City of Walnut Creek plus attempts by Bennett to run for Town Council. 

Tell us about your complaint

Please select the option that best describes your complaint
Material misstatement or omission in a company's public filings or financial statements, or a failure to file

Provide additional details about your complaint:
I am the person who called about the SEC Employee and her Domestic Partner who have been targeted by persons unknown in a similar manner that I've been targeted. Targeting: The concept by name is obvious where parties are dissuaded from coming forward, testifying, providing statements and/or their statements are deliberately omitted from the public record. In March 2011 I was retained to develop software for a PG&E Sub Contractor to developing software for a slew of emergency projects stemming from the Sept 2010 Gas Pipeline Explosion. ► Gas Pipeline Hydrotesting Project, ► PG&E Construction Group, ► Gas Transmission Group (GTG) ► Reconciliation of Construction Expense covering billions in receipts ► Personal Profile Feb 2011 ◄ Homeless, no computers, systems, laptop, on Food Stamps, no car, criminal warrants, in insurance or license (Unfairly fined 16,000), back child support, fraud victim, attorney had been beaten in Walnut Creek CA to prevent case from going forward, ongoing litigation, defaults, evictions and far too many reasons not to hire me. ► Returning from Modesto Operations - car from rear attempting high speed maneuver known as Swoop and Squat - Bennett was watching and slammed on brakes from 80 to 30 - they missed. That was swoop number four since 2004 PG&E Engagement • Hired around March 2011 but first contact was January 2011. • Not attempting to get hired as my personal situation was pathetic but client kept calling, offering decent rate of $65 per hour, provided car, work and gave near carte blanche access to internal PG&E documents. • Vendor sold Bennett car on time in almost no questions asked scenario, did not know me, was not concern of my personal and crushing liabilities, didn't even validate normal employment requirements, used sub-contractor status to circumvent PG&E security hiring protocols. ► Homeless between Walnut Creek CA and San Francisco ► Criminal Charges and Warrant - Butte County Superior Court http://contracostawatch.blogspot.com/2013/06/butte-county-superior-court-all-charge.html Criminal Charges Dismissed • Using highly unusual motion on Modification of Support http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2014/04/on-file-with-butte-county-court-line-12.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Preceding Significant Event - Gas Transmission High Performance Engineer ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ► Sept 2010 Event - The Gas Transmission High Performance Engineer and unstable San Francisco Lt. forced from the force in June 2010. These two individuals tie back to a local scandal known as the CNET (see link) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Timeline of CNET Contra Costa Narcotics Enforcement Taskforce (CCCnet but CNET) now disbanded http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2013/12/cnet-timeline-of-scandal.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Reaching Out To Public Officials Letter to Senator Feinstein Dear Senator Feinstein : I Am Forced to Beg for Help and Witness Protection From US Government http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2014/04/dear-senator-feinstein-i-am-forced-to.html Letter to California State Attorney General ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Contra Costa Bar Association Dead Attorney Syndrome - the name fits because they are killing persons near not just one case but many cases http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2014/06/contra-costa-bar-association-dead.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Are you having or have you had difficulty in getting access to your funds or securities?
Unknown

Did you suffer a loss?
No

Is the alleged conduct ongoing?
Yes

Has the individual or firm acknowledged the alleged conduct?
No

What is the source of your information? You may select more than one
Conversations; Publicly available information; SEC filings; Social media (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, blogs, chat rooms, and electronic communities of interest);

Have you taken any action regarding your complaint? You may select more than one
Complained to firm; Complained to other regulator; Complained to SEC; Complained to law enforcement; Complained to other; Legal action; Other;

Who did you contact and what action did you take?
For nearly ten years I've attempted to resolve an arson fire, several assault cases and other incidents criminal incidents. I have a long business history. When the CNET Arrests occurred my first insight to how my world had been continually disrupted and why I landed on the streets. In response to Action Taken when my I'm able to get a replacement laptop I can provided hundreds of letters in my attempts to solve accidents, arson, fires, murder/suicides and murders. I know judges, attorneys, police officers, victims, widows, CEO's, bankers, SVP to CEO. A few months back I identified persons near me were connected to my 2004 Arson fire, that preceded the deadly Kinder Morgan Fire but ten years later I I discovered a dead witnesses and all these findings were triggered by police officers who arrived via many reasons with either guns, false accusations or in some cases threats. Even with obvious repeated Civil Rights violations they kept coming. When attempting to get Kinder Morgan Documents I was practically met five police officers charging out from the WCPD offices that share a hallway with planning. My attempts to get police reports thwarted at every step - these police reports would provide access to Victims Compensation. My Attempts to resolve questions on the Kinder Morgan fire rebuked by CAL Fire Pipeline Safety Group, their attorneys and then moving back over the PG&E project they in turn refuse to resolve a simple $10,000 payment and have knowingly concealed events connected to the Software Engagement to me nearly being killed. Last week they nearly killed my music partner Don Watts whose car tires blew out in on I-5 OR Mile Post 129 - after reviewing crash concluded he had at least two bullet holes and one fist sized hole. His partner is SEC Investigator Christine Pulman residing on San Suici Court Walnut Creek CA. On the day of his accident he'd left Walnut Creek nearly in unison with another confrontation with Walnut Creek officers who I'm suspecting will match up with the the 2004 Bomb Squad Team. Leaving WC to arrive in Roseburg is close to six or seven hours - the WC City event was around 10AM his accident was 4:30 and they know we've been researching the accident and have likely eavesdropped our phones. Between these two domestic partners they've had seven or more accidents. I have been watching carefully since his car was hit last summer. That's almost one per month. Via Don I learned Christine's car crashed on Treasure Island but he's keenly aware that my accidents have allegations of laser induced blindness. The Lafayette Police Department has refused to investigate. The California Highway Patrol took up one of these accident in Sept 2011. Since then more than 10 persons connected to this story have been killed - some are perfect accidents others were plain old murders. Everything near me is attacked based with clear stonewalling. ------------------------------------------- http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2014/04/on-file-with-butte-county-court-line-12.html
Who are you complaining about?

Are you complaining about an individual or a firm?
Firm

Select the title that best describes the individual or firm that you are complaining about:
Publicly held company

If you are complaining about an entity or individual that has custody or control of your investments, have you had difficulty contacting that entity or individual?
Unknown
Firm Name:
Richard Kinder


Street Address:
UNK
Telephone:


Identifier Type:
Unknown

Are you or were you associated with the individual or firm when the alleged conduct occurred?
No

How are you or were you associated with the individual or firm you are complaining about?
As per my long story I started calling Kinder Morgan Public Relations. This began after CAL FIRE refusal to cooperate with public records. That call triggered local events which I've carefully learned to recognize. I make call about something suspect - I'll get a police response or another punch in the face or someone near me dies. It's that bad. I believe the Kinder Morgan and others to be named later know a great deal more about the following incidents. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dead Attorneys http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2014/06/contra-costa-bar-association-dead.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alicia Driscoll Murder/Suicide (faked in my opinion) learned of Jan 2014 - matched to KM Fire contractor Mountain Cascade Worker in April. Mary Alicia Driscoll Murder Suicide? I don't think so http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2014/04/mary-alicia-driscoll-murder-suicide-i.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ELLEN SABADUQUIA (1950-2005) Witness to the 2004 Walnut Creek Pipeline Explosion http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2014/04/ellen-sabaduquia-1950-2005-witness-to.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------- I cannot provide extensive details without a new laptop- I've had all my servers, assets, computers, cars and cash taken. I am living homeless and even with numerous attempts on my life nothing moves. The suspects in my PGE, KM and other investigations will support a broader suite of allegations that a large insurance fraud operation runs in part from Contra Costa County. The losses are in the billions affecting publicly traded companies asset values. When upon learning connections between a long 30 year history of fires, accidents and worse near me as what has become clear to many in the area - we have too many major catastrophic losses. The attached graphics and presentations are works in progress since the mature versions are trapped on several dead systems. The closer I get who is behind these events the attacks escalate. There appears to be a connection and my information on how these individuals interact is derived from decades of personal setbacks, the CNET arrests, and Seeno Indictments who are connected to a hedge fund that I stated could be support from an underlying fraud with this indictment. http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2014/03/benny-chetcuti-jr-walnut-creek-real.html Walnut Creek Real Estate Investor Indicted For Fraud FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 28, 2014 OAKLAND – A federal grand jury in Oakland yesterday returned a two-count indictment charging Benny Chetcuti, Jr. with wire fraud, stemming from Chetcuti’s Walnut Creek, Calif., based real estate investment business, announced United States Attorney Melinda Haag and FBI Special Agent in Charge David J. Johnson. According to the Indictment, as early as Oct. 2002 and continuing through June 2010, Chetcuti allegedly defrauded private investors who loaned money to him and his business, Chetcuti & Associates. Chetcuti started Chetcuti & Associates in 1998 for the purpose of purchasing homes, renovating them, and selling them within a short time period. Chetcuti financed his business, in part, by obtaining loans from private investors in exchange for promissory notes that were supposed to be secured by interests in real properties. The Indictment alleges that Chetcuti defrauded investors by misrepresenting how much debt was already secured by the properties, falsely promising to record deeds of trust that would have secured the investors’ interests in the properties, directing others to impersonate lenders or title company officers in telephone calls, and forging letters purportedly written by lenders and title company officers. A summons was issued upon filing of the Indictment. Chetcuti is scheduled to make his initial appearance on April 2, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. before the Honorable Kandis A. Westmore, United States Magistrate Court Judge in Oakland. The maximum statutory penalty for each count of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 is 20 years imprisonment and a fine of $250,000, or twice the gross loss or gain resulting from the offenses, plus restitution and forfeiture, if appropriate. However, any sentence following conviction would be imposed by the court only after consideration of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and the federal statute governing the imposition of a sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3553. Andrew S. Huang is the Assistant U.S. Attorney who is prosecuting the case with the assistance of Vanessa Quant. The prosecution is the result of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Please note, an Indictment contains only allegations against a defendant and, as with all defendants, Benny Chetcuti, Jr. must be presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. (Chetcuti indictment ) http://www.justice.gov/usao/can/news/2014/2014_03_28_chetcuti.indicted.press.html There is pattern to how cases are vetted in the District Attorney offices - I've followed Juries, cases and companies for decades. Seeno should have been brought down decades ago. From the 1980s to present I gave the SF FBI information to build a case on what I call the Golden Hand of Contra Costa County. Seene burns down buildings to make money, Chetcuti was running his scam since 1999, Another case is Walter Eng in Lafayette CA (750 Million BK) so between these two cases and dozen others the DA has looked the other way while billions have been lost. You have to wonder why they couldn't have gone after Chetcuti when the first Cease and Desist letter arrived. That's where EBMUD WARD Director Coleman fits - not positive but I think he's the DDA that prosecutes real estate fraud. I can tell no one wants to talk about the KM fire Dead Witnesses but it took me two years of research that kept leading to similar cases by the third year it was clear this county should be renamed Cold Case County operated by investor Swiss Cheese - when you fight you loose over the loop holes not because you're owned money
Products involved

Select the type of product involved in your complaint:
Real Estate

Please select the category that best describes your security product:
Real estate investment trusts

Enter the security/ticker symbol if known:
More later - it ties to previous post -
About you

*Are you submitting this tip, complaint or referral pursuant to the SEC's whistleblower program?
Yes

*Are you submitting this tip, complaint or referral anonymously? Being able to contact you for further information or clarification may be helpful.
No

**Are you represented by an attorney in connection with your submission?
No
Submitter Information

Title:
Mr.

**First Name:
Peter

Middle Name:
Carver

**Last Name:
Bennett


Street Address:
Homeless

City:
Walnut Creek

State / Province:
CA

Zip / Postal Code:
94596

Country:
USA
Home Telephone:
510-460-5641

What is the best way to contact you?
Phone

Select the profession that best represents you:
Other
Whistleblower Declarations

*1. Are you, or were you at the time you acquired the original information you are submitting to us, a member, officer, or employee of the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, any law enforcement organization, or any national securities exchange, registered securities association, registered clearing agency, or the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board?
No

*2. Are you, or were you at the time you acquired the original information you are submitting to us, a member, officer, or employee of a foreign government, any political subdivision, department, agency, or instrumentality of a foreign government, or any other foreign financial regulatory authority as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(52) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78c(a)(52))?
No

*3. Did you acquire the information being submitted to us through the performance of an engagement required under the federal securities laws by an independent public accountant?
No

*4. Are you submitting this information pursuant to a cooperation agreement with the SEC or another agency or organization?
No

*5. Are you a spouse, parent, child, or sibling of a member or employee of the SEC, or do you reside in the same household as a member or employee of the SEC?
No

*7a. Are you submitting this information before you (or anyone representing you) received any investigative request, inquiry, or demand that relates to the subject matter of your submission from the SEC, Congress, or any other federal, state, or local authority, any self regulatory organization, or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board?
Yes

7b. If the answer to question 7a is 'no,' please provide details.
I am the programmer whose collected information who has a target on his back - in 2004 and 05 my connection to the Debate the H-1b visa I was asked to testify in Congress but before I could get there I nearly died in the ER from suspected poisoning,my truck explodes and persons near the visas and outsourcing started getting killed. The US Programmer connected to Job Poaching Anti-Trust was in part started my from opposition on the visas. My concerns over 10 years was information systems would be used to extract and deplete companies. When Matthew Michael Lyon turned up dead last summer that lead to Accenture then to PIMCO who they developed software for then to Paul Clark UBS Bond Trader attends the same Alamo 1st WARD where the billion dollar could linked to the deaths and real estate acquisitions tied to events where homeless that are lviing near their RE Investments under development are being killed, run over and/or permanently maimed costing the State millions. Find Andrea Huseby and Chris Huseby - I believe she's the first dead banker working of IHE - I know the accident patterns well. Her death fits.

*8a. Are you currently a subject or target of a criminal investigation, or have you been convicted of a criminal violation, in connection with the information you are submitting to the SEC?
No

*9a. Did you acquire the information being provided to us from any person described in questions 1 through 8?
Yes

9b. If the answer to question 9a is 'yes,' please provide details about the person from whom you acquired the information.
my information is derived from personal knowledge, understanding how parties I've watched over nearly 40 years morph into billionaires while I've suffered setbacks - it's the Ying and Yang. My information is connected to software projects and several project revealed winning attorneys were winning too often. The CNET case provided litigation to be revealed, the dead witnesses formed the framework for finding more cases and online resources allowed what I already knew to weave together that the club has been getting high level cover and litigants like myself - well we just get beaten up and those incidents added up to that PG&E, Kinder Morgan and others are able to use information systems e.g. large scale long term software changes to defeat the SEC detection systems that in many cases are now operated by outsourcing entities. TI know the H-1b visa is a tool to penetrate companies like Kaiser where the former CTO was in my cub scout den in 2004- like me he was experiencing disruption - shortly after IBM was in control of Kaiser IT and my friends all lost their jobs but I've correlated deaths to those being with Kaiser Patients. The perfect storm is knowing a patients weakness - I survived poison, infections and suspect medical including suspected heart attacks which is how they killed mr. Lyon of Accenture. He's probably a Kaiser patient but Tim Hogan Walnut Creek died of near identical causes in 2010. Lyons knew my attorney, who knew Nate Greenan who knew me who knew others connected to Fremont Capital Partners who know Nearon Properties where David Nearon attempted to pass a forged power attorney on the same street where the only other Limo Fire in the country occurred in front of Alice Roberts (96) - they are probably running an LA Grandma's operation - these operators are simply positioned perfectly in the middle of the perfect storm where they can pretty much cover up suicides like Patricia Noel whose husband was a key person at FoxBoro COntrols who would have deep intimate knowledge of SCADA systems at PG&E. So many are leaving for Tahiti

10. Identify with particularity any documents or other information in your submission that you believe could reasonably be expected to reveal your identity, and explain the basis for your belief that your identity would be revealed if the documents were disclosed to a third party.
I've already been revealed when my trailer was lost to Mormons now connected to the Seeno Indictments and when Walnut Creek Police officers and others stole but returned my laptop. Every letter sent to the US Attorney and FBI has been revealed. They want me dead plain and simple.

*I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the information contained in this submission is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. I fully understand that I may be subject to prosecution and ineligible for a whistleblower award if, in my submission of information, my other dealings with the SEC, or my dealings with another authority in connection with a related action, I knowingly and willfully make any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations, or use any false writing or document knowing that the writing or document contains any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry.
Agree

Share:

The Witness Murder after Bennett meets with City Manager Ken Nordoff and Chief of Walnut Creek Police Joel Bryden regarding Bennett v. Collins

The Connection between the former Walnut Creek Police Department leadership, PG&E, Judge Joel Golub, Former PG&E Senior Counsel Howard V. Golub and the murders of witnesses connected to Bennett.  




Share:

Officer Clemente needs some serious bias training.

A Contra Costa County sheriff’s deputy has resigned after his ex-girlfriend reported to Internal Affairs that he had been texting unprofessional photos from inside the Martinez jail while on duty, KTVU has learned.

MARTINEZ, Calif. - A Contra Costa County sheriff’s deputy has resigned after his ex-girlfriend reported to Internal Affairs that he had been texting unprofessional photos from inside the Martinez jail while on duty, KTVU has learned.

Along with the pictures, which were reviewed by KTVU and confirmed by the deputy's union, Chris Spadaro also called the inmates "dirt balls," "vermin" and "animals" in his texts, and he showed at least one inmate in an ambulance on his way to the hospital, in violation of both sheriff's policy and federal medical privacy laws. 

After 18 years with the department, Spadaro is no longer a member of the union and is no longer employed by the Sheriff’s Office, according to Deputy Sheriffs Association President Shawn Welch.

Spadaro resigned Thursday afternoon, following an IA investigation launched at the end of January by his ex-girlfriend, Reshmika Dayal.
“I think it’s a safety issue,” Dayal told KTVU in an interview on Wednesday, one day before Spadaro resigned. “You're supposed to be watching the prisoners. And while you’re busy taking pictures, someone can get hurt. Another deputy might get hurt because you’re busy taking pictures.”
As for the inmate going to the hospital, Dayal said that’s a clear violation of the person’s federal HIPPA rights.

“I know they’re in jail for a reason,” she said. “They did something wrong. But they also have a right to their own privacy.”

Dayal said she confronted Spadaro about the unprofessionalism of texting her such photos, and he eventually broke up with her in late January after a series of conversations because of the pressure she said she placed on him. She called KTVU and went to Internal Affairs shortly after that. 
Chris Spadaro resigned as a Contra Costa County deputy on Feb. 6, 2020.
Spadaro did not return two phone calls seeking comment. Lawyers from Rain, Lucia and Stern, the firm that used to represent Spadaro for his past employment troubles, also declined a request for an interview. Jimmy Lee, a spokesman for the Sheriff’s Office, declined to comment on behalf of Sheriff David Livingston.


Spadaro’s resignation comes after KTVU published a story on Jan. 9, revealing that Livingston had wanted to fire him after superiors found he lied about a DUI and was purposely avoiding paying his bridge tolls on his way to work in 2016, public records show.  The 103 pages were released almost a year after SB 1421, a police transparency law, took effect. The law now mandates that police agencies disclose personnel files on officers whose superiors found they lied or committed sexual assault or if they caused great body injury or death. Since Spadaro originaly told superiors he only had one beer, and it turned out his blood alcohol content was .14 percent, the records were eventually unsealed.
Livingston also found Spadaro’s conduct “unbecoming of an officer,” especially since Spadaro acknowledged that he didn’t pay his bridge toll on his way from Vacaville to the Martinez Detention Facility every day for nearly half a year.
Reshmika Dayal looks at her phone.

However, Spadaro was able to avoid getting fired with the help of the Rains law firm. He kept his job as long as he agreed to a brief pay reduction and agreed to be on probation for three years. That period hadn’t yet expired.

In addition, four years after he was hired, Spadaro had been named in a sexual harassment civil suit in 2006. According to the suit, he was not the main perpetrator. But in 2008, the county ended up paying $173,000 to the former female deputy who brought the suit. 
Reshmika Dayal came forward to KTVU.

Dayal saw the story about the DUI and the bridge tolls and came forward to KTVU in mid-January. She didn't know about Spadaro's past, and when she confronted him, it seemed to her as if her new boyfriend, whom she began dating in late Novemer, hadn't changed his ways despite his assurances to her that he had.

She also had growing concerns over texts he sent her from the jail between November and January. 

Dayal provided the texts to KTVU, who cross-checked Spadaro’s phone number with public records. Union president Shawn Welch also confirmed that Spadaro had been under investigation for texting the photos.

One photo shows an inmate going to the hospital in an ambulance. Spadaro wrote, “bad guy to hospital” and “murder suspect” on the message he sent to Dayal.

Another text shows a photo of three inmates inside an open area inside the jail. Spadaro wrote: “They’re getting ready for ‘Commissary.’ The dirt balls order junk food and it comes Thursday nights.”

A third photo shows what appears to be handmade weapons used in a fight. Spadaro texted: “4-5 jumped one, (Black on Black) victim pulled a weapon to defend himself.”

In other texts, Spadaro called inmates “animals,” “vermin” and in another, he wrote to Dayal with a smiling selfie of himself, adding later in the text string: “Serial masturbators on this housing unit.”

It's not just Dayal who thought the texts and photos were not OK.

Jess Jollett, executive director of Lift Up Contra Costa, a racial justice coalition of nonprofits and unions, said this attitude toward inmates shows "a larger culture in our nation and in our county about how we view these folks, who are mostly Black, brown and who are poor." She pointed out that 74% of the incarcerated people in Contra Costa County jails are pre-trial, meaning they have not yet been convicted. 
Welch, the union president, also didn’t mince words. “They’re humans,” Welch said of the inmates. “Dehumanizing people is an extremely poor practice. They are people just like us.

Plus, Welch added:  “It’s a violation of our policy. It’s not our job to take pictures of inmates and send them to others outside our jobs.”

Spadaro has not been with the department for 20 years and he is younger than 50 years old, so Welch explained his draw on his pension will be less than what it would have been if he had reached retirement age.
Dayal said it was very hard for her to come forward to Internal Affairs and speak publicly about what Spadaro had done.

Many of her friends have told her to leave well enough alone.
But, she found the photos and texts very “disturbing” and she said she overcame her fears about her own personal safety to make sure that someone who wears the badge is held to the highest of standards.

“I know I’m going to be getting a lot of backlash from people,” she said. “I’m already receiving text messages on my phone that are hateful from friends.”
But, she concluded, she knew what she was seeing wasn’t right.

“What he’s doing is wrong,” she said. “And I’ve been brought up by my mom that if you see something wrong, say it.”

She had hoped her coming forward would mean that Spadaro would lose his job. She was not prepared for the fact that he would resign in the middle of the Internal Affairs investigation.

Dayal said she hoped that by speaking out, other deputies would see that "their job is to protect everybody and that taking advantage of the job, taking pictures, is not something that will be taken lightly.”

Share:

First Republic Bank - The Homeless Programmer of Walnut Creek


Share:

California Code, Penal Code - PEN § 13012 - Officer Dominic Clemente says "Bennett you're mental, while Bennett says his contacts have been murdered"

Where is my police report?  

On December 9th, 2019 Pete Bennett was attacked in the Walnut Creek Public Library this particular incident was located in Civic Park.  During 2014, Pete Bennett filed several claims with the City of Walnut Creek in amounts totaling around $500,000, a similar claim against the Town of Danville in 2005, and similar claims with the City of Pittsburg during incidents occurring during the late eighties.

The following California Penal Code covers nearly every statement by Officer Clemente.  

California Code, Penal Code - PEN § 13012

(a) The information published on the OpenJustice Web portal pursuant to Section 13010 shall contain statistics showing all of the following:
(1) The amount and the types of offenses known to the public authorities.
(2) The personal and social characteristics of criminals and delinquents.
(3) The administrative actions taken by law enforcement, judicial, penal, and correctional agencies or institutions, including those in the juvenile justice system, in dealing with criminals or delinquents.
(4) The administrative actions taken by law enforcement, prosecutorial, judicial, penal, and correctional agencies or institutions, including those in the juvenile justice system, in dealing with minors who are the subject of a petition or hearing in the juvenile court to transfer their case to the jurisdiction of an adult criminal court or whose cases are directly filed or otherwise initiated in an adult criminal court.
(5)(A) The total number of each of the following:
(i) Civilian complaints received by law enforcement agencies under Section 832.5 .
(ii) Civilian complaints alleging criminal conduct of either a felony or a misdemeanor.
(iii) Civilian complaints alleging racial or identity profiling, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 13519.4 .  These statistics shall be disaggregated by the specific type of racial or identity profiling alleged, including, but not limited to, based on a consideration of race, color, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, or mental or physical disability.
(B) The statistics reported pursuant to this paragraph shall provide, for each category of complaint identified under subparagraph (A), the number of complaints within each of the following disposition categories:
(i) “Sustained,” which means that the investigation disclosed sufficient evidence to prove the truth of allegation in the complaint by preponderance of the evidence.
(ii) “Exonerated,” which means that the investigation clearly established that the actions of the personnel that formed the basis of the complaint are not a violation of law or agency policy.
(iii) “Not sustained,” which means that the investigation failed to disclose sufficient evidence to clearly prove or disprove the allegation in the complaint.
(iv) “Unfounded,” which means that the investigation clearly established that the allegation is not true.
(C) The reports under subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall be made available to the public and disaggregated for each individual law enforcement agency.
(b) The department shall give adequate interpretation of the statistics and present the information so that it may be of value in guiding the policies of the Legislature and of those in charge of the apprehension, prosecution, and treatment of criminals and delinquents, or those concerned with the prevention of crime and delinquency.  This interpretation shall be presented in clear and informative formats on the OpenJustice Web portal.  The Web portal shall also include statistics that are comparable with national uniform criminal statistics published by federal bureaus or departments.
(c) Each year, on an annual basis, the Racial and Identity Profiling Advisory Board (RIPA), established pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (j) of Section 13519.4 , shall analyze the statistics reported pursuant to subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (5) of subdivision (a) of this section.  RIPA's analysis of the complaints shall be incorporated into its annual report as required by paragraph (3) of subdivision (j) of Section 13519.4 and shall be published on the OpenJustice Web portal.  The reports shall not disclose the identity of peace officers.

FindLaw Codes are provided courtesy of Thomson Reuters Westlaw, the industry-leading online legal research system. For more detailed codes research information, including annotations and citations, please visit Westlaw.
FindLaw Codes may not reflect the most recent version of the law in your jurisdiction. Please verify the status of the code you are researching with the state legislature or via Westlaw before relying on it for your legal needs.
Share:

Rep. Adam Schiff on Impeachment, Homelessness & Tulsi Gabbard BayAreaHomeless.com

Content Pending very busy since I posted this information

Share:

The Terrorist (Alleged) of Walnut Creek who has tried for 30 years to win in Contra Costa Superior Court

Let's Kill The Witness in the Public Library?

Just moments after yet another near fatal attempted murder Bennett speaks out at Walnut Creek City Hall.


Share:

The No Police Report Attempted Murder Investigation

Mr. Bennett if you want a police report use the Kiosk. 

Be careful not to bleed on how fancy Kiosk

 

Share:

The Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice

For Pete Bennett a witness connected to the Contra Costa County Narcotics Enforcement Taskforce this is what homelessness means to Bennett. How much can you bleed? A lot where are my sons, cars, computers and music gear?






CIVIL RIGHTS




The Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice is responsible for enforcing Federal statutes that prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, and religion. These Federal laws prohibit discrimination in education, employment, credit, housing, public accommodations, voting, and in certain federally-funded and conducted programs, among other areas. In addition, the Division prosecutes actions under several criminal civil rights statutes that are designed to preserve personal liberties and safety. The Division can also seek relief for persons confined in public institutions where existing conditions deprive residents of their constitutional rights. Tribal governments and State and local governments may also have laws or procedures protecting civil rights. The Division does not have the authority to enforce the Indian Civil Rights Act.
The following areas of the Civil Rights Division's enforcement program may be of particular interest to American Indians and Alaska Natives:
How to File a Complaint or Obtain Additional Information
Complaints to the Civil Rights Division should be filed as soon as possible after the alleged act and, in some instances, within 180 days of the date of the alleged discrimination. Complaints should be in writing and signed, and include your name, address, and telephone number(s); the name(s) of any public or private agency, institution, department, or individual you believe discriminated against you; and a description of the conduct you believe violated one of the laws discussed above, with as many details as possible.
For further information, or to file a complaint, contact:
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
Office of the Assistant Attorney General
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530
(202) 514-4609 (Voice)
(202) 514-0716 (TDD)
(202) 307-2839 (Fax)

Share:

The Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice - See Pete Bleed

The Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, created in 1957 by the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1957, works to uphold the civil and constitutional rights of all Americans, particularly some of the most vulnerable members of our society. The Division enforces federal statutes prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, disability, religion, familial status and national origin.
Since its establishment, the Division has grown dramatically in both size and scope, and has played a role in many of the nation's pivotal civil rights battles. Division attorneys prosecuted the defendants accused of murdering three civil rights workers in Mississippi in 1964, and were involved in the investigations of the assassinations of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Medgar Evers. The Division enforces a wide array of laws that protect the civil rights of all individuals.

ORGANIZATION

The Division is led by the Assistant Attorney General. Each Section of the Division is headed by a Section Chief and several Deputy Chiefs and Special Legal or Litigation Counsels. The Division's leadership, Section Chiefs, attorneys, and administrative staff are based in Washington, D.C.
The Division's work is carried out by 11 sections: 
The Division's goals are supported by three cross-sectional working groups:
Indian Working Group

LGBTI Working Group

National Origin Working Group

Share:

U.S. Department of Education > The Office for Civil Rights

U.S. Department of Education

image on discriminationOverview
Educational institutions have a responsibility to protect every student's right to learn in a safe environment free from unlawful discrimination and to prevent unjust deprivations of that right. The Office for Civil Rights enforces several Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, and age in programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance from the Department of Education. It is the mission of the Office for Civil Rights is to ensure equal access to education and to promote educational excellence throughout the nation through vigorous enforcement of civil rights.

This page provides specific and detailed information that will assist you in filing a complaint with the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) at the Department of Education. Please read all of the information below before continuing on to the complaint form. Additional information is available at How OCR Handles Complaints and Questions and Answers on OCR's Complaint Process.

OCR has the authority to investigate complaints claiming a covered entity discriminated based on:
  • race, color, national origin, ethnicity, or ancestry, including a person’s
    • limited English proficiency or English learner status; and
    • actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics, including membership in a religion that may be perceived to exhibit such characteristics (such as Hindu, Jewish, Muslim, and Sikh individuals)
  • sex, including
    • pregnancy or parental status;
    • sex stereotypes (such as treating persons differently because they do not conform to sex-role expectations or because they are attracted to or are in relationships with persons of the same sex); and
  • disability, including those currently without an impairment that substantially limits a major life activity, but who have a record of or are regarded as having a disability; and
  • age.
OCR also has the authority to investigate complaints claiming a covered entity:
  • retaliated for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege protected by the laws enforced by OCR;
  • retaliated because someone made a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an OCR matter; and
  • discriminated against any youth group officially affiliated with a group or organization listed in title 36 of the United States Code (as a patriotic society) that is intended to serve young people under the age of 21 that requests to conduct a meeting at a public school.
Covered entities include all public and private programs that receive Federal funds from the U.S. Department of Education. These include all public schools and most public and private colleges, as well as some other entities, such as vocational rehabilitation agencies and libraries.  For claims of disability discrimination (including disability-related retaliation), covered entities also include all state and local government entities, even if they do not receive Federal funds.
If you believe you have been discriminated or retaliated against on any of these bases by a covered entity, you may file a complaint using either the electronic complaint form or the fillable PDF complaint form linked at the bottom of this page.
If you choose to file a complaint using either method, you will be asked to provide your name, address, and email address; the name and address of the person discriminated against; and the name and address of the entity you believe discriminated.
You also will be asked which of the kinds of discrimination forms the basis for your complaint. You will need to provide a description of the conduct that you believe is discriminatory.
By law, complaints of discrimination must ordinarily be filed within 180 days of the last act of discrimination. If your complaint involves matters that occurred longer ago than this and you are requesting a waiver, you will be asked to show good cause why you did not file your complaint within the 180-day period.
You will be asked whether you have tried to resolve the matter using a grievance procedure or by filing with another agency.
In addition to the complaint, a signed Consent Form may be required. When disclosure of the identity of the complainant is necessary in order to resolve the complaint, OCR will require written consent before proceeding. The complainant will be informed that the complaint will be closed if written consent is necessary in order to resolve the complaint and is not received within 20 calendar days of the date of the acknowledgement letter or the date the Consent Form is requested from the complainant. The signed Consent Form may be submitted to OCR by mail, fax, email (with a scanned attachment), or in person.
When OCR has determined that consent is necessary in order to resolve the complaint and OCR has not received a signed Consent Form by the 15th calendar day of the date of the acknowledgment letter or the date the Consent Form is requested from the complainant, OCR will contact the complainant (e.g., by phone) to inform the complainant that the complaint will be closed if the signed Consent Form is not received within 5 calendar days. If OCR does not receive signed written Consent Form, the complaint will be dismissed, and the complainant informed in writing.
A complainant on behalf of or regarding to another person(s) is responsible for securing any necessary written consent from that individual, including when a parent files for a student over the age of 18. Where the person is a minor (under the age of 18) or a legally incompetent adult, the Consent Form must be signed by that person’s parent or legal guardian. Parental or legal guardian consent may not be required for persons under the age of 18 if they are emancipated under state law and are therefore considered to have obtained majority. Proof of emancipation or incompetence must be provided.
If you submit the completed electronic complaint form, it will be routed to the OCR office with authority to handle complaints in the state where the institution or entity you are complaining about is located. A staff person will contact you once your electronic complaint has been received and reviewed.
If you select the fillable PDF complaint form, once you complete the complaint form and Consent Form, you should print them out, sign them; and mail them (or email scanned copies of the signed forms) to the Enforcement Office with authority for the state where the institution or entity you are complaining about is located. A staff person will contact you once your complaint has been received and reviewed.
You may now continue to either the electronic complaint form or the fillable PDF complaint form, or you may abandon the form and return to the OCR Complaint Process page.
Continue to Electronic Complaint Form or Fillable PDF Complaint Form download filesPDF (228K) 
Share:

Anchor links for post titles

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Labels

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Labels

Recent Posts

Pages

Labels

Blog Archive

Recent Posts