OBIT:ANDREA HUSEBY
DOJ:PG&E Ordered To Develop Compliance And Ethics Program As Part Of Its Sentence For Engaging In Criminal Conduct
Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Northern District of California
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, January 26, 2017
PG&E Ordered To Develop Compliance And Ethics Program As Part Of Its Sentence For Engaging In Criminal Conduct
Five years of probation and fines make up sentence for PG&E’s
violations of the National Gas Pipeline Safety Act and for
Obstructing Agency Proceeding
SAN FRANCISCO— Pacific Gas and Electric Company
(“PG&E”) was sentenced today to submit to an expansive
program of probation after having been found guilty of
multiple willful violations of the Natural Gas Pipeline
Safety Act of 1968 (“PSA”) and obstructing an agency
proceeding, announced U.S. Attorney Brian J. Stretch, San
Mateo County District Attorney Stephen M. Wagstaffe, U.S.
Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General
Special Agent in Charge William Swallow, and FBI Special
Agent in Charge John F. Bennett. Among the provisions
included in the program of probation issued by the Honorable
Thelton E. Henderson, District Judge, are the obligation to
submit to a corporate compliance and ethics monitorship, the
obligation to complete 10,000 hours of community service,
and the requirement to spend up to $3 million to inform the
public in print advertisements and television commercials to
notify the public of the utility’s criminal and neglectful
behavior.
On August 9, 2016, after a 5 ½ week trial, a federal jury
found PG&E guilty of multiple willful violations of the
PSA and obstructing an agency proceeding. The
PSA-related charges stem from PG&E’s record keeping and
pipeline “integrity management” practices and were uncovered
in the course of the San Bruno investigation. The
obstruction charge was added after investigators discovered
PG&E attempted to mislead the National Transportation
Safety Board (NTSB) during its investigation. The
evidence at trial demonstrated that, between 2007 and 2010,
PG&E willfully failed to address recordkeeping
deficiencies concerning its larger natural gas pipelines
knowing that its records were inaccurate or
incomplete. The evidence further demonstrated that
PG&E willfully failed to identify threats to its larger
natural gas pipelines and to take appropriate actions to
investigate the seriousness of threats to pipelines when
they were identified. In addition, PG&E willfully
failed to adequately prioritize as high risk and properly
assess threatened pipelines after they were over
pressurized, as the PSA and its regulations required.
These charges were filed in an indictment on April 1,
2014. In finding PG&E guilty, the jury concluded
the company knowingly and willfully violated the PSA and its
regulations between 2007 and 2010. The jury
found PG&E guilty of six felony counts—five willful
violations of the PSA and one count of corruptly obstructing
the federal investigation into the 2010 fatal pipeline
explosion in San Bruno, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §
1505. The jury acquitted PG&E of an additional six
alleged violations of the PSA.
The charge of obstructing an agency proceeding was included
in a superseding indictment filed July 29, 2014. The
evidence at trial demonstrated that during the course of the
NTSB’s investigation, PG&E provided a version of a
policy outlining the way in which PG&E addressed
manufacturing threats on its pipelines, and then sought to
withdraw the document. According to PG&E’s letter,
the policy was produced in error and was an unapproved
draft. In finding PG&E guilty of obstructing an
agency proceeding, the jury concluded PG&E intentionally
and corruptly tried to influence, obstruct, or impede the
NTSB investigation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1505.
“Today, the Pacific Gas and Electric Company was sentenced
for its crimes after having been found guilty of violating
federal regulations designed to keep our citizens safe and
obstructing an agency proceeding,” said U.S. Attorney
Stretch. “As a part of the sentence, the court has imposed
upon PG&E a monitor to ensure the company’s future
compliance with the rules and regulations the company has
chosen in the past to flaunt. As we know from the
horrible explosion in San Bruno in 2010, the failure of
PG&E to deliver gas safely can have devastating
consequences that no amount of fines and no monetary
penalties can ever remedy. While the conviction and
sentence in this case will not bring back those who were
lost on September 9, 2010, or eliminate the suffering of
their surviving family members, it does take necessary steps
toward ensuring PG&E will never again engage in this
type of criminal behavior that puts all of its customers at
substantial risk. I would like to acknowledge the many
public servants—including the men and women of this office,
the California Attorney General’s Office, the San Mateo
County District Attorney’s Office, the San Bruno Police
Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Inspector
General—whose hard work uncovered PG&E’s violations of
the law and the company’s efforts to obstruct the
investigation. We are gratified that the verdicts and
sentence memorialize PG&E’s criminal conduct.”
“Today’s sentencing of PG&E makes clear the solemn
obligation that those entrusted with the public’s safety
must make it their highest priority,” said William Swallow,
regional Special Agent-in-Charge, USDOT OIG. “The
pipeline system is a critical part of our Nation’s
infrastructure, and working with our Federal, state and
local law enforcement and prosecutorial colleagues, we will
continue to protect the safety and integrity of our
transportation infrastructure from fraud, waste, abuse and
violations of law.”
“The residents of San Mateo County are indebted to the
public servants of the Office of the United States
Attorney,” said District Attorney Wagstaffe. “We are very
thankful for their hard work and perseverance without which
we would not have seen such a successful conclusion to this
case.”
"The FBI San Francisco Division echoes the sentiments of our
law enforcement and prosecutorial partners. PG&E
demonstrated a lack of concern and irresponsibility to our
community,” said FBI San Francisco Special Agent in Charge
Jack Bennett. “We have a responsibility not only to uphold
and enforce the laws of the United States but also to do
everything within our power to protect our citizen’s and our
community. This sentence is symbolic of the FBI’s commitment
to serving justice and to show that no company is too large
to be held accountable for criminal acts.”
In handing down the $3 million monetary penalty, Judge
Henderson ordered PG&E to pay the maximum statutory
penalty allowable for each count charged under the PSA and
for obstruction of justice. In addition to the
monetary penalty, Judge Henderson ordered PG&E to the
maximum term of five years’ probation. While on
probation, PG&E will submit to a corporate compliance
and ethics monitorship, pay for advertising in national
media outlets to publicize its criminal conduct, and engage
in community service.
Judge Henderson ordered PG&E to develop within the first
six months “an effective compliance and ethics program” as
well as a schedule for implementation of the program.
Judge Henderson’s order directs PG&E to create a program
that will prevent criminal conduct with respect to gas
pipeline transmission safety. In addition, during the
five-year period, PG&E will be supervised by a
Compliance and Ethics Monitor whose job it will be to
approve the program, oversee PG&E’s compliance with the
program, inspect PG&E’s records, and receive
notifications from PG&E regarding any changes in the
company’s financial status.
With respect to publicity, Judge Henderson ordered PG&E
to spend $3 million to publicize “the nature of the offenses
it committed, the convictions, the nature of the punishment
imposed and the steps that will be taken to prevent the
recurrence of similar offences.” The $3 million
expenditure will include two parts. PG&E must
purchase a full page advertisement in both the Wall Street
Journal and the San Francisco Chronicle. Also,
PG&E was ordered to purchase television time to air
commercials “to the greatest extent possible replicating the
same channels and air times that PG&E used” in the time
period around when the case was being tried.
Judge Henderson also ordered PG&E to engage in 10,000
hours of community service that must be pre-approved by a
federal probation officer. Of the 10,000 hours, 2,000
must be completed by “high level” employees. In
addition, Judge Henderson stated his expectation that the
planned community service would be approved only if is
separate from, and in addition to, service that PG&E
already had planned to do. Judge Henderson also
advised PG&E that he expected the community service
would be completed, to the greatest extent possible, in San
Bruno.
Assistant United States Attorneys Hallie Hoffman, Jeff
Schenk, and Hartley West prosecuted the case with the
assistance of Denise Oki, Beth Margen, Maryam Beros, Alycee
Lane, Bridget Kilkenny, and Maureen French. The
prosecution is the result of an investigation conducted by
the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of
California, the California Attorney General’s Office, the
San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office, the United
States Department of Transportation Office of Inspector
General, the FBI, the Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety
Administration, and the City of San Bruno Police
Department.
Attachment(s):
Topic(s):
Financial Fraud
Component(s):
Updated January 27, 2017
SAN FRANCISCO— Pacific Gas and Electric Company (“PG&E”) was sentenced today to submit to an expansive program of probation after having been found guilty of multiple willful violations of the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968 (“PSA”) and obstructing an agency proceeding, announced U.S. Attorney Brian J. Stretch, San Mateo County District Attorney Stephen M. Wagstaffe, U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General Special Agent in Charge William Swallow, and FBI Special Agent in Charge John F. Bennett. Among the provisions included in the program of probation issued by the Honorable Thelton E. Henderson, District Judge, are the obligation to submit to a corporate compliance and ethics monitorship, the obligation to complete 10,000 hours of community service, and the requirement to spend up to $3 million to inform the public in print advertisements and television commercials to notify the public of the utility’s criminal and neglectful behavior.
On August 9, 2016, after a 5 ½ week trial, a federal jury found PG&E guilty of multiple willful violations of the PSA and obstructing an agency proceeding. The PSA-related charges stem from PG&E’s record keeping and pipeline “integrity management” practices and were uncovered in the course of the San Bruno investigation. The obstruction charge was added after investigators discovered PG&E attempted to mislead the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) during its investigation. The evidence at trial demonstrated that, between 2007 and 2010, PG&E willfully failed to address recordkeeping deficiencies concerning its larger natural gas pipelines knowing that its records were inaccurate or incomplete. The evidence further demonstrated that PG&E willfully failed to identify threats to its larger natural gas pipelines and to take appropriate actions to investigate the seriousness of threats to pipelines when they were identified. In addition, PG&E willfully failed to adequately prioritize as high risk and properly assess threatened pipelines after they were over pressurized, as the PSA and its regulations required. These charges were filed in an indictment on April 1, 2014. In finding PG&E guilty, the jury concluded the company knowingly and willfully violated the PSA and its regulations between 2007 and 2010. The jury found PG&E guilty of six felony counts—five willful violations of the PSA and one count of corruptly obstructing the federal investigation into the 2010 fatal pipeline explosion in San Bruno, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1505. The jury acquitted PG&E of an additional six alleged violations of the PSA.
The charge of obstructing an agency proceeding was included in a superseding indictment filed July 29, 2014. The evidence at trial demonstrated that during the course of the NTSB’s investigation, PG&E provided a version of a policy outlining the way in which PG&E addressed manufacturing threats on its pipelines, and then sought to withdraw the document. According to PG&E’s letter, the policy was produced in error and was an unapproved draft. In finding PG&E guilty of obstructing an agency proceeding, the jury concluded PG&E intentionally and corruptly tried to influence, obstruct, or impede the NTSB investigation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1505.
“Today, the Pacific Gas and Electric Company was sentenced for its crimes after having been found guilty of violating federal regulations designed to keep our citizens safe and obstructing an agency proceeding,” said U.S. Attorney Stretch. “As a part of the sentence, the court has imposed upon PG&E a monitor to ensure the company’s future compliance with the rules and regulations the company has chosen in the past to flaunt. As we know from the horrible explosion in San Bruno in 2010, the failure of PG&E to deliver gas safely can have devastating consequences that no amount of fines and no monetary penalties can ever remedy. While the conviction and sentence in this case will not bring back those who were lost on September 9, 2010, or eliminate the suffering of their surviving family members, it does take necessary steps toward ensuring PG&E will never again engage in this type of criminal behavior that puts all of its customers at substantial risk. I would like to acknowledge the many public servants—including the men and women of this office, the California Attorney General’s Office, the San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office, the San Bruno Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General—whose hard work uncovered PG&E’s violations of the law and the company’s efforts to obstruct the investigation. We are gratified that the verdicts and sentence memorialize PG&E’s criminal conduct.”
“Today’s sentencing of PG&E makes clear the solemn obligation that those entrusted with the public’s safety must make it their highest priority,” said William Swallow, regional Special Agent-in-Charge, USDOT OIG. “The pipeline system is a critical part of our Nation’s infrastructure, and working with our Federal, state and local law enforcement and prosecutorial colleagues, we will continue to protect the safety and integrity of our transportation infrastructure from fraud, waste, abuse and violations of law.”
“The residents of San Mateo County are indebted to the public servants of the Office of the United States Attorney,” said District Attorney Wagstaffe. “We are very thankful for their hard work and perseverance without which we would not have seen such a successful conclusion to this case.”
"The FBI San Francisco Division echoes the sentiments of our law enforcement and prosecutorial partners. PG&E demonstrated a lack of concern and irresponsibility to our community,” said FBI San Francisco Special Agent in Charge Jack Bennett. “We have a responsibility not only to uphold and enforce the laws of the United States but also to do everything within our power to protect our citizen’s and our community. This sentence is symbolic of the FBI’s commitment to serving justice and to show that no company is too large to be held accountable for criminal acts.”
In handing down the $3 million monetary penalty, Judge Henderson ordered PG&E to pay the maximum statutory penalty allowable for each count charged under the PSA and for obstruction of justice. In addition to the monetary penalty, Judge Henderson ordered PG&E to the maximum term of five years’ probation. While on probation, PG&E will submit to a corporate compliance and ethics monitorship, pay for advertising in national media outlets to publicize its criminal conduct, and engage in community service.
Judge Henderson ordered PG&E to develop within the first six months “an effective compliance and ethics program” as well as a schedule for implementation of the program. Judge Henderson’s order directs PG&E to create a program that will prevent criminal conduct with respect to gas pipeline transmission safety. In addition, during the five-year period, PG&E will be supervised by a Compliance and Ethics Monitor whose job it will be to approve the program, oversee PG&E’s compliance with the program, inspect PG&E’s records, and receive notifications from PG&E regarding any changes in the company’s financial status.
With respect to publicity, Judge Henderson ordered PG&E to spend $3 million to publicize “the nature of the offenses it committed, the convictions, the nature of the punishment imposed and the steps that will be taken to prevent the recurrence of similar offences.” The $3 million expenditure will include two parts. PG&E must purchase a full page advertisement in both the Wall Street Journal and the San Francisco Chronicle. Also, PG&E was ordered to purchase television time to air commercials “to the greatest extent possible replicating the same channels and air times that PG&E used” in the time period around when the case was being tried.
Judge Henderson also ordered PG&E to engage in 10,000 hours of community service that must be pre-approved by a federal probation officer. Of the 10,000 hours, 2,000 must be completed by “high level” employees. In addition, Judge Henderson stated his expectation that the planned community service would be approved only if is separate from, and in addition to, service that PG&E already had planned to do. Judge Henderson also advised PG&E that he expected the community service would be completed, to the greatest extent possible, in San Bruno.
Assistant United States Attorneys Hallie Hoffman, Jeff Schenk, and Hartley West prosecuted the case with the assistance of Denise Oki, Beth Margen, Maryam Beros, Alycee Lane, Bridget Kilkenny, and Maureen French. The prosecution is the result of an investigation conducted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California, the California Attorney General’s Office, the San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office, the United States Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General, the FBI, the Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety Administration, and the City of San Bruno Police Department.
Blum Capital Partners Announces Hires
Blum Capital Partners Announces Hires
“We are fortunate to have professionals as accomplished as Peter and Carol join our team”Tweet this
Contacts
KKR Appoints Arun Sarin as Senior Advisor
KKR Appoints Arun Sarin as Senior Advisor
Established in 1976, KKR is a leading global alternative asset manager. KKR's franchise is sponsoring and managing funds that make investments in private equity, fixed income and other assets in North America, Europe, Asia and the Middle East. Throughout its history, KKR has brought a long-term investment approach, focusing on working in partnership with management teams of its portfolio companies and investing for future competitiveness and growth. KKR has $37.5 billion in private equity assets under management and $13.3 billion in credit assets under management as of June 30, 2009 through various private and publicly traded funds and separately managed accounts. KKR also carries out capital markets activities through its broker dealer subsidiaries. KKR has offices in New York, Menlo Park, San Francisco, Houston, Washington, D.C., London, Paris, Hong Kong, Tokyo, Beijing, Mumbai, Dubai and Sydney. More information about KKR is available at: www.kkr.com.
Media Contacts
AMERICAS
EMEA
ASIA-PACIFIC
INVESTOR RELATIONS
US Attorney General John Ashcroft and the Murdered Mormons
Instructor at the FBI West Coast Bomb School.
Noteable cases were Judi bari Bommbing
John Ashcroft
AKA John David Ashcroft
Born: 9-May-1942
Birthplace: Chicago, IL
Gender: Male
Religion: Born-Again Christian [1]
Race or Ethnicity: White
Sexual orientation: Straight
Occupation: Politician
Party Affiliation: Republican
Nationality: United States
Executive summary: US Attorney General, 2001-05
More than merely a cliché, John Ashcroft really is holier than thou. His grandfather and father were both evangelical preachers, and Rev Ashcroft's household had strict rules. Movies, for example, were not allowed, because even in the 1940s and '50s the Ashcrofts did not approve of Hollywood's liberal lifestyles. In high school, Ashcroft worked at the local Dairy Queen, but he says he never attended a dance or had premarital sex, and he does not swear, smoke, or drink alcoholic beverages. He has refused to participate in raffles, even to support conservative causes, because he does not gamble.
Ashcroft studied law at Yale, and promptly secured a position teaching law at Southwest Missouri State University -- a job which carried the perk of immunity from the Vietnam era draft. He was appointed state auditor in 1973, and promoted to assistant attorney general in 1975. He was elected state attorney general in 1976, and held that office until 1985, when he was elected Governor of Missouri. As Governor, he vetoed a bill that would have allowed liquor sales on Sundays, and another act that would have permitted a smidgen of alcohol in candy. In vetoing funding for an AIDS care center, he was quoted saying, "Well, they're there because of their own misconduct, and it wasn't very reputable misconduct, either."
Ashcroft was elected to the US Senate in 1994, where he opposed condom distribution and needle-exchange programs, and once waved a sonogram of his unborn grandchild as an argument against federal funding for abortions. He became one of the first politicians to advocate federal funding for "faith-based programs", and earned perfect marks from the Christian Coalition. When asked whether he had any problem legislating morality, Ashcroft once explained, "I think all we should legislate is morality. We shouldn't legislate immorality." On a break from Washington, Ashcroft returned to his Missouri estate in 1997, where he says he saw a flock of bald eagles flying across the sunrise, and felt God's inspiration to write his famous love ballad to America, "Let the eagle soar."
Running for a second Senate term in 2000, Ashcroft lost to Mel Carnahan, who had been killed in a plane crash three weeks before the election. Carnahan's wife was appointed to take her husband's seat, and as Ashcroft's consolation prize he was appointed US Attorney General by George W. Bush, a job that made him the nation's highest law enforcement officer.
After September 11, 2001, Ashcroft was generally credited as 'architect' of the PATRIOT Act, which established several short cuts to circumvent such traditional and constitutional safeguards as search warrants and judicial oversight of police. Ashcroft authorized secret arrests and detentions, expanded wiretapping, blocked Freedom of Information Act requests, OK'd eavesdropping on defense lawyers and infiltration of political protest groups. He tried to organize a nationwide "tips" line for mail carriers, home repairmen, delivery drivers and others whose occupations bring them in contact with the general public to report suspicious activity. For all this effort, however, Ashcroft had surprisingly few successful prosecutions against terrorists, and the Justice Dept was caught several times playing "shell games" with the numbers. For example, crimes such as writing bad checks or protesters trespassing on a Navy base were listed as "terror convictions", despite having no cited connection to any acts of terrorism.
Prior to Ashcroft's appointment, the Justice Department's pornography prosecutions were almost exclusively child pornography, but Ashcroft oversaw a self-described War on Pornography. At least half a dozen agents were assigned to monitor on-line pornography full-time, forty hours a week surfing the internet and taking notes. Dozens of prosecutors were assigned to a special anti-porn office, and Ashcroft publicly complained that pornography "invades our homes persistently though the mail, phone, VCR, cable TV and the Internet," and "has strewn its victims from coast to coast". Under Ashcroft, the Justice Dept prosecuted filmmakers for fictional videos that included rape scenes, waged battle against the makers of HBO's Real Sex, and threatened companies that supply 'erotica' films available for rent in most American hotels.
Despite his long-time support for "state's rights", he brought federal action against Oregon's law allowing assisted suicide, and against California's law allowing medicinal use of marijuana. Uncomfortable with the bare-breasted statue called "Spirit of Justice" in Justice Department headquarters, he ordered the statue covered. As Attorney General, he held daily devotions in his office, with senior staff members "invited" to attend. He also distributed photocopied lyrics to "Let the Eagles Soar", asking department heads and other high-level Justice Department officials to sing along with him.
He has said he was anointed with oil "in the manner of King David" as he took each successive political office in his career. When he became a Senator his father anointed him with Crisco brand cooking oil, and died the next day. Before becoming Attorney General, Ashcroft had Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas do the anointing.
Since leaving the Bush administration, Ashcroft has pursued his first private sector employment since his Dairy Queen days -- his services are now available as a lobbyist. His clients include Choicepoint, Israel Aircraft Industries International, and Oracle Corporation. His fees reportedly start in the low hundreds of thousands of dollars, and apparently he is worth every penny -- with his contacts deep inside the Bush administration, Ashcroft has had remarkable success securing his clients' interests in Washington.
His wife, Janet Ashcroft, is on the Board of Trustees at Patrick Henry College, a fundamentalist Christian college. Its stated goals include producing graduates "who will lead our nation and shape our culture with timeless biblical values". The school is not accredited, but since its founding in 1998, dozens of its students have served internships under Republican Congressmen, Senators, and in the Bush-Cheney White House.
[1] Assemblies of God (Pentecostal).
Father: J. Robert Ashcroft (preacher)
Mother: Grace Ashcroft
Brother: (older)
Brother: (younger)
Wife: Janet Elise Roede Ashcroft (m. 1967)
Daughter: Martha Grace Patterson (attorney)
Son: John Robert Ashcroft (teacher)
Son: Andrew David Ashcroft (US Navy)
High School: Hillcrest High School, Springfield, MO (1960)
University: BA, Yale University (1964)
Law School: JD, University of Chicago (1967)
Teacher: Business Law, Southwest Missouri State University, Springfield MO
Administrator: Board of Reference, Oral Roberts University
Blackwater Chair of Ethics Committee (2011-)
US Attorney General (2001-04)
US Senator, Missouri (1995-2001)
Governor of Missouri (1985-93)
Attorney General of Missouri (1977-84)
Missouri State Official Assistant Attorney General (1975-77)
Missouri State Auditor (1973-75)
American Compass
Council for National Policy
Federalist Society
John McCain 2008
McCain-Palin Compliance Fund
Sigma Tau Gamma Fraternity honorary
Dairy Queen Springfield, MO (age 13)
Draft Deferment: Vietnam
Born-Again Christian
Traveled to the USSR Dec-1991
Cholecystectomy (Mar-2004)
US Big Brother Award Worst Public Official or Department 2002
Sued by the ACLU (6-Aug-2003)
Funeral: Ronald Reagan (2004)
Norwegian Ancestry
Rotten Library Page:
John Ashcroft
Appears on the cover of:
US News and World Report, 26-Jan-2004, DETAILS: The Real John Ashcroft -- America's top cop is loved and hated. Here's what makes him tick
Victim: Nathaniel Greenan
|
Wells Fargo Suicide
- NEWS
- SAN DIEGO
Boyfriend Of Slain Woman Jumps Off Bay Bridge As Police Watch
The boyfriend, Darion Sable, had told police that Jerusha Briley, 20, disappeared Saturday morning while going to buy groceries for her 23-month-old son, Gabriel.
Sable jumped off an approach to the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Tuesday afternoon, San Francisco police spokesman Dewayne Tully said. He fell about 100 feet, landing on pavement in a fenced-in area.
Fifteen minutes earlier and five blocks away, Sable had been released on his own recognizance after being jailed overnight on a drug charge, police confirmed.
Police had followed Sable after his release to see where he was going to go and to see if he would lead them to any new information in Briley's death, Sgt. James Deignan of the San Francisco Police Department.
Police said they originally thought Sable was going to try to hitchhike, but contacted the California Highway Patrol when he continued to walk onto the bridge. They said Sable probably did not know he was being followed and that they had no time to stop him from jumping.
Homicide Inspector Tony Casillas wouldn't say whether police had told Sable he was a suspect in his girlfriend's death before letting him go.
"The investigation is still in its primary stages," he said. "Everyone is innocent until proven guilty."
Sgt. Doug Pittman of the Marin County Sheriff's Office said Sable was a suspect in Briley's death, but had not been singled out as the primary suspect. He said the sheriff's office is not yet focusing on one person as a suspect.
Police also haven't determined what killed Briley, whose body was found Monday along Highway 1 about five miles north of Muir Beach in Marin County. Footprints and tiremarks found in the gravel were being studied.
Family members were told Tuesday that the body had been identified as Briley's. Her childhood friend and Gabriel's godmother, Devon Rath, told The Associated Press that the family was too distraught to comment.
Sable had called police Saturday to report Briley missing, saying she wasn't the type to leave the house, let alone her toddler, for more than a few hours without letting people know where she was.
Friends said Briley had been weaning Gabriel off breast-feeding and was making calls to invite people to his birthday party two weeks from now. The sheriff's office would not comment on the relationship between Sable and Briley's son.
Sable told missing persons investigators that Briley had been seeing a counselor for "possible depression," but that he had no more information on the subject.
But Rath told a different story to the San Francisco Examiner - that Briley was getting counseling to improve her relationship with her boyfriend and thereby provide her son with a healthy family.
"If she wanted to get away from it all, she would have called someone," her 15-year-old sister, Naomi Briley, told the Examiner. "If she had problems, she would have called someone to take the baby."
Roger Stone Poisoned with POLONIUM
Alexander Litvinenko poisoning[edit]
Timeline of Lugovoy involvement in Litvinenko poisoning[edit]
- On 30 November 2006, Georgian tycoon Badri Patarkatsishvili described Lugovoy as a "close friend" with whom he had been working for thirteen years. He said he hoped Lugovoy was innocent, but added that there is "no such thing as a former KGB agent."
- On 4 December 2006, Lugovoy visited a hospital in Moscow for medical tests.
- On 9 December 2006, Lugovoy was released from the hospital and declared to be in "satisfactory condition."[7]
- On 26 January 2007, The Guardian reported that the British government was preparing an extradition request asking that Lugovoy be returned to the United Kingdom to stand trial for Litvinenko's murder.[8]
- On 5 February 2007, Boris Berezovsky told the BBC that on his deathbed, Litvinenko said that Lugovoy was responsible for his poisoning.[9]
- On 22 May 2007, Britain's Director of Public Prosecutions announced that Britain would seek extradition of Lugovoy and attempt to charge him with murdering Litvinenko. Russia has previously stated that it has no right to allow the extradition of any Russian citizen for trial in Britain.[10]
- On 28 May 2007, the British Foreign Office formally submitted a request for Lugovoy's extradition to the Russian Government.[11] This was confirmed by both the British embassy in Moscowand the Russian prosecution office.
- Lugovoy is quoted as saying he is a "victim not a perpetrator of a radiation attack", and he has called the charges "politically motivated".
- The Constitution of Russia, like that of France, Germany, Austria, China, and Japan, forbids extradition of its citizens to foreign countries (Art. 61), so the request cannot be fulfilled.[12]Russian citizens can be convicted of crimes committed abroad by Russian courts if foreign law agencies provide necessary evidence.
- On 31 May 2007, Lugovoy held a news conference at which he accused MI6 of attempting to recruit him and blamed either MI6, the Russian mafia, or fugitive Kremlin opponent Boris Berezovsky for the killing.[13]
- On 4 July 2007, Russia formally declined a UK request to extradite Lugovoy.[14]