The Anatomy of Public Corruption

CHAPTER 10. PRIVATE PARKING LOTS

Benny Chetcuti Jr. Walnut Creek Real Estate Investor Indicted For Fraud
By Pete Bennett CNET Scandal Date: March 3rd, 2014


6-10.01 Definitions.

a. "Business hours" mean the period from one hour before a business is open for customers until the business’ closing time for customers. For parking spaces designated for users of automated teller machines, or for employee, tenant or other non-customer reserved parking, "business hours" shall mean 24 hours a day.
b. "Mail-in parking fee" or "mail-in parking charge" means a charge for parking in an offstreet parking lot affixed to a vehicle whose driver is not authorized by signs to park in the offstreet parking lot for no fee.
c. "Notice of a parking charge" means a written document affixed to a vehicle which notifies the vehicle driver of a mail-in parking fee that is due as a result of unauthorized parking in an offstreet parking lot.
d. "Offstreet parking lot" means privately owned property that is generally held open to the public, or a discernible portion thereof, for the parking of vehicles at no fee.
e. "Person" shall mean any natural person, firm, company, corporation, partnership, or association.
f. "Private parking operator" means any person who owns or controls, or person who acts on behalf of or at the behest of a person who owns or controls, an offstreet parking lot. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02 and by 1§, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)

6-10.02 Compliance with This Chapter.

It shall be unlawful, and an unfair business practice within the meaning of Business and Professions Code Section 17200 for any person in an offstreet parking lot to charge a mail-in parking fee, or to issue or cause to be issued a notice of parking charge that is not in compliance with this chapter. Any notice of parking charge that is not in compliance with this chapter shall be invalid. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02 and by §1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03).

6-10.03 Mail-in Fees, Issuance of Notices of Parking Charges.

a. During normal business hours a private parking operator may charge a mail-in parking fee to owners of vehicles parked in the lot without authorization.
b. Where an offstreet parking lot of a closed business is in actual use for valet parking by an off-site business which is open for business and while valet parking is occurring additional signs are posted prohibiting all public parking a private parking operator may charge a mail-in parking fee to owners of vehicles parked in the lot without authorization.
c. Where an offstreet parking lot of a closed business utilizes a lock-box or other device requiring payment before parking, a private parking operator may charge a mail-in parking fee to owners of vehicles parked in the lot without authorization.
d. Except as provided in subsection (b) and (c), no mail-in parking fee shall be charged by a private parking operator outside of normal business hours for parking spaces designated for customer parking only during business hours. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02 and by §1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)

6-10.04 Amount of Fee.

No mail-in parking fee charged pursuant to this chapter shall exceed the initial amount of bail for violation of Municipal Code Section 4-6.301 (signed private parking) which currently is $20. No late charge or other fee shall be imposed unless expressly authorized by a resolution of the City Council. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00 §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02 and by §1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)

6-10.05 Additional Requirements-Signs

In addition to meeting the requirements of section 6-10.03 signs shall be posted as required by this section.
a. No mail-in parking fee shall be charged and no notice of parking charge shall be issued unless there are in place signs substantially in the form required by this chapter.
b. Signs shall contain a statement that the parking is restricted. For example:
"Parking for XXX Customers Only"
"Free Parking for XXX Customers Only"
"This Space Reserved for XXX"
"Parking for Tenants Only"
"Pay at Lock-box when Store Closed"
"Parking Lot Closed-Valet Parking Only"
c. Signs shall contain a statement with the fee for unauthorized parking. For example:
"All Unauthorized Parking $20"
" Immediate $20 Fee for Unauthorized Parking"
d. Signs shall contain a statement with the hours the parking restrictions are in force during which a mail-in parking fee may be charged. For example:
"$20 Fee Enforced During All Business Hours"
"Reserved Parking Restrictions Enforced 24 Hours A Day"
"Pay at Lock-box when Store Closed"
e. Signs must be posted at each entrance and exit to the lot, and must be visible from each restricted parking space. Where different restrictions apply to parking spaces with common entrances and exits, the restrictions applicable to each space shall be clearly delineated. The sign at each entrance shall include text or a symbol, to the approval of the Community Development Director, indicating that the offstreet parking lot has been certified by the City to allow private enforcement of parking controls within the lot.
f. The Community Development Director is hereby authorized to establish uniform sign sizes, colors, sizes of lettering, and other information that may be required on all signs in order to be in compliance with this section. If the Director establishes such criteria, all signs required by this chapter shall be brought into compliance within 60 days. The Director may authorize signs that vary from subsections (b) through (d), and such signs shall be deemed to be in compliance with this section.
g. Signs which indicate that a customer may park for no fee shall indicate whether the authorized parking is only for the time the customer is on the premises or whether it is for a limited duration of time. In the absence of such designation, a customer shall not be charged a mail-in parking fee.
h. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to modify the requirements Municipal Code Section 4-6.301 imposes on persons who seek to have the vehicles towed or have the City of Walnut Creek issue citations. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00; §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02 and by §1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)

6-10.06 Notice of Parking Charges.

a. No person shall place on any vehicle a notice of a parking charge which does not contain at the top of the notice in at least 12 point print the words "INVOICE" followed by "PARKING FEE IMPOSED BY XXX," inserting the name and street address of the business whose customers are designated to use the customer only parking during normal business hours.
b. No person shall place on any vehicle a notice of a parking charge which does not contain in at least 10 point print the listed Walnut Creek telephone number of the business whose customers are designated to use the customer only parking.
c. Where the reserved parking space is for someone other than a customer, the information required by subsection (a) and (b) shall be replaced with the corresponding information of the person who owns or controls the reserved parking space.
d. Every notice of parking charge shall end with the legend "This parking charge notice is not issued by the City of Walnut Creek." This provision shall be in a least 12 point print.
e. No notice of parking charge shall display any feature that resembles a City of Walnut Creek parking citation. The notice of parking charge shall be a color distinctive from a City parking citation. The Chief of Police shall approve the color or colors of the notice of parking charge.
f. Every notice of parking charge shall state that the business identified in subsection (a) may cancel the mail-in parking charge at any time for any reason. The categorical refusal of the business identified in subsection (a) to review a notice of parking charge upon request shall void the mail in parking fee.
g. Every notice of parking charge shall provide fair notice of the dispute resolution procedure described in §6-10.08. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02) and by (§1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)

6-10.07 Registration of Private Parking Operators and Certification of Offstreet Parking Lots.

a. Every private parking operator who issues notices of parking charges shall register with the Community Development Director before doing business in City of Walnut Creek. In addition to the information required by this section, the Community Development Director may require such other information as may enable the Director to determine compliance with this chapter. The fee for registering and amending the registration shall be set by City Council resolution.
b. The registration shall include the name, address and telephone number of the private parking operator, the names, home and business addresses and telephone numbers of each person owning 10% or more of the business, and the Walnut Creek business license number of the business.
c. The registration shall also include a list of all offstreet parking lots where mail-in parking fees are charged, which shall be updated prior to any new lot being added or within one month of any lot being dropped, along with the name, address and telephone number of each contact person or person authorized to resolve disputes for each offstreet parking lot.
d. Every private parking operator shall maintain for at least one year a list by offstreet parking lot of the notices of parking charges issued for each offstreet parking lot. This list shall be broken down by date, and for each date shall show the time, the parking violation and the license number of the vehicle issued the notice of parking charge. Upon request, these records or copies of these records shall be furnished to the Community Development Director.
e. On and after July 1, 2003 no notice of parking charge shall be issued in an offstreet parking lot unless the signing for the offstreet parking lot has been certified as being in compliance with this chapter. The Community Development Director shall do the certification. The frequency of the certification and the charge for certification of parking lots shall be fixed by resolution of the City Council. The certification may be withdrawn or suspended by the Director following notice and opportunity for a hearing if (i) the signing for the offstreet parking lot is found to be out of compliance with this chapter, (ii) if private parking charges are found to have been issued in violation of this chapter for parking in the lot, or (iii) if the private parking lot operator engaged in any other acts or omissions constituting a violation of this chapter with relation to the offstreet parking lot.
f. Any private parking lot owner aggrieved by a decision of the Director under subsection (e) may, within five business days of receipt of the decision, appeal the decision in writing to the City Manager who shall, following a hearing affirm, reverse or modify the decision of the Director. The decision of the City Manager shall be final. Upon the final administrative determination to suspend or withdraw the certification of an offstreet parking lot, the text or symbol indicating certification of the lot shall be immediately removed. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02) and by (§1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)

6-10.08 Dispute Resolution.

a. Every private property operator issuing notices of parking charges shall establish a written dispute resolution policy for contested parking charges that shall comply with this section. A copy of the current policy shall be filed with the Community Development Director. Every such policy shall contain the provision that allows the retailer, business or property owners who has issued the notice of parking charge, or authorized notices to be issued, to cancel the notice and parking charge at any time for any reason.
b. For a period of 21 calendar days from the issuance of a notice of parking charge or 14 calendar days from the mailing of a notice of delinquent parking charge, a person may request an initial review of the notice by the private parking operator. The request may be made by telephone, in writing, or in person. There shall be no charge for this review. If, following the initial review, the private parking operator is satisfied that the unauthorized parking did not occur, that the registered owner was not responsible for the charge, or that extenuating circumstances make dismissal of the charge appropriate in the interest of justice, the private parking operator shall cancel the notice of parking charge or notice of delinquent parking charge. The private parking operator shall mail the results of the initial review to the person contesting the notice.
c. If the person is dissatisfied with the results of the initial review, the person may request an administrative hearing of the charge no later than 21 calendar days following the mailing of the results of the private parking operator’s initial review. The request may be made by telephone, in writing, or in person. The person requesting an administrative hearing shall deposit the amount of the parking charge with the private parking operator. The private parking operator shall provide a written procedure to allow a person to request an administrative hearing without payment of the parking charge upon satisfactory proof of an inability to pay the amount due. Notice of this procedure shall be provided to all persons requesting an administrative hearing. An administrative hearing shall be held within 90 calendar days following the receipt of a request for an administrative hearing, excluding time tolled pursuant to this section. The person requesting the hearing may request one continuance, not to exceed 21 calendar days.
d. The administrative hearing process shall include the following:
(1) The person requesting a hearing shall have the choice of a hearing by mail or in person. An in-person hearing shall be conducted within the City of Walnut Creek.
(2) If the person requesting a hearing is a minor, that person shall be permitted to appear at a hearing or admit responsibility for the parking charge without the necessity of the appointment of a guardian. The private parking operator may proceed against the minor in the same manner as against an adult.
(3) The administrative hearing shall be conducted in accordance with written procedures established by the private parking operator and approved by the Community Development Director. The hearing shall provide an independent, objective, fair, and impartial review of contested parking charges.
(4) (A) The private parking operator shall contract with an independent third party that is not controlled by a private parking operator who shall provide qualified examiners to conduct the administrative hearings. Examiners shall demonstrate those qualifications, training, and objectivity necessary to conduct a fair and impartial review. An examiner shall not be employed, managed, or controlled by a person whose primary duties are as a private parking operator, parking charge processing, collection, or issuance. The examiner shall be separate and independent from the parking charge collection or processing function. An examiner’s continued employment, performance evaluation, compensation, and benefits shall not, directly or indirectly, be linked to the amount of parking charges collected by the examiner.
(B) Examiners shall have a minimum of 20 hours of training. The examiner is responsible for the costs of the training. The private parking operator may reimburse the examiner for those costs. Training may be provided through (i) an accredited college or university, (ii) a program conducted by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, (iii) American Arbitration Association or a similar established organization, or (iv) through any program approved by the Chief of Police, including a program developed and provided by, or for, the City. Training programs may include topics relevant to the administrative hearing, including, but not limited to, applicable laws and regulations, private parking operator procedures, due process, evaluation of evidence, hearing procedures, and effective oral and written communication. Upon the approval of the Chief of Police, up to 12 hours of relevant experience may be substituted for up to 12 hours of training. In addition, up to eight hours of the training requirements described in this subparagraph may be credited to an individual, at the discretion of the Chief of Police, based upon training programs or courses described in (i) to (iv), inclusive, that the individual attended within the last five years.
(5) The person who issues a notice of parking charge shall not be required to participate in an administrative hearing. The private parking operator shall not be required to produce any evidence other than the notice of parking charge or copy thereof and information received from the Department of Motor Vehicles identifying the registered owner of the vehicle. The documentation in proper form shall be prima facie evidence of the charge.
(6) The examiner’s decision following the administrative hearing may be personally delivered to the person by the examiner or sent by first-class mail.
(7) Following a determination by the examiner that a person owes the charge, the examiner may allow payment of the parking charge in installments, or a private parking operator may allow for deferred payment or allow for payments in installments, if the person provides evidence satisfactory to the examiner or the private parking operator, as the case may be, of an inability to pay the parking penalty in full. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02) and by (§, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03

6-10.09 Unauthorized Business Practices.

a. No private parking operator shall utilize the Denver boot or other similar device that is attached to the vehicle and which immobilizes the vehicle.
b. No person shall report or threaten to report an unpaid notice of a parking charge to a credit bureau or a collection agency unless a small claims court or other judicial proceeding has established the debt. No person shall take any action or threaten to take any action to collect, or contact with another person who takes or threatens to take any action to collect an unpaid notice of a parking charge other than to seek establishment of the debt in a small claims court or other judicial proceeding.
c. No private parking operator shall pay any employee or independent contractor a salary or fee that is in any way based on the number of notices of private parking charges they issue.
d. Every private parking operator who collects a mail in parking charge in violation of this chapter shall refund the fee to the owner of the vehicle (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02) and by (§1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)

6-10.10 Application to Core Area.

a. This chapter shall only apply within the Core Area of Walnut Creek as that portion of Walnut Creek is designated in the Planning Boundaries map shown in Chapter 1, Figure 2, of the Walnut Creek General Plan.
b. The City Council may by resolution designate other areas of the City of Walnut Creek where the provisions of this chapter shall be applicable. (§2, Ord. 1940, eff. 3/4/99; §1, Ord. 1971, eff. 10/19/00, §1, Ord. 2004, eff. 11/14/02 and by §1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)

6-10.11 Penalty.

Any person who violates any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor or an infraction.
a. If charged as an infraction, the penalty upon conviction of such person shall be a fine as set forth in §1-2.01 of this code.
b. If charged as a misdemeanor, the penalty upon conviction of such person shall be imprisonment in the county jail for a period not to exceed six months, or a fine not exceeding $1,000 of by both such fine and imprisonment. (§1, Ord. 2010, eff. 3/20/03)
The Walnut Creek Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2128, passed April 1, 2014.
Disclaimer: The City Clerk's Office has the official version of the Walnut Creek Municipal Code. Users should contact the City Clerk's Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above.
City Website: http://www.walnut-creek.org/
City Telephone: (925) 943-5800
Code Publishing Company 


Share:

Pressing EBMUD for answers

Pressing EBMUD for answers

The final straw was another Hit and Run in Lafayette CA where July 20th 2011 my car was totaled.  That event galvanized this blogger as Chief Christensen has refused to investigate.

The Explosion

My position in regards to my 2004 Truck Arson Fire is as follows
  • Law Enforcement Personnel Involved
  • Planned for insurance fraud Prudential Universal Life Policy $855,000
  • Mountain Cascade - Pipeline Contractor
  • Cal Fire Pipeline Safety Group - Lakewood CA
  • EBMUD - Protecting the public's money 
  • The Litigation Players - Unsavory Plaintiff
  • The State Bar - The first letters going
  • Other Parties 

The Deceased Witnesses

In early 2014, a former (but brief) friend named Alicia Driscoll and the alleged murder suicide of her daughter fell perfectly into my incident timeline.  There are several other cases near the CNET Scandal (Police), Family Law, Contra Costa Bar Association whose members litigated many major catastrophic accidents reaping those Super Lawyer Settlements but along the way even their Super Lawyer Powers missed deposing what most Plaintiff Attorneys conclude was the most important unrelated witness who'd collaborate the horrible fire deaths linked to other horrible deaths by fire.

Deceased Witnesses

ELLEN SABADUQUIA (1950-2005) Witness to the 2004 Walnut Creek Pipeline Explosion More

Explosive Profits by Disaster

Gas Pipeline Explosions 

Share:

Whistleblower Protection Act (the "Act"). First, under California Government Code section 8548.2

State agencies have two main ongoing responsibilities
How about protecting me?  
 

State agencies have two main ongoing responsibilities with regard to the Whistleblower Protection Act (the "Act"). First, under California Government Code section 8548.2, each state agency must print notices distributed by the California State Auditor containing information concerning the Act and post the notices in locations where other employee notices are maintained. Second, under Government Code section 8548.3 each state agency annually must send the information contained in the notice by electronic mail to all of its employees. Every year, the State Auditor issues an updated notification in the form of a poster, memorandum for distribution to agency employees, and notification to departments to facilitate compliance with these responsibilities. The poster (also available in letter size),memorandum to employees, and annual notification to the departments may be downloaded here.
In addition, under section 20080 of the State Administrative Manual, state entities must notify the State Auditor's Office and the Department of Finance of all cases of actual or suspected fraud, defalcation, theft, or other irregularities. The notification should be in writing and provided not later than the first business day following the discovery of any such incident.



Share:

Jomorson Properties, Inc. has a role in:

Walnut Creek Real Estate Fraud Network 
By Pete Bennett CNET  

When you search litigation on Benny Chetcuti Jr. you'll find numerous cases leading a wide net of suspect fraud cases.  The most important issues is how Chetcuti's litigation failed detection.

The guy driving the Suspect Vehicle 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser on July 1st 2012 was waiting on Sharlee Lane when the Dark Mercedes with #xxxxxx93 attempted to run me over, and that the FJ Cruiser known to park in front Walnut Creek City Hall and the Jomorson Properties that shares common corporate addresses with Regional Parking who towed my Ford Explorer away in December 2012.  

Companies Found at this Address
Location of Regional Parking Walnut Creek - the city approves their Certified Lots which are certified to screw you over as you might want to read the

1204-Alpine-Rd-Walnut-Creek-CA-94596

Jomorson Properties, Inc. has a role in:

MANAGING MEMBER 
MEMBER 
MEMBER 
MEMBER 
MEMBER 
MEMBER 
MEMBER 
Active
Share:

Police Officers Filing False Reports California Penal Code 118.1

Police Officers Filing False Reports
By Pete Bennett

By not filing or failing to investigate is essentially filing a false police report by omission which what has occurred with the following Agencies. 

  • Danville, 
  • CCSO, 
  • Lafayette Police, 
  • Pleasant Hill 
  • Walnut Creek Police PRE CHIEF TOM CHAPLIN
    • From 1970s ending with Chief Bryden
    • Under Chief Chaplin the officers now under surveillance and investigation. 


This pervasive pattern I have seen for decades from Pleasant Hill, Pittsburg, Concord, Walnut Creek and Danville.  This is a county where they are willing to frame students like Scott Dyleski deaths of many in the county. 

What's missing is just as important as what's there.  



The Murders of San Ramon Valley Unified School District Students 
Danville CA gas station at Sycamore and San Ramon Valley Road around 2000 they deliberately left out numerous first person witnesses who then were San Ramon Unified School District students.  They did take their pictures, addresses and that's it failed in gathering important witness statements in regards to five police officers who unload their weapons which killed the suspect.  Years later I asked e San Ramon Police officer about this incident and he referred to it as a "Good Kill" to which I replied "Officer, there is no such thing as a good kill" but blurted you should resign.  You should resign.  




Share:

Suspect Vehicle 2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser 2WD

Suspect Vehicle 
By Pete Bennett  
Walnut Creek CA--This is not an exact model years but color was close to Beige.

The suspect vehicle has been parked in the Walnut Creek City Offices parking lot and down the street where at 1330 N. Broadway Walnut Creek which leads to the table below.  

Check on this page for links to how Benny Chetcuti Jr. is connected via litigation to Jo



Connections to 

NameLocationDetails
Benny Chetcuti Walnut Creek, CAOwner at Chetcuti & Assoc
Benny Chetcuti Walnut Creek, CAPresident at Chetcuti and Associates, Inc.President at Jomorson Properties, Inc.
Benny Chetcuti Walnut Creek, CAPresident at Bates Chetcuti Monchek, Inc.Director at O'Hara Foundation
Benny Chetcuti Walnut Creek, CAPresident at Mosta Management Services, Inc.





Share:

Attempted Murder: Case # 14-19908 - Walnut Creek Police Officers

Attempted Murder - Bennett targeted again, JPA Bad Faith, Unfair Business Practices WTF?
By Pete Bennett  
Claim Against City Filed on June 26th
Same Vehicle tries again
Walnut Creek CA -- Upon ending a conversation with a suspected PI that occurred near closing time at the Walnut Creek Public Library at 8:00 PM, the now (sus/vic) approx. 55 years of age, 200 lbs, caucasian,narrow eyes, about 5'11" with goal of gleaning information from Bennett, a recent claimant against the City Of Walnut Creek is now once again he was targeted.  

While traveling home from the Walnut Creek Public Library heading the 100 block of Sierra Drive, the same black Mercedes began racing up on Bennett as he was attempting cross the street.  When the Walnut Creek PD arrived we had a distorted conversation about who, what and where.  Upon checking with WCPD front desk learned there is no police report for the September 2013 incident and it looks like they've deleted my police reports which is the inverse action of no investigation would be a violation of 


Embedded Map 





Share:

Claims Against City of Walnut Creek

Claims Against City of Walnut Creek
By Pete Bennett  
WALNUT CREEK CA -- For nearly ten years no one believed me about events that a large scale fraud operation was centered in Contra Costa County complete with all the resources and cover needed to run a covert operation.

In 2004 my truck explodes - A motorcycle officer arrives saying you we're burned alive, then months later the Gas Pipeline Explosion killed five but along the way there are four more deaths.  When discovering connections between my truck fire, then connecting my attorneys offices were connected to the same CNET offices, then connecting one of Chris Butlers clients to the 1170 Lincoln Ave Apartments but when my calls to CAL FIRE PIPELINE SAFETY GROUP who decided hanging up was better than answering questions about my findings.

I am eternally frustrated with my cars being totaled, accidents occurring near me, my friends, and my sons who were nearly killed in a high speed near direct "Swoop and Squat" and then eight years later my car is totaled in Lafayette CA by a retired cop and after three years with the FBI, SAG and CHP State Investigators, a very close call attempted murder by vehicle in Walnut Creek CA nothing.

My friend is beat to death in the Martinez Detention Facility which might be better suited to be Martinez Death Facility kill on arrival when appropriate.  The one good change was watching Walnut Creek PD arrest a off the charts belligerent patron of HubCaps Restaurant Walnut Creek.  The guy was an easy take down who apparently thought the bathroom was someone behind the kitchen are.  Either way they took the Sumo Wrestler down fast effectively but most important safely.  They used The Wrap and at the end of the day no one got hurt.

Perhaps we won't ever have another Banta or Bremer again which is two young men I personally knew.

The claims have been filed but I can't find an attorney because many attorneys know about The Dead Attorney Syndrome and the Contra Costa Bar Association should be investigated for ignoring issues I raised before many of these deaths occurred.  Our public officials at all levels should protecting businesses from extortion, arson, murders and tactical economic games targeting elderly residents (Benny Chetcuti Jr. and Walter Ng) who managed to ramp up millions collectively leading to Billions in Fraud.

That doesn't include the PG&E, Oakland Hills, and Kinder Morgan Fire. 

Share:

The Western Edge of the Mormon Universe

The Western Edge of the Mormon Universe
By Pete Bennett 
Danville CA-- Around June 2004 I was served with restraining orders, I'd just lost my Ford Explorer when this mysterious damage to 
Share:

The Arson History ~ Not Fire History

The Arson History Not Fire History
By Pete Bennett 


You be the Judge:

Try finding equivalent peer groups to match events found on my blogs.  Everything points to a network It's a network that has outmatched investigators because one core overarching aspect is these arsonists understand investigations and jurisdictions to the letter.  Each incident carefully plotted to exploit any chance of overlapping investigations.  


The Consistent Patterns 

Dead witnesses? Restaurants Burning? Lumber Yards, School Buses, Exploding Airline Passenger Planes, Two Gas Pipeline Explosions and the after Celebrations someone under the mountain.  
View details »

The Consistent Patterns 
Dead witnesses? Restaurants Burning? Lumber Yards, School Buses, Exploding Airline Passenger Planes, Two Gas Pipeline Explosions and the after Celebrations someone under the mountain.  


The Consistent Patterns 

Dead witnesses? Restaurants Burning? Lumber Yards, School Buses, Exploding Airline Passenger Planes, Two Gas Pipeline Explosions and the after Celebrations someone under the mountain.  
View details »
Share:

The Secret Arson Network - Explosions, Deaths and Destruction

The Secret Arson Network - by Pete Bennett

Burn Bennett Alive 

It took years of searching for suspects in my 2004 Truck Arson where I was nearly burned alive.  In 2013
View details »

Danville Police Officer is CHP Impersonator / Arson Witness

During a trip to Walnut Creek CA mid August 2004 my truck burst into flames just North of El Cerro Blvd on 680 but my original allegations that a CHP officer failed to recognize an a Murder Conspiracy using Arson was actually a Danville Motorcycle Officer who reappeared in 2012 Impersonating a CHP officer.

It was attempted Murder with help from the Danville Police and Contra Costa Sheriffs Office where they've covered up these lynchings

View details »

Eiko Sugihara

Donec id elit non mi porta gravida at eget metus. Fusce dapibus, tellus ac cursus commodo, tortor mauris condimentum nibh, ut fermentum massa justo sit amet risus. Etiam porta sem malesuada magna mollis euismod. Donec sed odio dui.
View details »
Share:

Dead Witnesses ~ Contra Costa Style - can't win kill em!

Share:

PRESS RELEASE: Former PG&E Programmer Attacked Again

PRESS RELEASE: Former PG&E Programmer Attacked Again




Dear PG&E, 




Share:

Press Release: Gas Pipeline Explosions Witnesses Being Killed

Kinder Morgan Fire DEAD Witnesses 
By Pete Bennett  
Walnut Creek CA:  On about July 20th, 2011, Pete Bennett while contracted to PG&E as a Software developer car was totaled in Lafayette CA where Lafayette Police a Contra Costa County Sheriff Office contract agency informed Mr. Bennett on multiple occasions that this was attempted murder.

Mr. Bennett upon being a previous arson victim from 2004 again without resolution began systematically breaking down catastrophic events costing insurers billions annually.

The responsible agencies in charge of protecting the public trust have engaged in a systematic pattern of arson coverup, witness intimidation, murders of witnesses and attempted murders of relations of witnesses has degraded to dissuade a Federal Agent by shooting out the tires on sig other tires.

With extensive research Mr. Bennett identified suspects, witnesses and interested parties plus responsible public agencies that a long pattern of unchecked arson cases have been deliberately derailed by investigators.

The dead witnesses are

Date Victim
01/04/2012
TB - Monthly 01/04/2012
2 TB - Monthly 02/04/2012 Declined
3 TB - Monthly 03/04/2012 Pending
4 TB - Monthly 04/04/2012 Call in to confirm

Share:

The City Attorneys Office Incident

The Walnut Creek City Attorneys Office 
By Pete Bennett CNET Scandal Date:  
Walnut Creek -- A 57 year old homeless man this attempted to get copies of police reports once again but was met with an armed resistance from officers once again seeking to prevent a resident from seeking documents.  Inside the City Attorney's offices there is a sanctuary of decorum, curiosity and rules but the guys with the cameras that look they're using the steroids they confiscating is whole different landscape.

It was like WTF, why are you here, you want documents? You have a problem?

On October 30th 2011 I was attacked in the Walnut Creek Farmers Market by Union Goon but officer John Rabonowitz told me there was no crime, then Lt. Gorski told me there was no Internal Affairs and Chief Bryden told there was no connection to my car being totaled after our July 6th conversation.  I guess he already knew that Lafayette Chief Uncle Eric Christiansen was actaully uncle Eric to my sons half brother.





Share:

Las Lomas and Murwood - Risk Assessment~Witnesses to Explosion

READ THIS If you saw the Kinder-Morgan Explosion
By Pete Bennett CNET 
Walnut Creek CA-- It took ten years to tie back why numerous Walnut Creek Police Officers Clandestine Disruption Operation have relentlessly targeted me.  




Share:

Walnut Creek Resident nearly killed on I-5 less 24 Hours after Bennett Speaks (Bennett Friend)

He's Connected To Federal Agent and FBI could care less 
By Pete Bennett 

Walnut Creek -- While traveling north on I-5 near Roseburg, Oregon on June 18th 2014, my good friend and music partner blows a tire, goes airborne 4-5 feet and crash lands on all fours.  The OSP were surprised he wasn't hurt or killed.

Is this another victim of the Walnut Creek Witness Killers where unidentified bodies are found near the Las Lomas Triangle where pipelines explodes and witnesses die?  

On June 16th in direct terms to the City Council about how two Walnut Creek Police Officers appeared to be setting me up to be killed near Nordstroms or perhaps my comments about going the SEC about the 2004 Kinder-Morgan Pipeline Explosion which via extensive research revealed that four additional deaths are connected to this fire.  Another viewpoint is these unreported deaths would tend impact investor decisions confidence as the facts about the explosion are in doubt.  

I am waiting for a copy of the police report that is so easy to get when you're media.  

If you're witness to the Kinder Morgan Explosion I'd suggest calling the SEC Whistleblower line as when you call the FBI you might get lucky.  Calling the Walnut Creek Police is nearly worthless at this time.  






Share:

Bennett Speaks ~ The Witness Killers Strike Again

The Witness Killers Strike Again 
By Pete Bennett CNET Scandal Date:  
Walnut Creek CA -- On June 17th 2014 once again taking the podium at great risk to the safety of my sons, friends and clients.  The next morning Bennett returns to Walnut Creek Police for yet another records request forced to go on his own because of the  DEAD ATTORNEY SYNDROME because the legal community sits on the crapper in fear and the State Bar doesn't see the problem.


Less
Share:

The Outside Nordstrom's Attempted Murder



The Murder Weapon was found here. ....

By Pete Bennett

This car followed me one night during the late evening hours the night of June 9, 2014.  I outsmarted the driver who passed me up and then came around.  Two police officers were waiting as I was about to cross.  

They are have been fired.  A few weeks later the same car was parked in front of the now former LIFT Lounge located on Locust Street Walnut Creek. 





Walnut Creek -- On Tuesday June 9th 2014 at 23:10 Hrs, a sus/vic vehicle began following (sus/vic) Bennett from Barnes and Noble Walnut Creek just after closing hours. Bennett a local homeless advocate is fully aware that homeless in Walnut Creek CA are being killed along with many other residents in the area.

The incident resulted in once again seeing the same core group of officers who've for the last ten years have harassed this citizen endlessly. It took several years of researching when I realized the same officers in this deadly Pipeline Explosion in 2004 where WCPD Bomb Squad Truck was on the scene is connected to officers that killed Anthony Banta Jr. of Paradise High School where my sons were are definitive witnesses to the 2005 Bennett Murder Attempt via high speed accident.

Walnut Creek is the city with the glowing reputation of being Rodeo Drive North has darker secrets where bodies being found 500 feet from Las Lomas High School and the larger Las Lomas Triangle – The Vortex Under Mt. Diablo a name needed to describe what's going on in Cold Case County where investigators bury cases using a The Dead Letter Box which is how spy masters handle their covert operatives. In 2013 a live person answered 925-313-2632 The Arson Murder Case so we don't know about the deceased is a mother who's likely another victim of the Dead Attorney Syndrome.

 

Share:

OBIT: The Judith and Adam Williams Murders or Murder Suicide



Murder-suicide mom wanted to keep boy from dad
Henry K. Lee, Chronicle Staff Writer
Published 4:00 am, Saturday, July 25, 2009
Reposted for all to ponder

From San Francisco Chronicle

The Walnut Creek woman who killed her teenage son on Mount Diablo before shooting herself was angry that the boy was spending more time with her ex-husband, her brother told The Chronicle after reading her suicide note.

Judith Elizabeth Williams, 51, decided to kill her 16-year-old son, Adam Williams, in part because her ex-husband had recently moved back to California from Missouri and was spending every other weekend with their son, her brother said. On Friday, father and son were to have left on a trip to Southern California.

"She didn't want Adam to go to his dad," Williams' brother, Bill Collins, 55, of Palo Cedro (Shasta County) said Friday. "That was obvious."

On the afternoon of July 17, Williams and Adam drove up to Lookout Point near the top of Mount Diablo. They got out of her Toyota Corolla and enjoyed the view. Williams took a picture of her son and then ambushed him with two shots to his chest and head before killing herself, authorities said.

"I loved my sister," Collins said. "I have to have sympathy for her plight, but I have no sympathy for her taking Adam. Since she shot that beautiful boy, that sympathy goes out the window."

Collins said his sister had made clear in a three-page, typed suicide note found beside her computer that she wanted her and her son's lives to end.

She described taking her cats to a shelter the day before and of taking Zachary, the family dog, to the veterinarian to have it euthanized at 11:45 a.m., only hours before the drive up to Mount Diablo, Collins said.

'Extremely calculating'

She expressed anguish that Adam, the boy she had raised alone since she filed for divorce from Jim Williams in 1996, was spending more time with her ex-husband, Collins said.

"It seemed extremely calculating and deliberate in its purpose," Collins said of his sister's reasoning.

He said his sister had also touched on financial problems she had been having for at least a decade. She wrote something to the effect of, "This was (the) only option because bills are due," Collins said.

Judith Williams filed for bankruptcy protection once, in 1999, and her landlord told The Chronicle that she was behind on the $1,700 monthly rent for her house on Blackwood Drive.

After their five-year marriage dissolved, Jim Williams moved to St. Louis and saw his son only during the holidays. Her former husband, now 45, moved to Roseville (Placer County) a couple of years ago and started seeing Adam every other weekend and a couple of weeks each summer.

"I thought it was the right thing to do," Collins said.

But Judith Williams was "livid," her brother said. She felt that she had done all the work of raising Adam.

"She had a chip on her shoulder that I never really understood," Collins said. "It was kind of strange."

Tension in family

Collins said his sister could be difficult and was "tough as nails" in her dealings with others. She had a falling-out with their younger brother and had only recently made up with her older sister after a dispute, Collins said. "There was a difficult family dynamic," he said.

Despite their problems, he said, the siblings had reached out to Williams, offering her money and support. Collins said he had encouraged his sister and Adam to come live with him in Shasta County.

Why Williams took the path she did will forever haunt her family, Collins said. 'I'm bewildered'

"I wouldn't say I'm angry. I would say I'm ashamed," he said. "I'm bewildered. I'm perplexed. I'm sad she would do something like that" to a son she treated "like solid gold." Dax Harris, head track coach at Las Lomas High School in Walnut Creek, where Adam would have been a junior in the fall, said the boy had been "improving every day" on the field.

"It's a really tragic circumstance. I think it's kind of a selfish act," Harris said Friday as he prepared to attend a memorial for Adam in Fair Oaks (Sacramento County).

"I really don't see the point in something like this," Harris said. "I figure you can set differences aside when it comes to divorce and doing stuff with the kids."

Share:

Your Public Officials Are Failing You

When the CNET Scandal broke in 2011 it was clear all the calls I’d made the FBI were paying off.  In 2004 I went through a long list of attacks, arson, fires and accidents. 

In 2005 while my sons were students at San Ramon Valley Unified Schools covering Danville, San Ramon and south Walnut Creek my sons and I were on 680 heading WB 580 when a driver tried to flip us.


That incident claimed the life of the other driver who hit the median at 70 to perhaps 90 MPH.  Back then my sons were lucky but after ten years of many deliberate incidents it’s clear I was targeted and that the sum of my incident to several Gas Pipeline Explosions which leads a Danville Police Motorcycle Officer who was in Walnut Creek CA around Sept 2012 wearing those CHP truck inspection Overalls over his Navy Blues – with TAU, a mistake that State Senator Mark DeSaulnier made in August 2011, as relatives of two state senators have been murdered. I told the unit three years ago that persons near CNET have been regularly since the 80’s and the Dead Seeno Witness List page explain what’s truly happening. 

http://www.chp.ca.gov/depts_divs_offs/psd_dps.html

I began once again calling Contra Costa Officials for help over ten years ago.  In 2004 a pipeline exploded in your county, straddled between two schools with thousands of students.  In 2004, Mormons from Alamo CA and Danville Police tried to kill me via the “Bennett Truck Arson Fire” on NB 680 where but that deliberately concealed fire preceded a deadly explosion in Walnut Creek where a pipeline explosion in close enough proximity to level two schools with thousands of students.

These Gas Pipeline Fires devastated lives on two sides of the San Francisco Bay but the Kinder Morgan Fire has far too many links to my events.  The Driscoll Murders are connected to Mountain Cascade Construction, CAL Fire, Kinder Morgan (KMP) where the billionaire settles out financially but reading up on Richard Morgan sketchy sounding operations but a research piece by
Share:

The Dead Danville Building Inspector –Gary Vinson Collins 12/19/2011

 

 

The Danville Building Inspector attacked me at my Danville Residence in Sept 2004 a month after the Bennett Arson Fire

Share:

CNET Officers, The Dead CNET Witnesses, Attorneys and Students

 

Author: Pete Bennett | Phone 510-460-5641

Walnut Creek CA : This story like started decades ago with an arson/murder, a murder and an arson on a farm.  One of strongest likely starting points of decades tactical murder for hire operation that extends into Contra Costa County Law Enforcement at many levels. 

 

 

Share:

► Adventist Health Risk Management Contact Info

 

 

More forms  Burdensome?  Read the blog folks – my sons are at risk. 

 

From: Higgins,Jean [mailto:Jean.Higgins@ah.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 12:22 PM
To: 'pete@petebennett.net'

 

 


Subject: FW: Adventist Health Risk Management Contact Info

Mr. Bennett,

Ms. Snyder forwarded your e-mail to the Risk Management Department as she was unable to address your request. Subsequently, I consulted legal counsel and was advised that you need to present, in person, written authorization to obtain copies of your children’s medical records.  I do realize that this is burdensome for you but Feather River Hospital’s obligations to protect patient privacy makes this step necessary. 

 

I know I’m the father and I get to go to jail for child support and everyone in the fucking universe knows I’m the father

I have legal court papers, and it doesn’t matter that Attorney Victor Golub helped hide my kids from me. 

In the past you have contacted multiple individuals in our organization with this request, but going forward the Risk Management Department will be the single point of contact.  Should you inadvertently contact another department, you will be redirected.

As to your request for a claims person, if you are interested in pursuing a claim, you will need to contact your attorney.

Jean Higgins

Quality/Risk Manager

From: Snyder,Tamera
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 2:22 PM
To: Higgins,Jean
Subject: FW: Adventist Health Risk Management Contact Info

From: hotmail_6cd656d49f755d86@live.com [mailto:hotmail_6cd656d49f755d86@live.com] On Behalf Of Pete Bennett
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 4:31 PM
To: Snyder,Tamera
Subject: RE: Adventist Health Risk Management Contact Info

Dear Ms. Synder, 

I have called more than once.  Do your job and find me a claims person before I file a lawsuit as my sons are at risk and I shouldn't have to go through this much effort to gain access to my sons records - i have joint legal custody. 

No more push back from all points as I will be very clear that my ex wife is nuts and dangerous to our sons.  

Pete Bennett 

510-460-5641


From: Tamera.Snyder@ah.org
To: pete@petebennett.net
Subject: RE: Adventist Health Risk Management Contact Info
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:00:54 +0000

Unfortunately, until you make contact and are assigned a specific individual, there is no email address.

From: hotmail_6cd656d49f755d86@live.com [mailto:hotmail_6cd656d49f755d86@live.com] On Behalf Of Pete Bennett
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 2:04 PM
To: Snyder,Tamera
Subject: RE: Adventist Health Risk Management Contact Info

I want the email for the risk manager in Roseville - I am not going to fix your mistake at my expense - I don't have a place to receive mail.  it's that bad 


From: Tamera.Snyder@ah.org
To: pete@petebennett.net
Subject: Adventist Health Risk Management Contact Info
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:49:46 +0000

Adventist Health

ATTN:  Risk Management

2100 Douglas Blvd.

Roseville, CA 95661

916-781-2000

It is very important that you include YOUR contact information (the BEST way for them to reach you) in your correspondence.

Tamie

Share:

Anchor links for post titles

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Labels

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Labels

Recent Posts

Pages

Labels

Blog Archive

Recent Posts