FILE - In this file photo dated Thursday, July 5, 2018, an unidentified British police officer guards a cordon in Salisbury, England. Officials say Saturday July 7, 2018, that a police officer is being tested for possible medical problems related to the recent Novichok nerve agent poisoning of two individuals in southwest England. (AP Photo/Matt Dunham, FILE)
FILE - In this file photo dated Thursday, July 5, 2018, an unidentified British police officer guards a cordon in Salisbury, England. Officials say Saturday July 7, 2018, that a police officer is being tested for possible medical problems related to the recent Novichok nerve agent poisoning of two individuals in southwest England. (AP Photo/Matt Dunham, FILE)
LONDON (AP) — A woman who was poisoned by a military-grade nerve agent in southwest England died Sunday, eight days after police think she touched a contaminated item that has not been found.
London's Metropolitan Police force said the case had become a homicide investigation now that 44-year-old Dawn Sturgess had died in a hospital in Salisbury. She and her boyfriend, Charlie Rowley, 45, were admitted June 30 and remained in critical condition.
Police said tests showed the pair was exposed to Novichok, the same type of nerve agent used to poison former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter, Yulia, in Salisbury in March. Police suspect Rowley and Sturgess handled an item from the first attack, which Britain blames on Russia.
Moscow denies involvement.
Prime Minister Theresa May said she was "appalled and shocked" by Sturgess's death.
"Police and security officials are working urgently to establish the facts of this incident, which is now being treated as murder," May said.
Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu, Britain's top anti-terrorism police officer, said the death "has only served to strengthen our resolve" to find those responsible.
More than 100 police officers have been working to locate a small vial or other container thought to have held the nerve agent that sickened the two. Officials say the search and cleanup operation will take weeks or even month.
Counterterrorism police are also studying roughly 1,300 hours of closed circuit television footage in hopes of finding clues about the couple's activities in the hours before they became violently ill.
Detectives want to know where the couple was to get new leads on where the contamination might have occurred.
Britain maintains the March attack on the Skripals had been ordered by the Russian government, a charge denied by representatives of Russian President Vladimir Putin. The case led to the expulsion of Russian diplomats from Britain, the United States, and other countries, and tit-for-tat retaliation by Moscow.
The new poisoning has frightened some residents who thought an extensive cleanup had removed the threat of any further Novichok exposure.
Hospital officials said late Saturday that a number of people including a police officer had sought medical advice in the last week but had been found not to need any treatment.
John Glen, the Conservative Party legislator for the region, said the new poisoning has threatened an economic rebound from the slowdown caused by the attack on the Skripals.
"We need to establish quickly what they came into contact with and where," he said. "The sentiment in the city is frustration, we want to get back to normal."
Britain's interior minister visited Salisbury and nearby Amesbury, where the couple fell ill, on Sunday to reassure residents that the risk to the public remains low.
Home Secretary Sajid Javid said the area is open for business and urged people to visit what he called one of the most beautiful parts of the country.
Passed the House on March 14, 1996 (without objection)
Reported by the joint conference committee on April 15, 1996; agreed to by the Senate on April 17, 1996 (91-8) and by the House on April 18, 1996 (293–133)
Signed into law by PresidentBill Clintonon April 24, 1996
The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, (also known as AEDPA) is an act of the United States Congress signed into law on April 24, 1996. The bill was introduced by former Senate Majority LeaderBob Dole, passed with broad bipartisan support by Congress (91-8 in the United States Senate, 293-133 in the House of Representatives) following the 1990s World Trade Center and Oklahoma City bombings, and signed into law by President Bill Clinton.[1][2]
Although controversial for its changes to the law of habeas corpus in the United States (Title I), upheld in Felker v. Turpin, 518U.S.651
(1997), the AEDPA also contained a number of provisions to "deter
terrorism, provide justice for victims, provide for an effective death
penalty, and for other purposes" in the words of the bill summary.
Provisions include
providing restitution/assistance for victims of terrorism (Title II),
designation of foreign terrorist organizations and prohibitions on funding (Title III),
removal or exclusion of alien terrorists and modifications of asylum procedures (Title IV),
restrictions on nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons (Title V),
implementation of the plastic explosives convention (Title VI),
changes to criminal law involving terrorist (or explosives)
offenses, including increased penalties and criminal procedures changes
(Title VII),
commissioning a study to determine the constitutionality of restrictions on bomb-making materials (Title VII - A - Sec. 709),
funding changes and jurisdiction clarifications for law enforcement related to terrorism threats (Title VIII),
The AEDPA had a tremendous impact on the law of habeas corpus in the United States. One provision of the AEDPA limits the power of federal judges to grant relief[3] unless the state court's adjudication of the claim resulted in a decision that was
contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or
based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceeding.
In addition to the modifications that pertain to all habeas cases,
AEDPA enacted special review provisions for capital cases from states
that enacted quality controls for the performance of counsel in the
state courts in the post-conviction phase. States that enacted these
quality controls would see strict time limitations enforced against
their death-row inmates in federal habeas proceedings coupled with
extremely deferential review to the determinations of their courts
regarding issues of federal law. Only Arizona has qualified for these
additional provisions, but it has not been able to take advantage of
them because it has not followed its own procedures.
Other provisions of the AEDPA created entirely new statutory law. For
example, the judicially created abuse-of-the-writ doctrine had
restricted the presentation of new claims through subsequent habeas
petitions. The AEDPA replaced this doctrine with an absolute bar on
second or successive petitions. Petitioners who attempted to bring
claims in federal habeas proceedings that have already been decided in a
previous habeas petition would find those claims barred. Additionally,
petitioners who had already filed a federal habeas petition were
required to first secure authorization from the appropriate federal
court of appeals. Furthermore, the AEDPA took away from the Supreme
Court the power to review a court of appeals's denial of that
permission, thus placing final authority for the filing of second
petitions in the hands of the federal courts of appeals.
History
The bill was introduced by Senate Majority LeaderBob Dole, passed with broad bipartisan support by Congress (91-8 in the United States Senate, 293-133 in the House of Representatives) following the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, and signed into law by President Bill Clinton on April 24, 1996.[1][2]
Soon after it was enacted, AEDPA endured a critical test in the
Supreme Court. The basis of the challenge was that the provisions
limiting the ability of persons to file successive habeas petitions
violated Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 of the US Constitution, the Suspension Clause. The Supreme Court held unanimously in Felker v. Turpin, 518U.S.651 (1997), that these limitations did not unconstitutionally suspend the writ.
In 2005, the United States Ninth Circuit indicated that it was willing to consider a challenge to the constitutionality of AEDPA on separation of powers grounds under City of Boerne v. Flores and Marbury v. Madison,[4] but has since decided that the issue had been settled by circuit precedent.[5]
Basketball player and later coach Steve Kerr
and his siblings and mother sued the Iranian government under the
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, for the 1984
killing of Steve Kerr's father, Malcolm H. Kerr, in Beirut, Lebanon.[6]
Reception
While
the act has several titles and provisions, the majority of criticism
stems from the act's tightening of habeas corpus laws. Those in favor of
the bill say that the act prevents those convicted of crimes from
"thwart[ing] justice and avoid[ing] just punishment by filing frivolous
appeals for years on end,"[7] while critics argue that the inability to make multiple appeals increases the risk of an innocent person being killed.[3][8]
Other, more recent criticism centers on the deference that the law
requires of federal judges in considering habeas petitions. In Sessoms
v. Grounds (Ninth Circuit), a majority of the judges believed that the
state erred in not throwing out testimony made in the absence of the
defendant's attorney after he had requested counsel, but were forced to
overturn his appeal. The dissenting opinion said that federal courts can
only grant habeas relief where "there is no possibility fairminded
jurists could disagree that the state court's decision conflicts with
[the Supreme] Court's precedents."[9]
Rankin, Bill; Judd, Alan (2003-09-21). "Witnesses Recant; Law Stymies Death Row Appeal". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty. Retrieved 2011-04-25.
Osama bin Laden family members invested $10M in an equity
fund run by former Bechtel unit. May 5, 2003: 2:17 PM EDT
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - The Bush administration launched a war on terror because
of the alleged acts of Osama bin Laden. Ironically, one of the companies the administration
has picked to rebuild Iraq after the latest phase of that war has ties to bin Laden's
family, according to a published report.
Bechtel Corp., a private construction firm based in San Francisco, recently was
awarded a State Department contract, potentially worth more than $600 million, to
help rebuild Iraq's infrastructure after the recent U.S.-led war there.
The Bush administration pushed for that war, in part, because it said the regime
of Saddam Hussein, former leader of Iraq, had ties to the al Qaeda terror network,
headed by bin Laden, the group allegedly responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist
attacks in the United States.
According to an article in the May 5 issue of New Yorker magazine, several
bin Laden family members -- part of a large, Saudi Arabian family that made a fortune
in the construction business -- invested about $10 million in a private equity fund
operated by former subsidiary of Bechtel before Sept. 11.
Fremont Group, a San Francisco-based private investment firm, once was a unit of
Bechtel, and its board still includes Bechtel CEO Riley P. Bechtel and former U.S.
Secretary of State and former Bechtel President George P. Shultz, along with several
current Bechtel directors.
Bechtel could not be reached for comment.
Fremont spokeswoman Pat Harden confirmed bin Laden's family had invested $10 million
in a Fremont fund, but she said the family had no ownership stake in Fremont and
its investment was made "well before the events of Sept. 11."
"Our concern is that it be clear they're investors, like many, in one of our many
private equity funds," Harden said, noting that the Patriot Act of 2001 requires
such investors to be screened for connections to terrorism. "This is all totally
legal and above-board."
Harden didn't know exactly when bin Laden's family invested in the equity fund.
Fremont general counsel Rick Kopf told the New Yorker bin Laden's family
had invested nothing in Fremont since Sept. 11.
None of bin Laden's family members has been charged with any crimes, and the family
denounced Osama bin Laden in the mid-1990s. Some family members also have publicly
denounced the Sept. 11 attacks.
Saying they feared for their safety, about two dozen family members living in the
United States left the country as soon as airports re-opened after Sept. 11.
Nobody was home at Harry Bowman's apartment in Upland on Thursday evening.
A
package was tucked neatly under the welcome mat on the concrete
landing. It had been sent "priority express" by his mother from York,
Pa. The postage was $44.95.
It was addressed to "Hal."
Bowman's
name had been released by authorities earlier in the day, along with
the 13 other victims of the mass shooting Wednesday in San Bernardino.
He was 46.
Bowman was one of the earliest contributors to CREATE, a
USC center that studies national security and terrorism, the director
said in an email. Bowman, who left the center for a job with the San
Bernardino Unified School District, was an expert in spacial data and
mapping.
Neighbors said they didn't really know much about him, or anybody else at the Stoneridge Apartment Homes for that matter.
"There's
not a lot of socializing," said Gina Lugo, 54, who lives in the
one-bedroom next door with her mother. "People just go to work and come
home."
She said they had talked only once, when he advised her to call the management about a problem with the hot water.
Across the hall, Dr. Guillermo Saenz, a 29-year-old medical resident, said he knew Bowman had at least one daughter.
"He would come out to the pool and teach her how to swim," he said.
Reached
by phone in York, Bowman's mother, Marion, said that her son had grown
up there and moved to California for work more than 15 years ago.
He had two daughters, she said, adding that the family wanted to protect their privacy.
The package, she said, contained Christmas presents.
OBAMA: Good evening. On Wednesday, 14 Americans were
killed as they came together to celebrate the holidays. They were taken
from family and friends who loved them deeply. They were white and
black, Latino and Asian, immigrants, and American born, moms and dads,
daughters and sons. Each of them served their fellow citizens. All of
them were part of our American family.
Tonight I want to talk with you about this tragedy, the broader
threat of terrorism and how we can keep our country safe. The FBI is
still gathering the facts about what happened in San Bernardino, but
here’s what we know. The victims were brutally murdered and injured by
one of their co-workers and his wife. So far, we have no evidence that
the killers were directed by a terrorist organization overseas or that
they were part of a broader conspiracy here at home. But it is clear
that the two of them had gone down the dark path of radicalization,
embracing a perverted interpretation of Islam that calls for war against
America and the West. They had stockpiled assault weapons, ammunition,
and pipe bombs.
So this was an act of terrorism designed to kill innocent people. Our
nation has been at war with terrorists since Al Qaeda killed nearly
3,000 Americans on 9/11. In the process, we’ve hardened our defenses,
from airports, to financial centers, to other critical infrastructure.
Intelligence and law enforcement agencies have disrupted countless plots
here and overseas and worked around the clock to keep us safe.
Our military and counterterrorism professionals have relentlessly
pursued terrorist networks overseas, disrupting safe havens in several
different countries, killing Osama Bin Laden, and decimating Al Qaeda’s
leadership.
Over the last few years, however, the terrorist threat has evolved
into a new phase. As we’ve become better at preventing complex
multifaceted attacks like 9/11, terrorists turn to less complicated acts
of violence like the mass shootings that are all too common in our
society. It is this type of attack that we saw at Fort Hood in 2009, in
Chattanooga earlier this year, and now in San Bernardino.
And as groups like ISIL grew stronger amidst the chaos of war in Iraq
and then Syria, and as the Internet erases the distance between
countries, we see growing efforts by terrorists to poison the minds of
people like the Boston Marathon bombers and the San Bernardino killers.
For seven years, I’ve confronted this evolving threat each and every
morning in my intelligence briefing, and since the day I took this
office, I have authorized U.S. forces to take out terrorists abroad
precisely because I know how real the danger is.
As commander in chief, I have no greater responsibility than the security of the American people.
As a father to two young daughters who are the most precious part of
my life, I know that we see ourselves with friends and co-workers at a
holiday party like the one in San Bernardino. I know we see our kids in
the faces of the young people killed in Paris.
And I know that after so much war, many Americans are asking whether we are confronted by a cancer that has no immediate cure.
Well, here’s what I want you to know. The threat from terrorism is
real, but we will overcome it. We will destroy ISIL and any other
organization that tries to harm us. Our success won’t depend on tough
talk, or abandoning our values or giving into fear. That’s what groups
like ISIL are hoping for. Instead, we will prevail by being strong and
smart, resilient and relentless. And by drawing upon every aspect of
American power.
Here’s how. First, our military will continue to hunt down terrorist
plotters in any country where it is necessary. In Iraq and Syria, air
strikes are taking out ISIL leaders, heavy weapons, oil tankers,
infrastructure.
And since attacks in Paris, our closest allies, including France,
Germany, and the United Kingdom, have ramped up their contributions to
our military campaign which will help us accelerate our effort to
destroy ISIL.
Second, we will continue to provide training and equipment to tens of
thousands of Iraqi and Syrian forces fighting ISIL on the ground so
that we take away their safe havens.
In both countries, we’re deploying special operations forces who can
accelerate that offensive. We’ve stepped up this effort since the
attacks in Paris, and will continue to invest more in approaches that
are working on the ground.
Third, we’re working with friends and allies to stop ISIL’s
operations, to disrupt plots, cut off their financing, and prevent them
from recruiting more fighters.
Since the attacks in Paris, we’ve surged merged intelligence sharing
with our European allies. We’re working with Turkey to seal its border
with Syria, and we are cooperating with Muslim majority countries, and
with our Muslim communities here at home, to counter the vicious
ideology that ISIL promotes online.
Fourth, with American leadership, the international community has
begun to establish a process and timeline to pursue cease-fires and a
political resolution to the Syrian war.
Doing so will allow the Syrian people and every country, including
our allies, but also countries like Russia, to focus on the common goal
of destroying ISIL, a group that threatens us all.
This is our strategy to destroy ISIL. It is designed and supported by
our military commanders and counterterrorism experts, together with 65
countries that have joined an American-led coalition. And we constantly
examine our strategy to determine when additional steps are needed to
get the job done.
That’s why I’ve ordered the Departments of State and Homeland
Security to review the visa waiver program under which the female
terrorist in San Bernardino originally came to this country. And that’s
why I will urge high-tech and law enforcement leaders to make it harder
for terrorists to use technology to escape from justice.
Now, here at home, we have to work together to address the challenge.
There are several steps that Congress should take right away. To begin
with, Congress should act to make sure no one on a no- fly list is able
to buy a gun. What could possibly be the argument for allowing a
terrorist suspect to buy a semiautomatic weapon? This is a matter of
national security.
We also need to make it harder for people to buy powerful assault
weapons, like the ones that were used in San Bernardino. I know there
are some who reject any gun-safety measures, but the fact is that our
intelligence and law-enforcement agencies, no matter how effective they
are, cannot identify every would-be mass shooter, whether that
individual was motivated by ISIL or some other hateful ideology.
What we can do, and must do, is make it harder for them to kill.
Next, we should put in place stronger screening for those who come to
America without a visa so that we can take a hard look at whether
they’ve traveled to war zones. And we’re working with members of both
parties in Congress to do exactly that.
Finally, if Congress believes, as I do, that we are at war with ISIL,
it should go ahead and vote to authorize the continued use of military
force against these terrorists.
For over a year, I have ordered our military to take thousands of air
strikes against ISIL targets. I think it’s time for Congress to vote to
demonstrate that the American people are united and committed to this
fight.
My fellow Americans, these are the steps that we can take together to defeat the terrorist threat.
Let me now say a word about what we should not do. We should not be
drawn once more into a long and costly ground war in Iraq or Syria.
That’s what groups like ISIL want. They know they can’t defeat us on the
battlefield. ISIL fighters were part of the insurgency that we faced in
Iraq. But they also know that if we occupy foreign lands, they can
maintain insurgencies for years, killing thousands of our troops and
draining our resources, and using our presence to draw new recruits.
The strategy that we are using now — air strikes, special forces, and
working with local forces who are fighting to regain control of their
own country — that is how we’ll achieve a more sustainable victory, and
it won’t require us sending a new generation of Americans overseas to
fight and die for another decade on foreign soil.
Here’s what else we cannot do. We cannot turn against one another by
letting this fight be defined as a war between America and Islam. That,
too, is what groups like ISIL want.
ISIL does not speak for Islam. They are thugs and killers, part of a
cult of death. And they account for a tiny fraction of a more than a
billion Muslims around the world, including millions of patriotic
Muslim-Americans who reject their hateful ideology.
Moreover, the vast majority of terrorist victims around the world are Muslim.
If we’re to succeed in defeating terrorism, we must enlist Muslim
communities as some of our strongest allies, rather than push them away
through suspicion and hate.
That does not mean denying the fact that an extremist ideology has
spread within some Muslim communities. It’s a real problem that Muslims
must confront without excuse.
Muslim leaders here and around the globe have to continue working
with us to decisively and unequivocally reject the hateful ideology that
groups like ISIL and Al Qaeda promote, to speak out against not just
acts of violence, but also those interpretations of Islam that are
incompatible with the values of religious tolerance, mutual respect, and
human dignity.
But just as it is the responsibility of Muslims around the world to
root out misguided ideas that lead to radicalization, it is the
responsibility of all Americans, of every faith, to reject
discrimination. It is our responsibility to reject religious tests on
who we admit into this country. It’s our responsibility to reject
proposals that Muslim-Americans should somehow be treated differently.
Because when we travel down that road, we lose. That kind of
divisiveness, that betrayal of our values plays into the hands of groups
like ISIL.
Muslim-Americans are our friends and our neighbors, our co- workers,
our sports heroes. And, yes, they are our men and women in uniform who
are willing to die in defense of our country. We have to remember that.
My fellow Americans, I am confident we will succeed in this mission
because we are on the right side of history. We were founded upon a
belief in human dignity that no matter who you are, or where you come
from, or what you look like or what religion you practice, you are equal
in the eyes of God and equal in the eyes of the law. Even in this
political season, even as we properly debate what steps I and future
presidents must take to keep our country safe. Let’s make sure we never
forget what makes us exceptional. Let’s not forget that freedom is more
powerful than fear. That we have always met challenges, whether war or
depression, natural disasters or terrorist attacks, by coming together
around our common ideals as one nation and one people.
So long as we stay true to that tradition, I have no doubt that America will prevail.
Thank you. God bless you. And may God bless the United States of America.
Sepember 23rd, 2014
Pete Bennett addresses the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. The room was filled with county leaders safety, fire and hospital leadership.
My comments:
PG&E Explosions are Domestic Terrorism
Domestic Terrorism
Poison
Bacteria
Decades of unfullflled police reports
On September 29th,
2014
A national news story ran about a family of five found dead. The Strack's were my nephews and yes the obsfucated police report are part of the story.
Suicide
On Februry 23rd, 2012, I learned the Todd Cambra, a homeless person in Walnut Creek CA was in John Muir Hospital after being run over on S. California Blvd., began searching for Keith Richards (Alias) after learning he was out of the hospital.
Homeless Homicides
My first real contact with Mormons wasn't good as I arrived home with the Kings of Cultism in my house.
The way the Mormons operate is like a chess board, they Sacrafice Pawns, then roooks then it goes on to Bishop on f1 to g2, g2 pawn to g3?
Mormon Temples
Stakes
Wards
Dead Bishops, Dead Members and you'll see #MormonMurders
April 12, 2012: a pipe-bomb found on Iron Horse Trail - e.g. the Southern Pacific Tracks. April 18, 2012: Nate Greenan killed in car accident on WB-24 in Orinda CA
Mr. Christensen obtained a Bachelor's Degree in Financial Planning from Brigham Young University in 1980 and an MBA from the Yale School of Management in 1985. He has served as trustee of multiple trusts since 1997. Currently, Mr. Christensen serves on the National Advisory Council for the Marriott School of Management, the International Advisory Council of the International Center for Law & Religion at the J. Reuben Clark School of Law, and the President's Leadership Council at Brigham Young University. He also serves on the Policy Advisory Board of the Fisher Center for Real Estate & Urban Economics at University of California, Berkeley.
Dave Christensen is a Co-founder and Managing Principal of Milestone. Prior to Milestone, Mr. Christensen served as Co-President of Nearon Enterprises for over 20 years, from 1993 until June 2014. From 1985 until 1992, he was with Bechtel Investments Realty in San Francisco. Background:
On July 4th, 2011, I bumped into David Christian and Danville Mayor Newell Arnerich who each deflected my inquiries, Arnerich was keenly aware of unfolding CNET or Dirty DUI Scandal where Danville Officer Stephen Tanabe had been recently arrested.
I first met Dave at the Alamo 1st Ward where my ex-wife was baptized into the Mormon Faith in 1975. That connection binds her to Rick Kopf, James Greenan and Chris Ivory. That also binds them to who knows who rigged my truck to explode in 2004.
Throughout my blogs I've documented law enforcement failures but when Lafayette Police refused to investigate my July 2011 accident I knew someone was pulling the strings.
The Explosion Facts
Five Dead Welders
One Key Witness
One Mother, One Daughter
The Case Summary
What reeks about this explosion is the loose ends, the explosion details, the dead witnesses, the possible deaths of students who were on the field and the undeniable connection to the Contra Costa Bar Association that exerts lock step control over Bar Members.
On my blogs about explosions you were learn my well founded up close and connected to numerous explosions and arson incidents supports my position that the A Serial Domestic Terrorism Group is run from the East Bay and greater Bay Area.
Kinder Morgan 2004
After several years of researching incidents connected to my personal story it was getting extremely clear that there were other victims. Around 2008 after losing software gigs valued in the tens of thousands in revenues it was getting clear I was being targeted. Turning to Law Enforcement was futile with nothing but dead ends.
Cal Fire Pipeline Safety Group
EBMUD – when they informed of my allegations
Walnut Creek Police Investigators
The Attorneys
Suspected Payoff
The Kinder Morgan investigation and litigation moved quickly through the District Attorney’s Offices where investigators, police officers and a plaintiff attorney, now a public official the huge mistake by making contact. I have detailed
The Cover-up Exposed itself
The ongoing harassment by many Walnut Creek officers didn’t work on me but instead forced to fight harder, the tickets, fines and thefts of my servers, laptops coupled with the loss of five offices over a ten year period kept pointing back to police.
The Conclusion –
In desperation I called the SEC Whistleblower unit on Kinder Morgan as someone was trying to kill one of their agents.
That person is an unknown witness to the explosion and a few days after that I got a call – someone shot the tires of the agents cars. They were brilliant they used DU Round.
SAN JOSE, Calif.— On April 13, 2012 the silence of the night was shattered with the thunder of AK-47's pumping over 100 rounds into a PG&E Sub-Station - one of many tests on the Domestic Power-Grid but unnoticed in that attack leads to my personal argument that the our systems are fragile, that we'll let anymore who uses a keyboard near critical information system.
In March 2011 PG&E hired American Programmer who was charged on Feb 2nd 2011 with PC-270 - a bench warrant was issued and 30 days later Bennett gets a job connected to worst pipeline disasters on record?
Do I suspect that this project was a setup and events in September 2010 concocted by a retired San Francisco Cop (Lt.) was part of a larger domestic terrorism plan - yes I do as getting hired in March 2011 goal was my laptop data but in 2011 it was just a contract but today I'm suspecting that persons near the deadly 2004 Pipeline Fire should reviewed as a Murder case