Washington D.C., Dec. 17, 2021 —
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges against
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS), a broker-dealer subsidiary of
JPMorgan Chase & Co., for widespread and longstanding failures by
the firm and its employees to maintain and preserve written
communications. JPMS admitted the facts set forth in the SEC’s order and
acknowledged that its conduct violated the federal securities laws, and
agreed to pay a $125 million penalty and implement robust improvements
to its compliance policies and procedures to settle the matter.
“Since the 1930s, recordkeeping and books-and-records obligations have
been an essential part of market integrity and a foundational component
of the SEC’s ability to be an effective cop on the beat. As technology
changes, it’s even more important that registrants ensure that their
communications are appropriately recorded and are not conducted outside
of official channels in order to avoid market oversight,” said SEC Chair
Gary Gensler. “Unfortunately, in the past we’ve seen violations in the
financial markets that were committed using unofficial communications
channels, such as the foreign exchange scandal of 2013.
Books-and-records obligations help the SEC conduct its important
examinations and enforcement work. They build trust in our system.
Ultimately, everybody should play by the same rules, and today’s charges
signal that we will continue to hold market participants accountable for
violating our time-tested recordkeeping requirements.”
As described in the SEC’s order, JPMS admitted that from at least
January 2018 through November 2020, its employees often communicated
about securities business matters on their personal devices, using text
messages, WhatsApp, and personal email accounts. None of these records
were preserved by the firm as required by the federal securities laws.
JPMS further admitted that these failures were firm-wide and that
practices were not hidden within the firm. Indeed, supervisors,
including managing directors and other senior supervisors – the very
people responsible for implementing and ensuring compliance with JPMS’s
policies and procedures – used their personal devices to communicate
about the firm’s securities business.
JPMS received both subpoenas for documents and voluntary requests from
SEC staff in numerous investigations during the time period that the
firm failed to maintain required records. In responding to these
subpoenas and requests, JPMS frequently did not search for relevant
records contained on the personal devices of its employees. JPMS
acknowledged that its recordkeeping failures deprived the SEC staff of
timely access to evidence and potential sources of information for
extended periods of time and in some instances permanently. As such, the
firm’s actions meaningfully impacted the SEC’s ability to investigate
potential violations of the federal securities laws.
“Recordkeeping requirements are core to the Commission’s enforcement and
examination programs and when firms fail to comply with them, as
JPMorgan did, they directly undermine our ability to protect investors
and preserve market integrity,” said Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the
SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “We encourage registrants to not only
scrutinize their document preservation processes and self-report
failures such as those outlined in today’s action before we identify
them, but to also consider the types of policies and procedures JPMorgan
implemented to redress its failures in this case.”
“As today’s order reflects, JPMorgan’s failures hindered several
Commission investigations and required the staff to take additional
steps that should not have been necessary,” said Sanjay Wadhwa, Deputy
Director of Enforcement. “This settlement reflects the seriousness of
these violations. Firms must share the mission of investor protection
rather than inhibit it with incomplete recordkeeping.”
JPMS agreed to the entry of an order in which it admitted to the SEC’s
factual findings and its conclusion that JPMS’s conduct violated Section
17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 17a-4(b)(4) and
17a-4(j) thereunder, and that the firm failed reasonably to supervise
its employees with a view to preventing or detecting certain of its
employees’ aiding and abetting violations. JPMS was ordered to cease and
desist from future violations of those provisions, was censured, and was
ordered to pay the $125 million penalty. JPMS also agreed to retain a
compliance consultant to, among other things, conduct a comprehensive
review of its policies and procedures relating to the retention of
electronic communications found on personal devices and JPMS’s framework
for addressing non-compliance by its employees with those policies and
procedures.
As a result of the findings in this investigation, the SEC has commenced
additional investigations of record preservation practices at financial
firms. Firms that believe that their record preservation practices do
not comply with the securities laws are encouraged to contact the SEC
at BDRecordsPreservation@sec.gov.
Separately, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced a
settlement with JPMS and affiliated entities for related conduct.
The SEC’s investigation, which is continuing, has been conducted by
Joshua Brodsky, Zachary Sturges, Theresa Gue, Andrew Dean, Osman Nawaz,
Adam Grace, John Enright, and Thomas P. Smith, Jr. of the New York
Regional Office, and Laura K. Bennett, Christopher G. Margand, Margaret
Y. Rubin, Sonia G. Torrico, and David A. Becker of the Home Office. The
case is being supervised by Mr. Wadhwa, Richard R. Best, and Carolyn
Welshhans.