The Witness Murder in the matter Bennett vs. Southern Pacific heard by Judge Peter Spinetta
Bennett lost millions when represented by Bennett and Johnson folded his case after years of litigation, Bennett enduring revenue reasonable losses upwards of 300 Million with the loss of Mainframe Designs Cabinets and Fixtures. Founded in 1980 in a small 1000 sf shop grew to 10,000 sf, with monthly revenues approaching $100,000.
One day Bennett learned one of key witnesses was murdered sometime between 1989 and 1990 at the tail end of the litigation. At the time Southern Pacific was floating a six to seven figure settlement. Bennett met the track investigator who said they were ready with a $750,000 investment.
Bennett married in 1996, learned of the witness murder in 2000 or later, his truck exploded when his life insurance, assets and inheritance were easily over 1.2 Million at death. What Bennett didn't was his Mormon wife was raised by the defense attorney connected to the witness murder. Visit Disbarred Attorneys to learn more about how the Nate Greenan, son of Attorney James Greenan former President of Contra Costa Bar Association lost his life on WB Highway 24 in Orinda. Nate played at VinniesBar.com with Bennett during March 2012,
Bennett was arrested that same week where he Contra Costa Sheriff Deputy Carlos Francies who realized Bennett cellmate was a dangerous felon. That inmate was placed in Bennett's cell by Deputy Vince Jimenez formerly a deputy in Danville with Deputy Tanabe later arrested in the case locally known as CNET Scandal
Nate was driving on hwy 24 where suddenly switched lanes, went over the rail at Camino Pablo subsequently was killed. Bennett was driven to court by his former Counsel Dax Craven who never shared he was the son-in-law of James Greenan then President of the Bar controlling attorney referrals.
A 30 year set of lies
The big Kahuna uncovered years later between Greenan, the Southern Pacific Attorney Rick Kopf, Safeway CEO Steve Burd, District Mark Peterson and his brother Michael Peterson ties back to the Alamo 1st Ward located on Stone Valley Road.
There is another divorcee who suddenly started attending Alamo 1st in 2004 with her near identical family law battle to get her son back from Idaho. She vanished but when asking members that new there was a sense of stonewalling.
When my realtor friend Brian Schwalen died just hours after services was the last time I attended Alamo 1st Ward.
October 24, 2007
COURT SAYS LAWYER HARASSED JUDGE FOR YEARS
Comments
I don't want to be off topic, but I noticed this blog on the Recorder web page right underneath a story about me. I have not read the story about me yet, but if anyone is interested in it, please email me at boatbrain @ aol.com aith any questions.
my comments are located at www.myspace.com/calbarblog. read on stay straight and GOP
I wrote a letter to the editor of the Recorder to tell them I was kind of disappointed that they did not give any of the reasons for my complaints against Orloff in the article.
Very briefly, I was a whistleblower when Orloff and Judge Barbara Miller tried to cover up the crimes of Martin Nakahara, who is the older brother of Judge Vernon Nakahara.
Martin Nakahara was a prominent East Bay lawyer who embezzled from an estate. I will not give all the details here, but the point is, I discovered the crimes, reported them to both Judge Miller, and the DA's office, and found out they were not going to take any action, so I put out some leaflets near the courthouse to tell the public, and got attacked for that.
Sorry if this was off topic but the article about me was right over top of the link to this one and there seems to be a mutual theme of people with gripes.
FYI also - Judge Miller was my divorce judge, but unlike the attorney in this article she did nothing I had any gripe with in the divorce, until helping to cover up for her fellow judge's brother.
One more comment about my own case.
The charge against me was dismissed after I made a motion for disqualfication of the DA's office, and then subpoenaed Tom Orloff and Nancy O'Malley, numbers 1 and 2 in that office, to the hearing.
Bottom line, they preferred to let the case go rather than testify, which I think says a lot.
I don't want to be off topic, but I noticed this blog on the Recorder web page right underneath a story about me. I have not read the story about me yet, but if anyone is interested in it, please email me at boatbrain @ aol.com aith any questions.
my comments are located at www.myspace.com/calbarblog. read on stay straight and GOP
I wrote a letter to the editor of the Recorder to tell them I was kind of disappointed that they did not give any of the reasons for my complaints against Orloff in the article.
Very briefly, I was a whistleblower when Orloff and Judge Barbara Miller tried to cover up the crimes of Martin Nakahara, who is the older brother of Judge Vernon Nakahara.
Martin Nakahara was a prominent East Bay lawyer who embezzled from an estate. I will not give all the details here, but the point is, I discovered the crimes, reported them to both Judge Miller, and the DA's office, and found out they were not going to take any action, so I put out some leaflets near the courthouse to tell the public, and got attacked for that.
Sorry if this was off topic but the article about me was right over top of the link to this one and there seems to be a mutual theme of people with gripes.
FYI also - Judge Miller was my divorce judge, but unlike the attorney in this article she did nothing I had any gripe with in the divorce, until helping to cover up for her fellow judge's brother.
One more comment about my own case.
The charge against me was dismissed after I made a motion for disqualfication of the DA's office, and then subpoenaed Tom Orloff and Nancy O'Malley, numbers 1 and 2 in that office, to the hearing.
Bottom line, they preferred to let the case go rather than testify, which I think says a lot.
Update: Code Enforcement Services during the Shelter In Place Order
The Code Enforcer
One of my intersections with the code enforcement was right here in the
Memorial Park where it was clear somebody was retaliating against me happy
electricians from the city came in and disconnected my plug then via a long
list of accusational text messages accuses me of stealing power from the city
of Walnut Creek.
One of the troubling parts of my story is the number of police calls directed
at me over and over and over for over 10 years, he's trespassing, he's a
vagrant, he is illegally camping and his car is parked let's give him $4,000
in tickets and then take his truck then deny claims in 2014 they did that by
September relatives to his family was in Utah was killed.
Only five dead three under the age of 14 who's counting.
Someone is counting and has many on the radar.
Case FLMSD93-04002 - JACQUELYN R DOZIER VS KAPTEYN A DOZIER
Case FLMSD93-04002 - JACQUELYN R DOZIER VS KAPTEYN A DOZIER
Case FLMSD93-04002 - Complaints/Parties
Complaint Number: 1
Complaint Type: Pre-JBSIS Complaint/Petition
Filing Date: 08/13/1993
Complaint Status: ACTIVE
Party Number Party Type Party Name Attorney Party Status
1 PLAINTIFF JACQUELYN RUTH DOZIER PRO PER
2 DEFENDANT KAPTEYN A. DOZIER PRO PER Serve Required (WaitS)
Case FLMSD93-04002 - Actions/Minutes
Viewed
Date
Action Text
Disposition
Image
04/27/1995 NTC OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WITH CERT OF MAILING
04/11/1995 JUDGMENT - MARITAL STATUS ENDS ON "DATE OF FILIN G" MICROFILMED: 4-11-95
03/15/1995 ** 2336 PKG TO LEGAL TECH
03/14/1995 RESPTS INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION
03/14/1995 PETNRS INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION
03/14/1995 RESPTS DECL REGARDING SERV OF FINAL DECL OF DIS CLOSURE AND INC & EXPENSE DECLARATION
03/14/1995 PETNRS DECL REGARDING SERV OF FINAL DECL OF DIS CLOSURE AND INC & EXPENSE DECLARATION
03/14/1995 APPEARANCE, STIP. & WAIVERS
03/14/1995 DECL FOR DEFAULT OR UNCONTESTED DISSOLUTION FC 2 336
02/24/1995 SUBST OF ATTY FOR (P) (NEW: PRO PER) (OLD: GEORG E W. PFEIFFER)
10/18/1993 > RESPONSE FILED
10/18/1993 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL RE RESPONSE
09/24/1993 SUMMONS W/PRF OF PERS SVC OF SUMM/PTN RE KAP TEY N A DOZIER ON 9-17-93
08/13/1993 PETN FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE - SUMMONS ISSUE D
Case FLMSD93-04002 - Pending Hearings
Date
Action Text
Disposition
Image
This Case Does Not Have Any Pending Hearings
Forensic Medical Group - Scott Peterson was Perfectly Framed
Scott Peterson is Innocent
Scott Peterson is Innocent
Forensic Medical Group
1261 Travis Blvd # 120,
Fairfield CA 94533
(707) 426-4883
I knew this man, performed on stage with him in 2012, I know his father
through Alamo First Ward in Danville former head of the head of the Contra
Costa Bar Association and realized I had more than one intersection with him
over as much as 20 years.
He looks like he's carrying the sword in the discussions with the murders of
Ernie Scherer Jr and his wife which put in Ernie Scherer the third in prison
for life but they all played poker in the world poker tour with the Russians
that were arrested in Trump Tower.
He is not the only local musician killed.
The Bar Association please heavily into my economic losses where my attorney
from San Francisco Trial Lawyers Association was beaten my other attorney that
came from prepaid legal his office is burned down the brother-in-law of Mike
disbarred attorney is Nate.
BlackRock CEO Tells Companies To Contribute To Society. Here's Where To Start
BlackRock CEO Tells Companies To Contribute To Society. Here's Where To Start
TWEET THIS
Some events stand out as watershed moments that re-define the
environment and re-direct the course of events. Bill Gates writing his
“Tidalwave of the Internet” memo in 1995. Steve Jobs holding up the
iPhone in 2007. I believe we’re seeing another such moment: on January
12, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink sent a letter to CEOs of public
companies telling them that they’re responsibility not only to deliver
profits, but also to make “a positive contribution to society.”
In his letter, which I received from BlackRock today, Fink lays out a number of
requests which one might find surprising from a $6 trillion asset
manager. He cites the pre-occupation with short-term, reactive
measures to drive quarterly profits and asks CEOs to focus
on “investments in employee development, innovation and capital
expenditures that are necessary for longer-term growth.”
Even more electrifying, however, was Fink’s clarion call for CEOs to
seize the mantle of leadership in making the world a better place,
beyond simply delivering profits. He sees governments as failing in
their duty to address the major challenges that loom in the future: “As
a result, society is increasingly turning to the private sector and
asking that companies respond to broader societal challenges.”
To make this case, Fink explicitly raises the issue of purpose as the
critical North Star to guide corporate decisions: “ Without a sense of purpose, no company, either public or private,
can achieve its full potential. It will ultimately lose the license
to operate from key stakeholders. ” He cites environmental impact, workforce
diversity, community engagement and employee re-training as among the
larger issues companies must grapple with.
MORE FROM FORBES
The reason Fink’s letter is so striking is that it goes straight to the
heart of a raging debate about the role of social purpose in a brand’s
agenda. One camp, call it Team Jim Stengel, argues that embracing purpose is not only essential to developing
resonant customer relationships, but it also drives better corporate
performance. The opposing camp, call it Team Mark Ritson, believes that social causes are for one’s private life and
that the purpose of business is to drive profits.
Fink’s letter says they’re both right. Make no mistake, the outcome Fink
seeks is a healthy long-term return for the millions of individuals
whose investments he stewards—he offers no easy outs for disappointing
performance. The challenge he lays out is to simultaneously walk and
chew gum, to find that magic resolution of the seemingly competing
mandates: deliver financial returns and make the world better at the same time.
In his letter, Fink pulls the rug out from under that most common
and potent objection to embracing a broader purpose beyond selling
product: that shareholders don’t value your lofty ideals, they only
want profits. Executives can no longer point to Wall Street as a reason
for staying safely on the sidelines of the uncomfortable challenges and
debates around social, environmental and political issues.
Many companies are already well down this path, with a range of results
from laudable to cringeworthy. The Dove brand has won many kudos for
its stirring campaigns focused on the notion of real beauty; Pepsi, on the
other hand, earned widespread condemnation for its ad that featured Kendall Jenner defusing a social protest with a can of soda. Even
leaving aside the question of how purpose relates to profits, embarking
on a brand agenda for social good is no simple matter.
Here is a set of key steps to follow, for companies that are either
contemplating their first step into the social sphere, or that are
already down that path but unsure of their progress:
Start with core values and beliefs. Any effort to weigh into the bigger social issues must be grounded in
a set of deeply held values and beliefs. The worst thing a brand can do
is to jump on the bandwagon of an issue that is hot but not
sincerely meaningful to the company or its leadership. Savvy consumers
will quickly sniff out a phony purpose and the brand will suffer. What
issues genuinely motivate the company’s leaders? Its employees? What was
the gleam in the eye of the founder? Where does the business model
intersect with social concerns, such as sustainable supply chain,
diversity, health care, or others? For this work, it’s always worth
re-watching Simon Sinek’s inspiring Ted Talk, “Start with Why”.
Assess your risk profile. When wading into the arena of social purpose, there is a spectrum of
choices: from a generally uncontroversial purpose (e.g. real
beauty) to a sharper, more current issue (e.g. voter registration) to a
polar position on a hot topic (e.g. opposing Trump’s immigration
policy). As you move along the spectrum, you increase both the
likelihood of resonating powerfully with people who agree, along with
the risk of alienating those who don’t. Be sure to align with
leadership, board and other stakeholders as to where you’re ready to
land, as you don’t want second-guessing and finger-pointing in the event
of any backlash.
Pick a focused, credible issue. Resist the temptation to take on overly broad, ill-defined problems.
Instead set your sights on a concern that is clear and defined. A fuzzy
mash-up of social strife set Pepsi up for failure, whereas Frito-Lay
more successfully zeroed in on voter registration among young people. Make sure there is an
appropriate and credible role for your brand in your chosen issue. To
the point of walking and chewing gum, the challenge is to find that
golden intersection of issues that are meaningful to society and
relevant to your brand. Heineken took on the lack of civil
dialogue amidst conflict and credibly showed people discussing
their differences over a beer.
Get the right guidance. The meaningful issues that make up brand purpose are fraught with
nuances and pitfalls that can trip up well-meaning brands and unleash
indignation. Shades of word choice and imagery can trigger powerful
unintended reactions. Even the much-lauded Dove experienced this
backlash from an online ad that showed an African-American woman pulling off a
brown t-shirt to reveal a white woman in a white shirt underneath. Bring
in voices that can represent those most affected by the concerns you’re
addressing.
For a private sector company to take on the challenge of making society
better, a good dose of courage and intestinal fortitude are required.
By issuing both permission and a mandate to play a broader
societal role, Larry Fink has hopefully provided CEOs with that last
push needed to step up to the challenge.
Peter Horst is a Fortune 500 CMO and Founder of CMO Inc., a marketing consultancy. He is also the author of the bestseller, "Marketing in the #FakeNews Era." Join the conversation @PeterHorst.
Rebecca Beth Bauer-Kahan #233007
Ms. Bauer-Kahan represents constituents in the 16th District
Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan Representing the 16th California Assembly ... their plan to expand abortion care and access in the Golden State.
Attorney Licensee Profile
Rebecca Beth Bauer-Kahan #233007
License Status: Active
Address: PO Box 335, Orinda, CA 94563-0335
County: Contra Costa County
Phone Number: Not Available
Fax Number: Not Available
Email: rbauer2@hotmail.com
Law School: Georgetown Univ Law Ctr; Washington DC
License Status: Active
Address: PO Box 335, Orinda, CA 94563-0335
County: Contra Costa County
Phone Number: Not Available
Fax Number: Not Available
Email: rbauer2@hotmail.com
Law School: Georgetown Univ Law Ctr; Washington DC
License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History
Below you will find all changes of license status due to both non-disciplinary administrative matters and disciplinary actions.
Date License Status Discipline Administrative Action Present Active 1/1/2018 Active 9/13/2012 Inactive 7/1/2005 Active 1/1/2005 Inactive 12/1/2004 Admitted to The State Bar of California
| Date | License Status | Discipline | Administrative Action |
| Present | Active | ||
| 1/1/2018 | Active | ||
| 9/13/2012 | Inactive | ||
| 7/1/2005 | Active | ||
| 1/1/2005 | Inactive | ||
| 12/1/2004 | Admitted to The State Bar of California | ||
