Bennett Connections
CEO of Accenture
The former CEO of Accenture showed up on my LinkedIn profile back in 2013
right around that time Target was breached costing them 500 million dollars
yes these companies are connected.
I don't have the rest in peace version at the moment but it's him.
I have better than 30 years involved in software development, services and networks I know the rise and fall of these companies the Acquisitions the mergers and the failures.
When a series of CEOs connected to applications and clients you've known for years you got a Wonder especially when even though I'm a CEO of my small company that's folded I nearly died in 2005 and on a smaller level I've seen this happen locally in the East Bay
I have better than 30 years involved in software development, services and networks I know the rise and fall of these companies the Acquisitions the mergers and the failures.
When a series of CEOs connected to applications and clients you've known for years you got a Wonder especially when even though I'm a CEO of my small company that's folded I nearly died in 2005 and on a smaller level I've seen this happen locally in the East Bay
More Dead CEOs
Pete BennettMarch 18, 2020#deadwitness, Dead Witness, H-1b, Hostile Takeovers, Human Capital Management, OBIT, Oracle Corporation, Outsourcing, Outsourcing Jobs, PeopleSoft, Technology, WTC
No comments
On their own not much really to worry about together in a straight line think
again
Former CEO of HP and Oracle somebody that's a name that in the Tech Industries
well-known and his peer is the next posting
Oct 18, 2019 - Hurd's time at Oracle came to a halt in September when he announced he
was taking a leave of absence to recover from an ongoing illness.
At ...
Without knowing the cause of death, I think it's premature to say that he worked himself to death. It was probably some kind of cancer that probably would
have ...
Oct 18, 2019 - Oracle CEO Mark Hurd, 62, has died, according to the company, just a little more than a month after
taking a leave of absence for health-related reasons, Hurd had a distinguished career in the technology industry where he
began his career more than 30 years ago.
dead ceos
I follow unusual statistics right now I'm stuck in a cell phone my post will be changing to just a little bit of this and that. The CEO of Kaiser, Accenture, Tinker Ventures, and Oracle all have died plus a few others in the last 12 months
Alliant Feel Good Code of Ethics and Compliance Statement
Pete BennettMarch 13, 2020City of Walnut Creek, Compliance, Ethics, Insurance, Municipal Pooling Authority
No comments
Code of Ethics and Compliance Statement
Alliant is committed to conducting its business in adherence to all
legal requirements established by the states and territories in which it
provides services and products. Alliant takes pride in maintaining the highest
ethical standards and industry best practices. To this end, Alliant places the
best interests of its clients as paramount to any other concerns involved in
the placement of insurance services and products. Specifically, Alliant:
- Abides by its ethical obligations to deliver honest, competitive, and meaningful service and advice on the placement of any insurance products, services, or coverages, and strives to provide access to an open, fair, and competitive insurance market place;
- Exercises due diligence in making full and complete disclosures of all quotes and declinations from all markets contacted for each specific line of coverage, including the date and time of contact, the name, address, phone number, and to the extent available, email address of the individual contact for each market;
- Makes every good faith effort to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest between Alliant, its clients, and/or any provider of any insurance products or services, and promptly notifies clients of any real or potential conflict; and
- Takes reasonable steps to ensure that any available commission rates are provided to its clients upon request, including the identification of the appropriate contact sources from which to obtain commission rate information on the insurance policies issued.
About Alliant Products and source of Investment Fund
Case CIVMS288292 - EAST BAY REGIONAL VS TOSCO CORP ET AL
Case CIVMS288292 - EAST BAY REGIONAL VS TOSCO CORP ET AL
Case CIVMS288292 - Complaints/Parties
Case CIVMS288292 - Actions/Minutes
Case CIVMS288292 - Pending Hearings
Case CIVMS288292 - Complaints/Parties
| ||||||||||||||
Party Number | Party Type | Party Name | Attorney | Party Status | ||||||||||
1 | PLAINTIFF | EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT | LARSON, JACOBSMEYER, & VANDERSLOOT | |||||||||||
2 | DEFENDANT | TOSCO CORPORATION | WILSON, MORTON,& ADAMS | Serve Required (WaitS) | ||||||||||
3 | DEFENDANT | SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY | Unrepresented | Serve Required (WaitS) |
Case CIVMS288292 - Actions/Minutes
Viewed
|
Date
|
Action Text
|
Disposition
|
Image
| |||||
02/16/1988 8:00 AM DEPT. 05 | MAN.SETTLE.CONF.(ALDERSON TO NOTICE) | COMPLETED | |||||||
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 | |||||||||
11/06/1987 8:00 AM DEPT. 05 | MAN.SETTLE.CONF.(ALDERSON TO NOTICE) |
Case CIVMS288292 - Pending Hearings
Date
|
Action Text
|
Disposition
|
Image
|
This Case Does Not Have Any Pending Hearings |
Case CIVMSC02-02815 - CCC VS. ROSE WINTER
Pete BennettMarch 06, 2020County Counsel, Court Cases, Eminent Domain Complaint, KEVIN D. LALLY, Pittsburg, Southern Pacific, SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY
No comments
Case CIVMSC02-02815 - CCC VS. ROSE WINTER
Case CIVMSC02-02815 - Complaints/Parties
Case CIVMSC02-02815 - Actions/Minutes
Case CIVMSC02-02815 - Complaints/Parties
| ||||||||||||||
Party Number | Party Type | Party Name | Attorney | Party Status | ||||||||||
1 | PLAINTIFF | CONTRA COSTA COUNTY | COUNTY COUNSEL | DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 10/28/2003 | ||||||||||
LALLY, KEVIN D. | ||||||||||||||
2 | DEFENDANT | ROSE CLARKE WINTER | CONNOR, F. GALE | DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 10/28/2003 | ||||||||||
3 | DEFENDANT | ROSE CLARKE WINTER | CONNOR, F. GALE | DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 10/28/2003 | ||||||||||
4 | DEFENDANT | ANTHONY RUGGIERO | Unrepresented | PARTY DISMISSED 03/20/2003 | ||||||||||
5 | DEFENDANT | SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY | WHITCOMB, MICHAEL L | PARTY DISMISSED 03/20/2003 | ||||||||||
6 | DEFENDANT | ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN CLAI MING AN INTEREST | Unrepresented | DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 10/28/2003 | ||||||||||
7 | DEFENDANT | WINTER CHEVROLET COMPANY INC | CONNOR, F. GALE | DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 10/28/2003 |
Case CIVMSC02-02815 - Actions/Minutes
Viewed
|
Date
|
Action Text
|
Disposition
|
Image
| |||||
10/29/2003 9:00 AM DEPT. 33 | HEARING ON OSC RE: FAILURE TO FILE DISMISSAL | VACATED | |||||||
10/28/2003 | REQUEST FILED AND DISMISSAL ENTERED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO ENTIRE ACTION | Not Applicable | |||||||
10/28/2003 | ENTIRE ACTION DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE | Not Applicable | |||||||
08/26/2003 9:00 AM DEPT. 33 | HEARING ON OSC RE: FAILURE TO FILE DISMISSAL | CONTINUED | |||||||
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 | |||||||||
08/14/2003 | STAGE AT DISPOSITION- CASE SETTLED BEFORE TRIAL | Not Applicable | |||||||
08/14/2003 | CASE DISPOSITIONED - SETTLED AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE | Not Applicable | |||||||
08/11/2003 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FILED BY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY | Not Applicable | |||||||
08/04/2003 | OSC HEARING RE: FAILURE TO FILE DISMISSAL WAS SET FOR 8/26/03 AT 9:00 IN DEPT. 33 | ||||||||
08/04/2003 7:00 AM DEPT. 33 | CHECK FOR DISMISSAL DUE | VACATED | |||||||
04/28/2003 9:00 AM DEPT. 33 | SPECIAL SET HEARING ON: FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET BY THE COURT | DROPPED BY COURT | |||||||
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 | |||||||||
04/28/2003 | PLACED ON CLERK`S CALENDAR FOR 8/04/03 AT 7:00 IN DEPT. 33 | ||||||||
04/25/2003 | ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL OF DEPOSIT FROM STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR $1,742,000.00 PAYABLE TO PLACER TITLE IN TRUS | Not Applicable | |||||||
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 | |||||||||
04/25/2003 | STIPULATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF DEPOSIT FROM STATE OF CALIFORNIA FILED | Not Applicable | |||||||
03/20/2003 | REQUEST FILED & DISMISSAL ENTERED EMINENT DOMAIN COMPLAINT FILED 10/08/2002 OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AS TO DEFENDANT ANTHONY RUGGIERO, SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY WITHOUT PREJUDICE | Not Applicable | |||||||
03/13/2003 | ASSOCIATION OF ATTORNEYS FILED ON THE EMINENT DOMAIN COMPLAINT FILED 10/08/2002 OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ON BEHALF OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY NAMING KEVIN D. LALLY AS CO-COUNSEL | Not Applicable | |||||||
03/11/2003 | NOTICE OF/TO RIGHT TO APPEAR & OBJECT TO WITHDRAWAL OF DEPOSIT FILED ON BEHALF OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY | Not Applicable | |||||||
03/11/2003 | OBJECTION TO WITHDRAWAL OF DEPOSIT FILED BY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY | Not Applicable | |||||||
03/05/2003 8:30 AM DEPT. 33 | CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE | COMPLETED | |||||||
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 | |||||||||
02/25/2003 8:30 AM DEPT. 33 | CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE | CONTINUE | |||||||
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 | |||||||||
02/13/2003 | CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT FILED BY SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY | Not Applicable | |||||||
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 | |||||||||
02/10/2003 | CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT FILED BY ROSE CLARKE WINTER | Not Applicable | |||||||
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 | |||||||||
02/10/2003 | CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT FILED BY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY | Not Applicable | |||||||
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 | |||||||||
01/24/2003 7:00 AM DEPT. 33 | CHECK FOR REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT | VACATED | |||||||
01/17/2003 | (U.J.) ANSWER TO EMINENT DOMAIN COMPLAINT FILED 10/08/2002 OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FILED BY SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY | Not Applicable | |||||||
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 | |||||||||
01/07/2003 | 5CMC1 CALENDARED ON 02/25/03 IN DEPT. 165. HAS BEEN UPDATED TO 02/25/03 IN DEPT. 33. | Not Applicable | |||||||
01/07/2003 | PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE FILED ON EMINENT DOMAIN COMPLAINT FILED 10/08/2002 OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AS TO SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY WITH SERVICE DATE OF 12/20/02 | Not Applicable | |||||||
01/06/2003 | (U.J.) ANSWER TO EMINENT DOMAIN COMPLAINT FILED 10/08/2002 OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FILED BY ROSE CLARKE WINTER, ROSE CLARKE WINTER, WINTER CHEVROLET COMPANY INC | Not Applicable | |||||||
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 | |||||||||
01/06/2003 | WINTER CHEVROLET COMPANY INC ADDED AS A DEFENDANT/CROSS-DEFT | Not Applicable | |||||||
12/17/2002 | 5ORDC1 CALENDARED ON 01/24/03 IN DEPT. 165. HAS BEEN UPDATED TO 01/24/03 IN DEPT. 33. | Not Applicable | |||||||
12/12/2002 7:00 AM DEPT. 165 | CHECK FOR PROOF OF SERVICE | VACATED | |||||||
12/10/2002 | CLERK`S TICKLER TO CHECK FOR REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT WAS SET FOR 1/24/03 AT 7:00 IN DEPT. 165 | ||||||||
12/10/2002 | PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE FILED ON EMINENT DOMAIN COMPLAINT FILED 10/08/2002 OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AS TO ROSE CLARKE WINTER, ROSE CLARKE WINTER WITH SERVICE DATE OF 12/09/02 | Not Applicable | |||||||
12/10/2002 | ORIGINAL SUMMONS ON EMINENT DOMAIN COMPLAINT FILED 10/08/2002 OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FILED | Not Applicable | |||||||
10/08/2002 | CASE HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO DEPT. 165 | ||||||||
10/08/2002 | CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WAS SET FOR 2/25/03 AT 8:30 IN DEPT. 165 | ||||||||
10/08/2002 | CLERK`S TICKLER TO CHECK FOR PROOF OF SERVICE WAS SET FOR 12/12/02 AT 7:00 IN DEPT. 165 | ||||||||
10/08/2002 | COMPLAINT FILED RE EMINENT DOMAIN. SUMMONS IS ISSUED. | Not Applicable | |||||||
10/08/2002 | NOTICE OF PROBABLE COMPENSATION FILED. | Not Applicable | |||||||
10/08/2002 | ORDER FOR IMMEDIATE POSSESSION FILED. | Not Applicable | |||||||
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 | |||||||||
10/08/2002 | NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS FILED | Not Applicable | |||||||
10/08/2002 | DECLARATION OF KAREN A. LAWS FILED RE: IN SUPPORT OF ORDER FOR IMMEDIATE POSSESSION | Not Applicable | |||||||
10/08/2002 | SUMMARY OF BASIS FOR APPRAISAL FILED. | Not Applicable | |||||||
10/08/2002 | CASE ENTRY COMPLETE | Not Applicable | |||||||
10/08/2002 | COLOR OF FILE IS YELLOW | Not Applicable |
Engineering Intern
Engineering Intern
Salary
$25.00 - $30.00 Hourly
Location
Walnut Creek, CA
Job Type
Internship
Department
Public Works
Job Number
20-16H
Division
Engineering
Closing
3/13/2020 5:00 PM Pacific
- Position Description
- OPEN UNTIL FILLED- THIS POSITION MAY CLOSE AT ANY TIME!Are you interested in working in the field of civil engineering? Do you want to make a difference in your community while gaining experience working in local government? The City of Walnut Creek is seeking a collaborative, team oriented Engineering Intern to assist the Engineering Division of the City's Public Works Department with a variety of projects and tasks.
This is a specialized classification for college students or recent graduates planning to enter the public sector. The nature of work is varied and includes assisting with civil engineering work under direct supervision in the design, construction, inspection, and coordination of a variety of public works projects. The majority of the Engineering Intern's work will be completed in an office environment, with occasional construction/site visits. - Representative Duties
- The candidate may work in several fields of engineering and perform the following duties:
- Assists staff with complex engineering problems.
- Assists in the preparation of plans and specifications for City projects, such as construction of streets, storm drains, and other public works projects.
- Assists with engineering work related to subdivisions, development, site improvement construction, land division, transportation, traffic engineering, and preparation of other plans and applications as well as other related work.
- Qualifications Guidelines
- This internship is only open to recent accredited college or university graduates or students currently enrolled in undergraduate or graduate studies with major coursework in Civil Engineering, Construction Management, Transportation/Traffic Engineering, Environmental Engineering, or a related field.
One year of classes and/or work experience in civil engineering or public works experience is desired.
The ideal candidate is:- Collaborative, flexible, and team oriented
- Interested in learning materials, methods, and techniques in the design and construction of civil engineering projects
- Seeks to understand applicable laws, regulations, ordinances, and engineering standards pertaining to the design and construction of public works projects
- Resourceful and a problem solver
- Can effectively utilize computer applications, including familiarity with AutoCAD Civil 3D
- Familiar with Microsoft Office Suite, including Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook
- Enthusiastic about learning new technology and programs
- Positive and able to maintain effective working relationships with our team, co-workers, and the public
Possession of or ability to obtain, prior to employment, a Class C California Driver's License and a good driving record. - Supplemental Information
- Interested applicants must apply online at www.walnut-creek.org to be eligible for consideration. Complete and submit your online employment application and resume by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, March 13, 2020.
All applicants will be notified by email as to whether or not they are invited to participate further in the selection process.
Applicants considered for this position are subject to California Department of Justice and FBI fingerprinting.
If special accommodations are necessary at any stage of the examination process, please provide the Human Resources Department with advance notice and every attempt will be made to consider your request.
The City of Walnut Creek's interns are classified as hourly positions and incumbents are employed by a third party.
- Agency
- City of Walnut Creek
- Address
-
1666 North Main Street
Walnut Creek, California, 94596
Disability Discrimination
Disability Discrimination
Disability discrimination occurs when an employer or other entity covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended, or the Rehabilitation Act, as amended, treats a qualified individual with a disability who is an employee or applicant unfavorably because she has a disability. Learn more about the Act at ADA at 25.
Disability discrimination also occurs when a covered employer or other entity treats an applicant or employee less favorably because she has a history of a disability (such as cancer that is controlled or in remission) or because she is believed to have a physical or mental impairment that is not transitory (lasting or expected to last six months or less) and minor (even if she does not have such an impairment).
The law requires an employer to provide reasonable accommodation to an employee or job applicant with a disability, unless doing so would cause significant difficulty or expense for the employer ("undue hardship").
The law also protects people from discrimination based on their relationship with a person with a disability (even if they do not themselves have a disability). For example, it is illegal to discriminate against an employee because her husband has a disability.
Note: Federal employees and applicants are covered by the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, instead of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The protections are mostly the same.
Disability Discrimination & Work Situations
The law forbids discrimination when it comes to any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, layoff, training, fringe benefits, and any other term or condition of employment.
Disability Discrimination & Harassment
It is illegal to harass an applicant or employee because he has a disability, had a disability in the past, or is believed to have a physical or mental impairment that is not transitory (lasting or expected to last six months or less) and minor (even if he does not have such an impairment).
Harassment can include, for example, offensive remarks about a person's disability. Although the law doesn't prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that aren't very serious, harassment is illegal when it is so frequent or severe that it creates a hostile or offensive work environment or when it results in an adverse employment decision (such as the victim being fired or demoted).
The harasser can be the victim's supervisor, a supervisor in another area, a co-worker, or someone who is not an employee of the employer, such as a client or customer.
Disability Discrimination & Reasonable Accommodation
The law requires an employer to provide reasonable accommodation to an employee or job applicant with a disability, unless doing so would cause significant difficulty or expense for the employer.
A reasonable accommodation is any change in the work environment (or in the way things are usually done) to help a person with a disability apply for a job, perform the duties of a job, or enjoy the benefits and privileges of employment.
Reasonable accommodation might include, for example, making the workplace accessible for wheelchair users or providing a reader or interpreter for someone who is blind or hearing impaired.
While the federal anti-discrimination laws don't require an employer to accommodate an employee who must care for a disabled family member, the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) may require an employer to take such steps. The Department of Labor enforces the FMLA. For more information, call: 1-866-487-9243.
Disability Discrimination & Reasonable Accommodation & Undue Hardship
An employer doesn't have to provide an accommodation if doing so would cause undue hardship to the employer.
Undue hardship means that the accommodation would be too difficult or too expensive to provide, in light of the employer's size, financial resources, and the needs of the business. An employer may not refuse to provide an accommodation just because it involves some cost. An employer does not have to provide the exact accommodation the employee or job applicant wants. If more than one accommodation works, the employer may choose which one to provide.
Definition Of Disability
Not everyone with a medical condition is protected by the law. In order to be protected, a person must be qualified for the job and have a disability as defined by the law.
A person can show that he or she has a disability in one of three ways:
- A person may be disabled if he or she has a physical or mental condition that substantially limits a major life activity (such as walking, talking, seeing, hearing, or learning).
- A person may be disabled if he or she has a history of a disability (such as cancer that is in remission).
- A person may be disabled if he is believed to have a physical or mental impairment that is not transitory (lasting or expected to last six months or less) and minor (even if he does not have such an impairment).
Disability & Medical Exams During Employment Application & Interview Stage
The law places strict limits on employers when it comes to asking job applicants to answer medical questions, take a medical exam, or identify a disability.
For example, an employer may not ask a job applicant to answer medical questions or take a medical exam before extending a job offer. An employer also may not ask job applicants if they have a disability (or about the nature of an obvious disability). An employer may ask job applicants whether they can perform the job and how they would perform the job, with or without a reasonable accommodation.
Disability & Medical Exams After A Job Offer For Employment
After a job is offered to an applicant, the law allows an employer to condition the job offer on the applicant answering certain medical questions or successfully passing a medical exam, but only if all new employees in the same type of job have to answer the questions or take the exam.
Disability & Medical Exams For Persons Who Have Started Working As Employees
Once a person is hired and has started work, an employer generally can only ask medical questions or require a medical exam if the employer needs medical documentation to support an employee's request for an accommodation or if the employer believes that an employee is not able to perform a job successfully or safely because of a medical condition.
The law also requires that employers keep all medical records and information confidential and in separate medical files.
Available Resources
In addition to a variety of formal guidance documents, EEOC has developed a wide range of fact sheets, question & answer documents, and other publications to help employees and employers understand the complex issues surrounding disability discrimination.