Attorney Licensee Profile
Mary Alice Nolan #108907
This licensee is prohibited from practicing law in California by order of the California Supreme Court.
License Status: Disbarred
Address: 2924 Carter Way, Antioch, CA 94509-5317
County: Contra Costa County
Phone Number: (510) 566-5220
Fax Number: Not Available
Email: mnolan@marynolanlaw.com
Law School: Lincoln COL; CA
License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History
Below you will find all changes of license status due to both non-disciplinary administrative matters and disciplinary actions.
Date | License Status | Discipline | Administrative Action |
Present | Disbarred | ||
1/6/2017 | Disbarred | Disbarment 12-C-16497 | |
8/11/2016 | Not Eligible To Practice Law in California | Ordered inactive 12-C-16497 | |
2/20/2016 | Not Eligible To Practice Law in California | Ordered inactive 12-C-16497 | |
12/24/2013 | Not Eligible To Practice Law in California | Interim suspension after conviction 12-C-16497 | |
10/8/2013 | Not Eligible To Practice Law in California | Vol.inactive(tender of resign.w/charges) 13-Q-16567 | |
9/1/2013 | Inactive | ||
7/1/1983 | Admitted to The State Bar of California |
CLA Sections: | None |
California Lawyers Association (CLA) is an independent organization and is not part of The State Bar of California.
|
State Bar Court Cases:
Below you will find documents filed in State Bar Court cases. For additional documents, you must request them from the State Bar Court.
Discipline Summaries
Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official licensee discipline records are available upon request.
January 6, 2017
MARY ALICE NOLAN [#108907], 65, of Antioch, was disbarred Jan. 6, 2017 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court.
December 24, 2013
MARY ALICE NOLAN [#108907], 61, of Oakland was placed on interim suspension Dec. 24, 2013, following a felony conviction for tax evasion and unlawful interception of communications. She was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court.
Additional Information:
No comments:
Post a Comment