Jennifer Hudson Family Murder Trial: Guilty on All Counts
A jury has found William Balfour guilty of murdering actress Jennifer Hudson's mother, brother and 7-year-old nephew in 2008.
Balfour, 31, was accused of killing the three in a jealous rage, believing that his estranged wife, Julia Hudson, Jennifer Hudson's sister, was dating another man.
Jennifer Hudson, who sat between her fiance and Julia Hudson, silently
cried as the verdict was read. Her fiance held her hand and rubbed her
back. As Jennifer Hudson started to cry, her sister reached over and
grabbed her hand and they looked at each other for a few seconds.
Balfour appeared to sit expressionless.
After the verdict, Balfour's attorney, Cook County Public Defender Amy
Thompson, again characterized the case against Balfour as circumstantial
and maintained his innocence. She said there would be an appeal.
"We are disappointed in the verdict, but we do appreciate all of the
hard work the jury did in this case," she told reporters. "We're hoping
that the appellate court will take a look at this case with a very
critical eye."
The Hudson family left the courthouse out of the public's view without
addressing the media. Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez spoke
with Jennifer Hudson moments after the verdict and said Hudson was
"emotional, but relieved."
Later, Jennifer and Julia Hudson issued a statement of thanks to police,
prosecutors and others involved in the trial, according to The Chicago Sun-Times.
"We have felt the love and support from people all over the world and
we're very grateful," the statement said. "We want to extend a prayer
from the Hudson family to the Balfour family.
"We have all suffered terrible loss in this tragedy," the statement
added. "It is our prayer that the Lord will forgive Mr. Balfour of these
heinous acts and bring his heart into repentance someday."
The announcement that there was a verdict came shortly after the jury
told Judge Charles Burns that it was split but wrote in a note, "We are
trying." Burns ordered a resumption of deliberations in hopes of the
jury's reaching an agreement. In a second note, the jury requested
testimony about Balfour's cellphone records.
Soon afterward, after some 18 hours of deliberations over three days, the jury found Balfour guilty of all charges against him
-- three counts of first-degree murder, home invasion, residential
burglary, aggravated kidnapping and possession of a stolen vehicle.
Jurors said later that they overcame what was a 9-3 split in the jury
room favoring a guilty verdict to come to a unanimous decision.
"There were three of us who just needed to see the picture a little
clearer," said Jacinta Gholston, 35, who works for a Chicago-based
chocolate company and initially was among the dissenters. "There were
some holes or some gaps, per se, that just needed to be filled in."
Jurors said the mild disagreement was resolved by putting together a
timeline of Balfour's movements, largely from the testimony about his
cellphone records.
"He could not be in two places at one time," said Paula Halcomb, a
teacher in Chicago's southwest suburbs. "The cellphone records were key,
actually."
Despite the focus on Jennifer Hudson, jurors said the actress, her
testimony and the attention she drew to the case and courtroom did not
factor significantly into their deliberations.
"No, that didn't weigh in on our [deliberations], what Jennifer said,
because, really, she didn't say anything," juror Tracie Austin said.
"This wasn't a case about Jennifer Hudson to us," Gholston added. "This was a case about William Balfour."
"We absolutely felt some empathy for him," she added later.
Asked if the jury had any message for Jennifer Hudson, jury foreman
Robert Smith, a bus aide for the Chicago public schools, said, "To be
perfectly honest, I really don't have anything to say with her. I just
hope she can put this behind her and really get on with her life."
More Than 80 Witnesses Over Three Weeks
The trial began on April 23 in Chicago. Prosecutors called more than 80
witnesses over two weeks, and the defense rested its case after 30
minutes, calling only two witnesses to the stand. Balfour did not
testify.
Prosecutors alleged that Balfour fatally shot Hudson's mother, Darnell
Donerson, 57, in her living room, and then shot Hudson's brother Jason
Hudson, 29, as he lay in bed. He then kidnapped Hudson's nephew Julian
King, who was 7. Investigators believe the boy was shot in the head as
he lay behind the front seat of an SUV.
Prosecuting State Attorney Veryl Gambino said Balfour was in a state of
rage over Julia Hudson's dating another man, and said Balfour had issued
several threats against her and her family. Balfour allegedly was
enraged on Oct. 24, 2008, after he saw balloons another man sent to
Julia Hudson and punched them.
Julia Hudson found her mother's body in her home and initially thought
she had fallen. It wasn't until she saw blood that she realized
something worse had taken place. Julia Hudson ran screaming from the
house and called 911.
The killings happened in the family home in Chicago's tough Englewood neighborhood, where Jennifer Hudson grew up.
In Assistant State Attorney Jennifer Bagby's closing arguments, she said
that Balfour "was fueled by his obsession, his jealousy, his
determination to catch his wife, Julia Hudson, with another man. She
didn't want him around, her family didn't want him around. But in his
mind, she was his wife, and if he couldn't have her, no one could."
Bagby punctuated her narrative by frequently quoting Balfour's allegedly
repeated threat to his estranged wife: "If you leave me, I will kill
you. I will kill your family first. You will be the last to die."
While the defense argued no physical evidence linked Balfour to the
murders, prosecutors spent significant portions of their closing
arguments focusing on what they said was important physical evidence in
this case.
The evidence included cellphone records that put Balfour near the scene
at the time of murders, gun residue found on Balfour's clothing and on
the steering wheel of his car, and the key to Jason Hudson's SUV found
on Balfour when he was arrested.
Prosecutors spoke about the "overwhelming circumstantial evidence."
Balfour's attorneys say there is no evidence or DNA linking him to the murders.
Thompson said in her closing arguments that police "weren't trying to
figure this out. They had their man. They spread it across the news.
They were just trying to prove it by building a case any way they
could."
Thompson emphasized that Balfour's fingerprints were not found on the gun or the car where Julian was killed.
"The one constant in this case is that every piece of DNA evidence
absolutely excludes William Balfour," Thompson said. "The one person in
all of Chicago who didn't do it is him. That's what the evidence
showed."
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
No comments:
Post a Comment